Abstract
This chapter explores how contemporary Filipino teachers’ mandated and voluntary community engagements contribute to the construction of their social identity while positioning their role towards a culturally sensitive citizenship education. The chapter first interrogates the state of citizenship education in the Philippine context with particular attention to the tensions between global and national citizenship education. It then articulates how Filipino teachers’ numerous and continuous civil participation may contribute to the construction of their social identity. The discussion then focuses on how identity, particularly the manner by which this identity is constructed, influences how they deliver citizenship education both in school and in their respective communities. This analysis of teachers’ community engagements draws from data collected in my earlier study entitled “Exploring Filipino teachers’ identity and community engagements” (Redillas, Exploring Filipino teachers’ identity and community engagements. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 2017). Through cursory historical analysis of how teachers’ community engagements are implicated in a colonization agenda, this chapter establishes how engrained teachers’ community engagements are in the Philippine culture. The chapter proceeds to examine how teachers’ continuing community engagements can position them as critical agents for citizenship education in Philippine society and provide possible links between global and national citizenship education. The chapter concludes by retracing the main arguments of how Filipino teachers’ community engagements facilitate the construction of their social identity and how the experiences drawn from these civic participations contribute to organizing a culturally sensitive citizenship education.
References
Abowitz, K. K., & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary discourses of citizenship. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 653–690.
Abulon, E. L. (2014). Basic education teachers’ concept of effective teaching: Inputs to teacher education curriculum in the Philippines. In INTED2014 proceedings (pp. 850–860). Spain: IATED.
Adarlo, G. M. (2017). (Re)framing citizenship education in the Philippines: A twenty-first century imperative. The Good Society, 25(2–3), 256–288.
Adarlo, G., & Jackson, L. (2017). For whom is K-12 education: A critical look into twenty-first century educational policy and curriculum in the Philippines. In S. Choo, D. Sawch, A. Villanueva, R. Vinz (Eds.), Educating for the 21st century (pp. 207–223). Singapore: Springer.
Albia, J. (2015). Exploring global citizenship education in Philippine higher education: Implication for pedagogy, educational leadership and the building of an ASEAN community. A Master in Education paper at National Chung Cheng University.
Alcantara, P. (2013). A post-Yolanda citizenship education ‘Citizenship education across the life span is conceptualized beyond political literacy, but also for disaster adaptation’. https://www.rappler.com/move-ph/ispeak/45961-yolanda-citizenship-education. Accessed 20 July 2018.
Aldana, B. V. (1949). The educational system of the Philippines. Manila: Philippines University Publishing.
Atkinson, F. W. (1905). The Philippine islands. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. Digitized 23 Nov 2005.
Banks, J. A. (2017). Citizenship education and global migration: Implications for theory, research, and teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J Richardson (ed), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Greenwood Press, New York, pp. 280–291.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and structure of the religious field. Comparative Social Research, 13(1), 1–44.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature (ed: Johnson, R.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. In Szeman, I. and Kaposy, T. (eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology (Vol. 1, pp. 81–93). Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell. (Originally published in 1986).
Cogan, J., & Derricott, R. (2014). Citizenship for the 21st century: An international perspective on education. New York: Routledge.
Constantino, R. (1970). The mis-education of the Filipino. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1(1), 20–36.
Cornelio, J. S., & de Castro, D. F. T. (2016). The state of indigenous education in the Philippines today. In J. Xing & P. Ng (Eds.), Indigenous culture, education and globalization (pp. 159–179). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
David, R. S. (2004). Nation, self and citizenship: An invitation to Philippine sociology. Mandaluyong: Anvil Publishing, Incorporated via PublishDrive.
Davies, I. (2017). Education for a better world: The struggle for social justice in the twenty-first century. In S. Choo, D. Sawch, A. Villanueva, R. Vinz (Eds.), Educating for the 21st century (pp. 131–145). Singapore: Springer.
Davies, I., Evans, M., & Reid, A. (2005). Globalising citizenship education? A critique of ‘global education’ and ‘citizenship education’. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 66–89.
De Leon-Carillo, C. (2007). Filipino pre-service education students’ preconceptions of teacher roles viewed through a metaphorical lens. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 197–217.
De Los Reyes, E. J. (2013). (Re)defining the Filipino: Notions of citizenship in the new K+ 12 curriculum. Policy Futures in Education, 11(5), 549–563.
DesRoches, S. J. (2015). An education of shared fates: Recasting citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(6), 537–549.
Dikkers, A. G. (2013). Family connections: Building connections among home, school, and community: Susan Catapano, editor. Childhood Education, 89(2), 115–116.
Drori, G. S. (2018). Glocalization: A critical introduction. Contemporary Sociology, 47(4), 493–495.
Enriquez, V. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: the Philippine experience. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Faist, T. (2009). Diversity – A new mode of incorporation? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1), 171–190.
Frederico, M., & Whiteside, M. (2016). Building school, family, and community partnerships: Developing a theoretical framework. Australian Social Work, 69(1), 51–66.
Gardner-McTaggart, A., & Palmer, N. (2018). Global citizenship education, technology, and being. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(2), 268–281.
Giroux, H. (1984). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. In Kaleidoscope: Contemporary and classic readings in education (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 11–22).
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2006). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.
Goren, H., & Yemini, M. (2017). Global citizenship education redefined–A systematic review of empirical studies on global citizenship education. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 170–183.
Grenfell, M. J. (Ed.). (2014). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Hampden-Thompson, G., Jeffes, J., Lord, P., Bramley, G., Davies, I., Tsouroufli, M., & Sundaram, V. (2015). Teachers’ views on students’ experiences of community involvement and citizenship education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 10(1), 67–78.
Hoskins, B., & Van Nijlen, D. (2006). Active citizenship for democracy. Ispra: CRELL.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash, (HKS Working Paper No. RWPI6-026). https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1401.
Jakupec, V. (2018). The rise of populism. In Development aid – Populism and the end of the neoliberal agenda (SpringerBriefs in philosophy, pp. 1–18). Cham: Springer.
Jefferess, D. (2016). Cosmopolitan appropriation or learning? Relation and action in global citizenship education. In I. Longran & T. Birk (Eds.), Globalization and global citizenship (pp. 103–114). London: Routledge.
Joppke, C. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: Theory and policy. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 237–257.
Lindsay, C. (2014). School and community. Elsevier. London: Pergamon Press.
Losada, E. (2010). Teacher Community Partnership, Teacher Induction Program, Department of Education of the Philippines.
Maca, M., & Morris, P. (2015). Education, national identity and state formation in modern Philippines. In E. Vickers & K. Kumar, K. (Eds.), Constructing modern Asian citizenship (pp. 125–148). London: Routledge.
Martino, W. (2009). Teachers as role models. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (Springer International Handbook of Education, Vol. 21, pp. 755–768). Boston: Springer.
Mendoza, R. J., & Nakayama, S. (2003). Makabayan curriculum for secondary schools in the Philippines: The development of citizenship. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2(1), 13–26.
Muff, A., & Bekerman, Z. (2017). Agents of the nation-state or transformative intellectuals? Exploring the conflicting roles of civics teachers in Israel. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1746197917743752.
Nieto, D. (2018). Citizenship education discourses in Latin America: Multilateral institutions and the decolonial challenge. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(3), 432–450.
Peterson, A., Durrant, I., & Bentley, B. (2015). Student teachers’ perceptions of their role as civic educators: Evidence from a large higher education institution in England. British Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 343–364.
Print, M. (2012). Teacher pedagogy and achieving citizenship competences in schools. In M. Print & D. Lange (Eds.), Schools, curriculum and civic education for building democratic citizens (Civic and political education, Vol. 2, pp. 113–128). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Professional Regulatory Commission of the Philippines. (1997). Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers of the Philippines (Resolution No. 435, 1997) Citation. Board for Professional Teachers. Manila.
Redillas, S. (2017). Exploring Filipino teachers’ identity and community engagements. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
Reid, A. D., Davies, I., & Evans, M. (2008). Globalising citizenship education? A critique of ‘global education’ and ‘citizenship education’. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts (2002).
Roma-Sianturi, D. (2009). “Pedagogic Invasion”: The Thomasites in Occupied Philippines, Kritika Kultura, no. 12, pp. 5–26.
San Juan, E., Jr. (2001). Interrogating transmigrancy, remapping diaspora: The globalization of laboring Filipinos/as. Discourse, 23(3), 52–74.
Schuitema, J., Radstake, H., van de Pol, J., & Veugelers, W. (2018). Guiding classroom discussions for democratic citizenship education. Educational Studies, 44(4), 377–407.
Schwartz, K. (1971). Filipino Education and Spanish Colonialism: Toward an Autonomous Perspective. Comparative Education Review, 15(2), 202–218.
Sim, J. B. Y. (2011). ‘Simple ideological “dupes” of national governments’? Teacher agency and citizenship education in Singapore. In K. J. Kennedy, W. O. Lee, & D. L. Grossman (Eds.), Citizenship pedagogies in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 221–242). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sklad, M., Friedman, J., Park, E., & Oomen, B. (2016). ‘Going glocal’: A qualitative and quantitative analysis of global citizenship education at a Dutch liberal arts and sciences college. Higher Education, 72(3), 323–340.
Steinmetz, G. (2011). Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology, Cultural sociology, 5(1), 45–66.
Stevenson, N. (2003). Cultural citizenship in the ‘cultural’ society: A cosmopolitan approach. Citizenship Studies, 7(3), 331–348.
Stitzlein, S. M. (2015). Teaching for dissent: Citizenship education and political activism. London: Routledge.
Torres, C. A. (2017). Theoretical and empirical foundations of critical global citizenship education. Taylor & Francis. New York: Routledge.
UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all: (Global education monitoring report). Paris: UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all (Education for All global monitoring report). Paris: UNESCO.
Veugelers, W. (2011). A humanist perspective on moral development and citizenship education. In Education and humanism: linking autonomy and humanity (pp. 9–34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Waterson, R. A., & Moffa, E. D. (2016). Citizenship education for proactive democratic life in rural communities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11(3), 213–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Redillas, S. (2019). Filipino Teachers’ Identity: Framed by Community Engagements, Challenges for Citizenship Education. In: Peterson, A., Stahl, G., Soong, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_11-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67905-1_11-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67905-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67905-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education