Abstract
Despite the emerging recognition of the pivotal role played by professional agency within work contexts, little is known about how agency is promoted and enacted in organised work-related learning settings. This chapter focuses on the work conference as an orchestrated agency-promoting learning arena. We understand professional agency as a necessary precondition of work-related learning, and we emphasise the potential of work conferences to activate and promote such agency. Our empirical study investigated three work conferences in education and healthcare organisations in Finland. Utilising assessments, the investigation addressed how the participants perceived the conditions for learning and the learning outcomes in these conferences. The work conference was mostly viewed as a worthwhile learning arena. The conference advanced participants’ professional agency and participation across entrenched professional boundaries, and work-related learning occurred at both individual and collective levels. A comparison of the three work conferences indicated that in terms of the generation and actualisation of innovative developmental discussions, the most prominent learning outcomes occurred when the participants were able to enact substantial professional agency, when there was comprehensive participation from the work community, and when boundary crossing occurred. This paper contributes to the understanding of the conditions that impede or support work-related learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Alasoini, T. (2011). Workplace development as part of broad-based innovation policy: Exploiting and exploring three types of knowledge. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 1(1), 23–43.
Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324.
Billett, S. (2011). Subjectivity, self and personal agency in learning through and for work. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 60–72). London: Sage.
Billett, S., & Noble, C. (2017). Individuals’ mediation of learning professional practice: Co-working and learning to prescribe. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 205–227). Cham: Springer.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Multiple forms of professional agency for (non)crafting of work practices in hospital organisation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5(3), 63–83.
Collin, K., Lemmetty, S., Herranen, S., Paloniemi, S., Auvinen, T., & Riivari, E. (2017). Professional agency and creativity in information technology work. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 249–270). Cham: Springer.
Cairns, L., & Malloch, M. (2011). Theories of work, place and learning: New directions. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 3–16). London: Sage.
Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E. J., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2016). Design principles for hybrid learning configurations at the interface between school and workplace. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 309–334.
Davey, R. (2013). The professional identity of teacher educators: Career on the cusp? London: Routledge.
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.
Eraut, M. (2011). How researching learning at work can lead to tools for enhancing learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 181–197). London: Sage.
Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Emerging conceptualisations on professional agency and professional learning. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 183–201). Cham: Springer.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2014). Identity and agency in professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 645–672). Dordrecht: Springer.
Evans, K. (2017). Bounded agency in professional lives. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 17–36). Cham: Springer.
Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227–243.
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2011). Workplace learning and the organization. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 46–59). London: Sage.
Goller, M., & Billett, S. (2014). Agentic behaviour at work: Crafting learning experiences. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the Boundary between learning and working (pp. 25–44). Dordrecht: Springer.
Goller, M., & Harteis, C. (2017). Human agency at work: Towards a clarification and operationalisation of the concept. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 85–103). Cham: Springer.
Gustavsen, B., & Engelstad, P. H. (1986). The design of conferences and the evolving role of democratic dialogue in changing working life. Human Relations, 39(2), 101–115.
Haapasaari, A., & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 37–47.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Harteis, C., & Goller, M. (2014). New skills for new jobs: Work agency as a necessary condition for successful lifelong learning. In S. Billett, T. Halttunen, & M. Koivisto (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning: International perspectives and practices (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
Heiskanen, T., & Heiskanen, H. (2011). Spaces of innovation: Experiences from two small high-tech firms. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(2), 97–116.
Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2014). Seeking new perspectives on the development of teacher education – A study of the Finnish context. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 39–52.
Hökkä, P., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2014). Agency-centred coupling – A better way to manage an educational organization? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(2), 131–153.
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Mahlakaarto, S. (2017a). Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity: Transforming marginality to strength. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 36–46.
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017b). The reciprocal relationship between emotions and agency in the workplace. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 161–181). Cham: Springer.
Hökkä, P. Rautiainen, M., Silander, T., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017c, forthcoming). Collective agency-promoting leadership in Finnish teacher education. In J. Murray, A. Swennen, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), International research, policy and practice in teacher education: Insider perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Imants, J., Wubbels, T., & Vermunt, J. D. (2013). Teachers’ enactment of workplace conditions and their beliefs and attitudes toward reform. Vocations and Learning, 6(3), 323–346.
Kalliola, S., & Nakari, R. (2007). Renewing occupational cultures – Bridging boundaries in learning spaces. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3–4), 190–203.
Kerosuo, H. (2017). Transformative agency and the development of knotworking in building design. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 331–349). Cham: Springer.
Kira, M. (2010). Routine-generating and regenerative workplace learning. Vocations and Learning, 3(1), 71–90.
Labone, E., & Long, J. (2016). Features of effective professional learning: A case study of the implementation of a system-based professional learning model. Professional Development in Education, 42(1), 54–77.
Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–819.
Lovett, S., Dempster, N., & Flűckiger, B. (2015). Personal agency in leadership learning using an Australian heuristic. Professional Development in Education, 41(1), 127–143.
Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84.
Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2017). Proactive employees: The relationship between work-related reflection and innovative work behaviour. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 141–159). Cham: Springer.
Paloniemi, S., & Collin, K. (2012). Discursive power and creativity in inter-professional work. Vocations and Learning, 5(1), 23–40.
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017). Teacher agency and professional learning communities: What can learning rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 318–333.
Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 615–623.
Tynjälä, P. (2013). Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning: A literature review. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 11–36.
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12.
Valleala, U., Herranen, S., Collin, K., & Paloniemi, S. (2015). Fostering learning opportunities through employee participation amid organizational change. Vocations and Learning, 8(1), 1–34.
Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3(1), 19–42.
Ylén, M. (2017). Professional virtues and agency at work: Ethnography of software developers. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work. Agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 291–310). Cham: Springer.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland [Grant number 288925, The Role of Emotions in Agentic Learning at Work]. We want to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments. We also want to thank Donald Adamson for polishing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A. (2017). An Agency-Promoting Learning Arena for Developing Shared Work Practices. In: Goller, M., Paloniemi, S. (eds) Agency at Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60942-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60943-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)