Skip to main content

A Model Framework for Determining Dynamic Architecture Goals in a Systems-of-Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research

Abstract

This paper presents results from a prototype modeling methodology, part of a PhD project intending to create an integrated model framework relating societal modeling techniques to system-of-systems (SoS) architecture models and design. This framework uses matrix-based and system dynamics (SD) models to relate product system functions to associated systems and to societal dynamics step-by-step, in order to synthesize justified design priorities for a new product platform. In this manner, function importance weights or goal prioritization for a new product are obtained from societal models and scenarios. These weights are highly dependent on outside (SoS) functions, vary in time, and depend on the risk attitude of the project. In future work, this framework will be applied to modularization and architecture design and evaluated by a case study in the aerospace industry, where a space system manufacturer is considering designing new satellite product lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crawley E, Cameron B, Selva D (2015) System architecture: strategy and product development for complex systems, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maier MW (1996) Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. In: INCOSE International Symposium, 6:565–573, Wiley Online Library

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen CB, Larsen PG, Fitzgerald J, Woodcock J, Peleska J (2015) Systems of systems engineering: basic concepts, model-based techniques, and research directions. ACM Comput Surv 48:18:1–18:41. doi:10.1145/2794381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SEBoK. http://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Guide_to_the_Systems_Engineering_Body_of_Knowledge_(SEBoK). Accessed 14 Feb 2016

  5. Lindemann U, Maurer M, Braun T (2009) Structural complexity management. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Browning TR (2016) Design structure matrix extensions and innovations: a survey and new opportunities. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 63:27–52. doi:10.1109/TEM.2015.2491283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oizumi K, Aoyama K (2013) Design orchestration composer–a model base enabling holistic management of product, design process, and organization. In: DS 75-3:design for harmonies, Vol. 3: Design organisation and management, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kasperek D, Maisenbacher S, Maurer M (2014) Structure–based compilation of system dynamics models for assessing engineering design process behavior. In International Systems Dynamics Conference, pp 233–242

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee S, Han W, Park Y (2015) Measuring the functional dynamics of product-service system: a system dynamics approach. Comput Ind Eng 80:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaishnav C, Choucri N, Clark D (2013) Cyber international relations as an integrated system. Environ Syst Decis 33:561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shove E, Southerton D (2000) Defrosting the freezer: from novelty to convenience anarrative of normalization. J Mater Cult 5:301–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2007) Product design and development, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wynn, DC, Wyatt DF, Nair SMT, Clarkson PJ (2010) An introduction to the Cambridge advanced modeller. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on modelling and management of engineering processes, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt MJ, Gary MS (2002) Combining system dynamics and conjoint analysis for strategic decision making with an automotive high-tech SME. Syst Dyn Rev 18:359–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weil HB (2007) Application of system dynamics to corporate strategy: an evolution of issues and frameworks. Syst Dyn Rev 23:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc-Andre Chavy-Macdonald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chavy-Macdonald, MA., Oizumi, K., Aoyama, K. (2018). A Model Framework for Determining Dynamic Architecture Goals in a Systems-of-Systems. In: Madni, A., Boehm, B., Ghanem, R., Erwin, D., Wheaton, M. (eds) Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62216-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62217-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics