Skip to main content

The Flexibility of Generic Architectures: Lessons from the Human Nervous System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research

Abstract

Many engineered systems are biologically inspired. In this paper, we examine the structure of the human nervous system with an eye toward understanding how its internal architecture may inform the design of large-scale engineered systems. Specifically, we examine four types of “generic” architectures – tree-structured hierarchies, layered hierarchies, diffuse networks, and teams. We observe all four types of these hierarchies in the human nervous system. Consistent with prior theory, tree-structured hierarchies are relatively inflexible, but simple and easy to control. Layered hierarchies are moderately flexible, more complex, yet still largely controllable. Diffuse networks are easy to describe and therefore relatively simple yet flexible; however, they can lead to unexpected emergent behaviors undermining controllability. Finally, team structures are extremely flexible, but can lead to instabilities. Implications for system design are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cohen J, Stewart I (2000) The collapse of chaos: discovering simplicity in a complex world. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broniatowski DA, Moses J (2016) Measuring flexibility, descriptive complexity, and rework potential in generic system architectures. Syst Eng 19(3):207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tisue S, Wilensky U (2004) Netlogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity. In: International conference on complex systems [Internet]. Boston, pp 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfram S et al (1986) Theory and applications of cellular automata, vol 1. World scientific, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Aharony A, Stauffer D (2003) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Swanson LW (2012) Brain architecture: understanding the basic plan. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brodmann K (1909) Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Barth, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zamora-López G, Zhou C, Kurths J (2010) Cortical hubs form a module for multisensory integration on top of the hierarchy of cortical networks. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 4(1):1–1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richards W (2015) Anigrafs: experiments in cooperative cognitive architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richards W, Jepson A What is a Percept? University of Toronto, Dept. Computer Science, Tech. Report RBCV-TR-93-43

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hawkins J, Blakeslee S (2007) On intelligence. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mountcastle VB (1997) The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain 120(4):701–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballard DH (2015) Brain computation as hierarchical abstraction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Moses J (2009) The anatomy of large scale systems revisited. Available from: http://esd.mit.edu/symp09/submitted-papers/moses-paper.pdf

  15. Gick ML, Holyoak KJ (1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cogn Psychol 15(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spiro RJ, Vispoel WP, Schmitz JG, Samarapungavan A, Boerger AE, Britton BK, et al. (1987) Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. Executive control processes in reading pp 177–199

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson TA, Caldwell BW, Green MG (2015) Investigating spontaneous flexibility in concept generation. In: ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V007T06A012–V007T06A012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  19. De Weck OL, Roos D, Magee CL (2011) Engineering systems: meeting human needs in a complex technological world. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Broniatowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Broniatowski, D.A., Moses, J. (2018). The Flexibility of Generic Architectures: Lessons from the Human Nervous System. In: Madni, A., Boehm, B., Ghanem, R., Erwin, D., Wheaton, M. (eds) Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62216-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62217-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics