Skip to main content

How Not to Think Like Dante Alighieri: Guilt, Punishment and the Components of Dantean Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empathetic Space on Screen
  • 49k Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the individual elements and devices of Dantean space that appear in Dante’s precursors in the Western canon from Aeschylus to the Psychomachia. Singling out six attributes, it then asks whether Dantean Space is committed to an alienating aesthetic of guilt and punishment. Distinguishing Judicial pleasure (the judging of actual people in life) from Juridical pleasure (the judging of characters who get their ‘just’ deserts at a story’s end), it interrogates the juridical pleasures of Dantean space. With that in mind, the essay explores such questions as: is it a coincidence that Dante’s landscape is so marked by alienated, atomized, misanthropic characters who are trapped within themselves by themselves? Does Dantean space carry a sense of self that necessarily imposes certain forms of alienation, teaching us to see ourselves and others in a specifically anti-social way? What are the effects of consuming narratives that deploy Dantean space? In short, is Dantean space bad for us?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aeschylus. 1971. Agamemnon, The Orestaia, trans. Robert Fagles. London : Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alighieri, Dante. 2006. The Divine Comedy, trans. and ed. Robin Kirkpatrick. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1986. Poetics, trans. A. Sullivan. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Adamo, Amedeo. 2013. Dantean Space in the Cities of Cinema. In Media and the City: Urbanism, Technology and Communication, ed. Simone Tosoni, Matteo Tarantino, and Chiara Giaccardi. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euripides. 2014. The Bacchae. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eustathius. 2010. Eustathii Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem. Cambridge: Cambridge Library Collection—Classics, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sue. 2013. On Anger. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pausanius. 2014. Complete Works. Delphi Classics, Amazon electronic editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophocles. 1984. Oedipus Rex. In The Three Theban Plays, trans. Robert Fagles. London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amedeo D’Adamo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

D’Adamo, A. (2018). How Not to Think Like Dante Alighieri: Guilt, Punishment and the Components of Dantean Space. In: Empathetic Space on Screen. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66772-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics