Abstract
The Interactive Model-Centric Systems Engineering research effort is interested in developing knowledge necessary to leverage the increasing involvement of computational models in system design. A key activity in such model-centric environments is the selection and usage of models to generate data for decision making. Extending work from prior demonstrations, this paper presents a case study where insights are gained via usage and comparison of multiple models. The results highlight the need to explore how model choice and trade-off can impact the attractiveness of alternative systems. Sixteen tradespaces of cost-benefit data are generated via combined pairwise usage of four alternative evaluative models (performance and cost calculations) and four alternative value models (calculating the “goodness” of different levels of performance and cost). These tradespaces are used to determine attractive Pareto efficient Space Tug vehicles, as well as insights that are less sensitive to model choice. No best model is shown, but rather different models provide insights into different aspects of the system evaluation and valuation activity. Two categories of insights are highlighted: patterns in the structure of the decision problem (i.e., how “value” is defined and what systems might be feasible) and artifacts of the models themselves (i.e., how to mitigate against misleading results due to model abstractions).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Curry M, Ross AM (2016) Designing system value sustainment using interactive epoch-era analysis: a case study for on-orbit servicing vehicles. 14th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Huntsville, AL, March 2016
McManus H, Schuman T (2003) Understanding the orbital transfer vehicle trade space. AIAA Space 2003, Long Beach, CA; September 2003
Ross AM, Rhodes DH, Fitzgerald ME (2015) Interactive value model trading for resilient systems decisions. 13th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Hoboken, March 2015
Ross AM, Fitzgerald ME, Rhodes DH (2016) Interactive evaluative model trading for resilient systems decisions. 14th Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Huntsville, March 2016
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Matthew Fitzgerald for prior work. This material is based upon work supported, in whole or in part, by the US Department of Defense through the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) under Contract HQ0034-13-D-0004. SERC is a federally funded University Affiliated Research Center managed by the Stevens Institute of Technology. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Department of Defense.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ross, A.M., Rhodes, D.H. (2018). Interactive Model Trading for Resilient Systems Decisions. In: Madni, A., Boehm, B., Ghanem, R., Erwin, D., Wheaton, M. (eds) Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62216-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62217-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)