Skip to main content

Usability of Enlargement Methods: How Enlargement Method Influences the Amount of Scrolling Actions Needed to Read Publications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability and User Experience (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 607))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4220 Accesses

Abstract

The two methods to enlarge text are: Geometric magnification (ZOOM) implemented with lenses, CCTV systems and Screen Magnification Systems, and Lexical Enlargement (WRAP), text enlargement with word wrapping that is implemented with software like word processors and web browsers. WRAP uses the lexical structure of language to wrap words. This paper will show that it takes many more scroll actions to read with ZOOM than WRAP whenever the ZOOM requires horizontal scrolling. Since all scrolling is overhead to the task of reading, ZOOM with horizontal scrolling is much less usable for reading text. Though costlier in scrolls than normal reading (27 to 1), WRAP is even effective at 84-point font when viewed on a 13-inch laptop. ZOOM at 700% enlargement requires 98 times more scrolls than normal reading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hallett, E., Roberts, Z., Sweet, J., Chan, M.L., Sun, Y., Dick, W., Vu, K-P.L: Computer accessibility: How individuals with low vision adjust the presentation of electronic text for academic reading. In: AHFE 2015 Conference Proceedings, pp. 1184–1191. Elsevier, Netherlands (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry, S.L.: Understanding users’ needs to customize text display (2014). http://www.tader.info/understanding.html

  3. Legge, G.E., Rubin, G.S., Pelli, D.G., Schleske, M.M.: Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision. Vis. Res. 25(2), 253–265 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marcotte, E.: Responsive Web Design. A List Apart (306) (2010). http://alistapart.com/article/responsive-web-design

  5. Meyer, E.: CSS Pocket Reference. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rollings, J.K.: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. Scholastic Inc., New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smiley, J.: The Man Who Invented The Computer. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trollope, A.: The Warden. Project Gutenberg. eBook #619 (1996). https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/619

  9. World Wide Web Consortium: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (2008). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne E. Dick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dick, W.E. (2018). Usability of Enlargement Methods: How Enlargement Method Influences the Amount of Scrolling Actions Needed to Read Publications. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds) Advances in Usability and User Experience. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60492-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics