Abstract
Understanding the fundamental processes underlying the microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can provide valuable insights in recognizing the key limiting factors, the scope of improvement of the system which in turn helps in the scaling-up the process. The science behind an MFC is complex and it involves a subtle interplay of various fields such as microbiology, physics and electrochemistry (Zhang and Halme 1995). A comprehensive understanding of various parameters involved in the process is essential for the improvement of power generation and to explore further applications. Modelling the system prior to experimentation can provide various perspectives and alternatives saving time and money. The physics of the process can be understood using quantitative predictions using modelling. It also provides valuable information about the dynamics of a process and thus important in reactor design and scale-up. Consequently, efficient monitoring of the process as well as precise control may be achieved through modelling (Marcus et al. 2007). Multi-scale modelling is crucial for a well-defined understanding of the process at both micro and macro scales.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chae, K., Choi, M., Ajayi, F., & Park, W. (2008). Mass transport through a proton exchange membrane (nafion) in microbial fuel cells. Energy & Fuels, 22, 169–176.
Christgen, B., Scott, K., Dolfing, J., Head, I. M., & Curtis, T. P. (2015). An evaluation of the performance and economics of membranes and separators in single chamber MFCs treating domestic wastewater. PloS One, 10, e0136108.
Garg, A., Vijayaraghavan, V., Mahapatra, S. S., Tai, K., & Wong, C. H. (2014). Performance evaluation of MFC by artificial intelligence methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 1389–1399.
Harnisch, F., Warmbier, R., Schneider, R., & Schröder, U. (2009). Modeling the ion transfer and polarization of ion exchange membranes in bioelectrochemical systems. Bioelectrochemistry, 75, 136–141.
Logan, B. E., Hamelers, B., Rozendal, R., Schroder, U., Keller, J., Freguia, S., Aelterman, P., Verstraete, W., & Rabaey, K. (2006). MFCs: Methodology and technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(17), 5181–5192.
Lovley, D. R. (2006). Bug juice: Harvesting electricity with microorganisms. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 4, 497–508.
Marcus, A. K., Torres, C. I., & Rittmann, B. E. (2007). Conduction-based modeling of the biofilm anode of an MFC. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 98, 1171–1182.
Merkey, B. V., & Chopp, D. L. (2012). The performance of an MFC depends strongly on anode geometry: A multidimensional modeling study. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 74, 834–857.
Picioreanu, C., Katuri, K. P., Head, I. M., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Scott, K. (2008). Mathematical model for MFCs with anodic biofilms and anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology, 57(7), 965–971.
Picioreanu, C., Katuri, K. P., Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Head, I. M., & Scott, K. (2010). Modelling MFCs with suspended cells and added electron transfer mediator. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 40, 151–162.
Renslow, R., Donovan, C., Shim, M., Babauta, J. T., Nannapaneni, S., Schenk, J., & Beyenal, H. (2011). Oxygen reduction kinetics on graphite cathodes in sediment MFCs. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13, 21573–21584.
Stratford, J. P., Beecroft, N. J., Slade, R. C. T., Greening, A., & Avignone-Rossa, C. (2014). Anodic microbial community diversity as a predictor of the power output of MFCs. Bioresource Technology, 156, 84–91.
Tardast, A., Rahimnejad, M., Najafpour, G., Ghoreyshi, A., Premier, G. C., Bakeri, G., & Oh, S. E. (2014). Use of artificial neural network for the prediction of bioelectricity production in a membraneless MFC. Fuel, 117, 697–703.
Wang, X., Feng, Y. J., & Lee, H. (2008). Electricity production from beer brewery wastewater using single chamber MFC. Water Science and Technology, 57, 1117–1121.
Xu, J., Sheng, G.-P., Luo, H.-W., Li, W.-W., Wang, L.-F., & Yu, H.-Q. (2012). Fouling of proton exchange membrane (PEM) deteriorates the performance of MFC. Water Research, 46, 1817–1824.
Yan, M., & Fan, L. (2013). Constant voltage output in two-chamber MFC under fuzzy pid control. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 8, 3321–3332.
Zhang, X. C., & Halme, A. (1995). Modelling of a MFC process. Biotechnology Letters, 17, 809–814.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veerubhotla, R., Dutta, S.K., Chakraborty, S. (2018). Modelling of Reaction and Transport in Microbial Fuel Cells. In: Das, D. (eds) Microbial Fuel Cell. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66793-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66793-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66792-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66793-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)