Skip to main content

Usability Model Based on Traditional Metrics and Physiological and Eye Tracking Variables Depending on User Profile

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 4266 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 607))

Abstract

Usability recommendations need to be checked with users, combining subjective methodologies with objective and quantitative approaches. The use of physiological response and eye tracking variables allowed detecting better the effect of usability recommendations and user profile. Moreover, some usability recommendations seems to have low effect on improving usability and even can difficult the interaction for users without functional limitaions. Finally, a model to assess the usability has been defined, which related web design parameters with objective variables and user perception, where task outcomes are key indicators for users without functional limitations while variables related with emotional response or behaviour are more important for users with motor disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lam, J., Lee, M.: Bridging the digital divide - the roles of internet self-efficacy towards learning computer and the internet among elderly in Hong Kong, China. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 266b (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leuthold, S., Bargas-Avila, J.A., Opwis, K.: Beyond web content accessibility guidelines: Design of enhanced text user interfaces for blind internet users. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66, 257–270 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen, J.: Breadcrumb navigation increasingly useful. Nielsen’s Alertbox (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hornbæk, K.: Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 64(2), 79–102 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laparra-Hernández, J., Belda-Lois, J.M., Medina, E., Campos, N., Poveda, R.: EMG and GSR signals for evaluating user’s perception of different types of ceramic flooring. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39(2), 326–332 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward, R.D., Marsden, P.H.: Physiological responses to different web page designs. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 59(1), 199–212 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazlett, R.: Measurement of user frustration: a biologic approach. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 734–735 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scheirer, J., Fernandez, R., Klein, J., Picard, R.: Frustrating the user on purpose: a step toward building an affective computer. Interact. Comput. 14(2), 93–118 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacob, R.J.K., Karn, K.S.: Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: ready to deliver the promises. Mind 2(3), 4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laparra-Hernández, J., Belda-Lois, J.M., Díaz-Pineda, J.E., Page, Á.: A multimodal web usability assessment based on traditional metrics, physiological response and eye-tracking analysis. In: Gamito, P., Rosa, P. (eds.) I See Me, You See Me: Inferring Cognitive and Emotional Processes from Gazing Behaviour, pp. 125–148. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Federov, V.V.: Theory of Optimal Experiments. Elsevier, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goos, P., Vandebroek, M.: D-optimal response surface designs in the presence of random block effects. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 37(4), 433–453 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Belda-Lois, J.M., de Rosario, H., Pons, R., Poved, R., Morón, A., Porcar, R.: Can human movement analysis contribute to usability understanding. Hum. Mov. Sci. 29(4), 529–541 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laparra-Hernández, J.: Evaluación de la Usabilidad Web mediante el análisis de la respuesta Fisiológica y el seguimiento de la mirada. Influencia del perfil de usuario. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ekanayake, H.B., Backlund, P., Ziemke, T., Ramberg, R., Hewagamage, K.P., Lebram, M.: Comparing expert and novice driving behavior in a driving simulator. Environments 4, 5 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yerkes, R.M., Dodson, J.D.: The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 18(5), 459–482 (1908)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Laparra-Hernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Laparra-Hernández, J., Belda-Lois, JM., Page, Á. (2018). Usability Model Based on Traditional Metrics and Physiological and Eye Tracking Variables Depending on User Profile. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60492-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics