Abstract
Implementing the shuffle proof of a verifiable mix-net is one of the most challenging tasks in the implementation of an electronic voting system. For non-specialists, even if they are experienced software developers, this task is nearly impossible to fulfill without spending an enormous amount of resources into studying the necessary cryptographic theory. In this paper, we present one of the existing shuffle proofs in a condensed form and explain all the necessary technical details in corresponding pseudo-code algorithms. The goal of presenting the shuffle proof in this form is to make it accessible to a broader audience and to facilitate its implementation by non-specialists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
See https://www.keylength.com for current recommendations.
- 3.
References
Digital signature standard (DSS). FIPS PUB 186–4, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2013)
Bayer, S., Groth, J.: Efficient zero-knowledge argument for correctness of a shuffle. In: Pointcheval, D., Johansson, T. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7237, pp. 263–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_17
ElGamal, T.: A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms. In: Blakley, G.R., Chaum, D. (eds.) CRYPTO 1984. LNCS, vol. 196, pp. 10–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39568-7_2
Fiat, A., Shamir, A.: How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature problems. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 186–194. Springer, Heidelberg (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47721-7_12
Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley, Boston (1997)
Locher, P., Haenni, R.: A lightweight implementation of a shuffle proof for electronic voting systems. In: Plödereder, E., Grunske, L., Schneider, E., Ull, D. (eds.) INFORMATIK 2014, 44. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik, pp. 1391–1400. No. P-232 in Lecture Notes in Informatics, Stuttgart, Germany (2014)
Maurer, U.: Unifying zero-knowledge proofs of knowledge. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) AFRICACRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5580, pp. 272–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02384-2_17
Terelius, B., Wikström, D.: Proofs of restricted shuffles. In: Bernstein, D.J., Lange, T. (eds.) AFRICACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6055, pp. 100–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12678-9_7
Wikström, D.: A commitment-consistent proof of a shuffle. In: Boyd, C., González Nieto, J. (eds.) ACISP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5594, pp. 407–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02620-1_28
Wikström, D.: User Manual for the Verificatum Mix-Net Version 1.4.0. Verificatum AB, Stockholm, Sweden (2014)
Wikström, D.: How to Implement a Stand-alone Verifier for the Verificatum Mix-Net: VMN Version 3.0.2. Verificatum AB, Stockholm, Sweden (2016)
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their thorough reviews and appreciate their comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 International Financial Cryptography Association
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haenni, R., Locher, P., Koenig, R., Dubuis, E. (2017). Pseudo-Code Algorithms for Verifiable Re-encryption Mix-Nets. In: Brenner, M., et al. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10323. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70277-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70278-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)