Skip to main content

Eye Movement Traits in Differentiating Experts and Laymen

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Man-Machine Interactions 5 (ICMMI 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 659))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is much research indicating that eye tracking methods are a promising approach which can be used in revealing experts’ visual patterns and acquiring information regarding their subconscious behaviour while making decisions in professional tasks. The studies presented in this paper extend the aforementioned investigations and were aimed at checking the possibility of differentiating experts and laymen based on their eye movement characteristics. For this purpose, an experiment in the radiology field was chosen. The studies revealed not only significant differences between visual patterns of the analysed groups but also demonstrated that distinguishing experts from novices based on their eye movements is feasible. The classification performance was high and, dependent on the method applied for defining the test set, amounted to 85% or 93% correctly-classified subjects. The investigation concerning the possibility of recognizing who was performing the experiment task—an expert or layman—showed that dependent on the radiology image explored—the performance in the majority of cases was between 79% and 93%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bekkar, M., Djemaa, H.K., Alitouche, T.A.: Evaluation measures for models assessment over imbalanced data sets. J. Inf. Eng. Appl. 3(10), 27–38 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernal, J., Sánchez, F.J., Vilariño, F., Arnold, M., Ghosh, A., Lacey, G.: Experts vs. novices: applying eye-tracking methodologies in colonoscopy video screening for polyp search. In: ETRA 2014, Safety Harbor, USA, pp. 223–226 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cerrolaza, J.J., Villanueva, A., Cabeza, R.: Study of polynomial mapping functions in video-oculography eye trackers. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 19(2), 10:1–10:25 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F.: A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24(01), 38–49 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Gijp, A., Ravesloot, C., Jarodzka, H., van der Schaaf, M., van der Schaaf, I., van Schaik, J., ten Cate, T.J.: How visual search relates to visual diagnostic performance: a narrative systematic review of eye-tracking research in radiology. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 22, 1–23 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harezlak, K., Kasprowski, P.: Evaluating quality of dispersion based fixation detection algorithm. In: ISCIS 2014, Krakow, Poland, pp. 97–104 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harezlak, K., Kasprowski, P., Stasch, M.: Towards accurate eye tracker calibration-methods and procedures. Procedia Comput. Sci. 35, 1073–1081 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., Van de Weijer, J.: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kasprowski, P., Harezlak, K., Stasch, M.: Guidelines for the eye tracker calibration using points of regard. In: Piȩtka, E., Kawa, J., Wieclawek, W. (eds.) Information Technologies in Biomedicine, Volume 4, AISC, vol. 284, pp. 225–236. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, R.S.A., Tien, G., Atkins, M.S., Zheng, B., Panton, O.N.M., Meneghetti, A.T.: Analysis of eye gaze: do novice surgeons look at the same location as expert surgeons during a laparoscopic operation? Surg. Endosc. 26(12), 3536–3540 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai, M.L., Tsai, M.J., Yang, F.Y., Hsu, C.Y., Liu, T.C., Lee, S.W.Y., Lee, M.H., Chiou, G.L., Liang, J.C., Tsai, C.C.: A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educ. Res. Rev. 10, 90–115 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nivala, M., Hauser, F., Mottok, J., Gruber, H.: Developing visual expertise in software engineering: an eye tracking study. In: EDUCON 2016, pp. 613–620. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Panchuk, D., Vine, S., Vickers, J.N.: Eye tracking methods in sport expertise. In: J. Baker, D. Farrow (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Sport Expertise, Routledge, pp. 176–187 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Provost, F.J., Fawcett, T.: Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: comparison under imprecise class and cost distributions. In: KDD 1997, vol. 97, Newport Beach, pp. 43–48 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reingold, E.M., Sheridan, H.: Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine. In: Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements, pp. 528–550 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salvucci, D.D., Goldberg, J.H.: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: ETRA 2000, Palm Beach Gardens, USA, pp. 71–78 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schulz, C., Schneider, E., Fritz, L., Vockeroth, J., Hapfelmeier, A., Brandt, T., Kochs, E., Schneider, G.: Visual attention of anaesthetists during simulated critical incidents. Br. J. Anaesth. 106(6), 807–813 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The eye tribe: the eye tribe system (2016). theeyetribe.com. Accessed Mar 2017

  19. Yang, J.H., Kennedy, Q., Sullivan, J., Ronald, D., Fricker, J.: Scan patterns on overland navigation in varying route difficulty: is total-flight-hours (TFH) a good measure of expertise? In: HFES 2012, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1406–1410 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper was partially supported by the Silesian University of Technology Rector’s Pro-Quality Grant 02/020/RGJ17/0103 and by the Silesian University of Technology grant BK/263/RAu2/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Harezlak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harezlak, K., Kasprowski, P., Kasprowska, S. (2018). Eye Movement Traits in Differentiating Experts and Laymen. In: Gruca, A., Czachórski, T., Harezlak, K., Kozielski, S., Piotrowska, A. (eds) Man-Machine Interactions 5. ICMMI 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 659. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67792-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67792-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67791-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67792-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics