Skip to main content

Accounting Systems and Integration of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into Corporate Operations

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 229 Accesses

Abstract

Following the introduction of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), many companies claim to adopt them in one way or the other. Guided by the “SDG Compass” and other tools, companies are advised to go through a process of trying to understand the SDGs, defining priorities, setting goals, integrating, and reporting and communicating the results. The article points to the nature of implementing the SDGs in business, including going from macro to micro goals, managerialism, and instrumental rationality, all implicitly present in the discourse of SDGs. Such an understanding on how to implement the SDGs, however, requires a strong role of the accounting system of the firm. Based on a theoretical framework, the various roles of accounting assumed in the managerial and instrumental approach to the SDGs are discussed. These roles include the potential of the accounting system to territorialize (sustainability) issues, mediate these to other arenas or higher-order contexts, adjudicate between success and failure, and subjectivize or incentivize people within the organization. The problem of playing out these roles in relation to the SDGs is discussed, as well as the perils of doing it, including the risk of losing sight of ethical business conduct as an action-guiding principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adams CA (2017) The sustainable development goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report. ICAS/IIRC, Edinburgh/Glasgow/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams CA, Frost GR (2008) Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Account Forum 32:288–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J, Unerman J (2018) Achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals. Account Audit Account J 31(1):2–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington J, Brown J, Frame B (2007) Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecol Econ 61(2):224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F, Kanie N, Kim R (2017) Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26(1):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland RJ, Pondy LR (1983) Accounting in organizations: a union of natural and rational perspectives. Acc Organ Soc 8(2–3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie NE (2019) International business as a possible civilizing force in a cosmopolitan world. J Bus Ethics 155(4):941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti AM (2018) The social life of measures: conceptualizing measure–value environments. Theory Cult Soc 35(1):23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burritt RL, Christ KL, Rammal HG, Schaltegger S (2018) Multinational enterprise strategies for addressing sustainability: the need for consolidation. J Bus Ethics (online first)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drempetic S, Klein C, Zwergel B (2019) The influence of firm size on the ESG score: corporate sustainability ratings under review. J Bus Ethics (online first)

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund H, Frostenson M, Beime KS (2019) Performative technology intensity and teacher subjectivities. Scand J Educ Res 63(5):725–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI, UNGC, WBCSD (2015) SDG Compass. The guide for business action on the SDGs. GRI, UNGC, WBCSD. Available via www.sdgcompass.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2020

  • Hák T, Janoušková S, Moldan B (2016) Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecol Indic 60:565–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lashitew AA, Bals L, van Tulder R (2018) Inclusive business at the base of the pyramid: the role of embeddedness for enabling social innovations. J Bus Ethics (online first)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas K, Schaltegger S, Crutzen N (2016) Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. J Clean Prod 136(A):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennicken A, Miller P (2012) Accounting, territorialization and power. Foucault Stud 13:4–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW (1986) Social environments and organizational accounting. Acc Organ Soc 11(4–5):345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Power M (2013) Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory. Acad Manag Ann 7(1):557–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen J, Kreiner K (2016) Accounting, decisions and promises. Acc Organ Soc 49:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muff K, Kapalka A, Dyllick T (2018) The gap frame – translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities. Int J Manag Educ 15(2B):363–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M (2015) How accounting begins: object formation and the accretion of infrastructure. Acc Organ Soc 47:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP (2017) A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future 5(11):1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PWC (2018) From promise to reality: does business really care about the SDGs? And what needs to happen to turn words into action. PWC UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie N, Stigson B, Shrivastava P, Leach M, O’Connell D (2017) Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 12(6):911–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voegtlin C, Scherer AG (2017) Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: governing sustainable development in a globalized world. J Bus Ethics 143(2):227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosselman E (2014) The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: towards a relational ontology of management accounting. Account Bus Res 44(2):181–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Handelsbankens Forskningsstiftelser, grant number P2017-0086:1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magnus Frostenson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Frostenson, M. (2020). Accounting Systems and Integration of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into Corporate Operations. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_110-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_110-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics