Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences pp 1–39Cite as

Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: Approaches to Experimental Design and Reliable Parameter Determination

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

Overparametrization of models in natural sciences, including neuroscience, is a problem that is widely recognized but often not addressed in experimental studies. The systematic reduction of complex models to simpler ones for which the parameters may be reliably estimated is based on asymptotic model reduction procedures taking into account the presence of vastly different time scales in the natural phenomena being studied. The steps of the reduction process, which are reviewed here, include basic model formulation (e.g., using the law of mass action applied routinely for problems in neuroscience, biological and chemical kinetics, and other fields), model non-dimensionalization using characteristic scales (of times, species concentrations, etc.), application of an asymptotic algorithm to produce a reduced model, and analysis of the reduced model (including suggestions for experimental design and fitting the reduced model to experimental data). In addition to the review of some classical results and basic examples, we illustrate how the approach can be used in a more complex realistic case to produce several reduced kinetic models for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, a subtype of glutamate receptor expressed on neurons in the brain, with models applied to different experimental protocols. Simultaneous application of the reduced models to fitting the data obtained in a series of specially designed experiments allows for a stepwise estimation of parameters of the original conventional model which is otherwise overparameterized with respect to the existing data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Benveniste M, Clements J, Vyklicý L, Mayer ML (1990) A kinetic analysis of the modulation of N–methyl–D–aspartic acid receptors by glycine in mouse cultured hippocampal neurones. J Physiol 428:333–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements JD, Westbrook GL (1991) Activation kinetics reveal the number of glutamate and glycine binding sites on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Neuron 7(4):605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge GL, Kehl SJ, McLennan H (1983) Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral-commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 334:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzHugh R (1955) Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane. Bull Math Biophys 17(4):257–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneberger C, Papouin T, Oliet SH, Rusakov DA (2010) Long-term potentiation depends on release of D-serine from astrocytes. Nature 463(7278):232–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri V (1903) Lois générales de l’Action des diastases. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin A, Huxley A (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci GJ, Popescu GK (2018) Kinetic models for activation and modulation of NMDA receptor subtypes. Curr Opin Physiol 2:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalachev L (2006) Reduced model of neurotransmitter transport in the presence of generic receptors and transporters. J Phys Conf Ser 55:114–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupp JJ, Vissel B, Heinemann SF, Westbrook GL (1998) N–terminal domains in the NR2 subunit control desensitization of NMDA receptors. Neuron 20:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bail M, Martineau M, Sacchi S, Yatsenko N, Radzishevsky I, Conrod S, Ait Ouares K, Wolosker H, Pollegioni L, Billard JM, Mothet JP (2014) Identity of the NMDA receptor coagonist is synapse specific and developmentally regulated in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(2):204–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester RA, Jahr CE (1992) NMDA channel behavior depends on agonist affinity. J Neurosci 12(2):635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester RA, Tong G, Jahr CE (1993) Interactions between the glycine and glutamate binding sites of the NMDA receptor. J Neurosci 13(3):1088–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer ML, Vyklicky L Jr, Clements J (1989) Regulation of NMDA receptor desensitization in mouse hippocampal neurons by glycine. Nature 338(6214):425–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis L, Menten M (1913) Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Zeitsch 49:333–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Mothet JP, Le Bail M, Billard JM (2015) Time and space profiling of NMDA receptor coagonist functions. J Neurochem 135:210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray J (1993) Mathematical biology. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagumo J, Arimoto S, Yoshizawa S (1962) An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon. Proc IRE 50(10):2061–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum-Levy R, Lipinski D, Shavit S, Benveniste M (2001) Desensitization of NMDA receptor channels is modulated by glutamate agonists. Biophys J 80:2152–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll RA (2017) A brief history of long-term potentiation. Neuron 93(2):281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radzishevsky I, Sason H, Wolosker H (2013) D-serine: physiology and pathology. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 16(1):72–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusakov D, Kullmann D (1998) Geometric and viscous components of the tortuosity of the extracellular space in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(15):8975–8980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sather W, Johnson JW, Henderson G, Ascher P (1990) Glycine–insensitive desensitization of NMDA responses in cultured mouse embryonic neurons. Neuron 4:725–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savtchenko L, Rusakov D (2007) The optimal height of the synaptic cleft. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(6):1823–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segel L, Slemrod M (1989) The quasi-steady state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev 31:446–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schorge S, Elenes S, Colquhoun D (2005) Maximum likelihood fitting of single channel NMDA activity with a mechanism composed of independent dimers of subunits. J Physiol 569(Pt 2):395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiefenhofer M (1998) Quasi-steady-state approximation for chemical reaction networks. J Math Biol 36:593–609

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tikhonov A (1948) On the dependence of the solutions of differential equations on a small parameter. Mat Sb (NS) 22(64)2:193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikhonov A (1950) On systems of differential equations containing parameters. Mat Sb (NS) 27(69)1:147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong G, Jahr CE (1994) Regulation of glycine–insensitive desensitization of the NMDA receptor in outside–out patches. J Neurophysiol 72(2):754–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, Hansen KB, Yuan H, Myers SJ, Dingledine R (2010) Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev 62(3):405–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasil’eva A, Butuzov V, Kalachev L (1995) The boundary function method for singular perturbation problems. SIAM studies in applied mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voit E, Martens H, Omholt S (2015) 150 years of the mass action law. PLoS Comp Biol 11(1):e1004012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA

    Denis Shchepakin, Leonid Kalachev & Michael Kavanaugh

Authors
  1. Denis Shchepakin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonid Kalachev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Kavanaugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Shchepakin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana Dept of Mathematical Sciences, Missoula, MT, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Mathematics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

    Torsten Lindström

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Shchepakin, D., Kalachev, L., Kavanaugh, M. (2020). Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: Approaches to Experimental Design and Reliable Parameter Determination. In: Sriraman, B. (eds) Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_134-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_134-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70658-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70658-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation