Abstract
Celiac plexus block involves needle placement near or through the wall of the aorta. Injury to the aorta may be asymptomatic or produce a range of serious outcomes including rapid death. Data regarding the incidence of clinically significant injury are fragmentary, but the incidence is likely to be very low. Most prominent symptoms are sudden increase in abdominal pain and hypotension. The practitioner must be aware of this rare complication and be prepared to seek emergent vascular surgery consultation if it is suspected. Strategies for decreasing risk of aortic injury are uncertain but are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Singler RC. An improved technique for neurolysis of the celiac plexus. Anesthesiology. 1982;56:137–41.
Ischia S, Luzzani A, Ischia A, et al. A new approach to the neurolytic block of the celiac plexus: the transaortic technique. Pain. 1983;16:333–41.
Liebermann RP, Waldman SD. Celiac plexus neurolysis with the transaortic approach. Radiology. 1990;175:274–83.
Le Blanc JK, Al-Haddad M, McHenry L, et al. A prospective, randomized study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer: one injection or two? Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(6):1300–7.
Brogan SE. Interventional pain therapies. In: Fishman SM, Ballantyne JC, Rathmell JP, editors. Bonica’s management of pain. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 612.
Wong GY, Schroeder DR, Carns PE, et al. Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus block on pain relief, quality-of-life, and survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1092–9.
Bridenbaugh LD, Moore DC, Campbell DD. Management of upper abdominal cancer pain. JAMA. 1964;190:99–102.
Ischia S, Ischia A, Polati E, et al. Three posterior percutaneous celiac plexus block techniques. Anesthesiology. 1992;67:534–40.
Moore DC. Computed tomography eliminates paraplegia and/or death from neurolytic celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:483–4.
Ischia S, Polati E. Reply to Dr. Moore. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:484–6.
Moore DC. The dreaded complications from neurolytic celiac plexus blocks are preventable! Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:377–8.
Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Elwassief A, Paquin SC, et al. Fatal complications after endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:E267.
Kambadakone A, Thabet A, Gervais DA, et al. CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: a review of anatomy, indications, technique, and tips for successful treatment. Radiographics. 2011;31:1599–621.
Noble M, Gress FG. Techniques and results of neurolysis for chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer pain. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006;8:99–103.
Kaufman M, Singh G, Das S, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus block neurolysis for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:127–34.
O’Toole TM, Schmulewitz N. Complication rates of EUS-guided celiac plexus blockade and neurolysis: results of a large case series. Endoscopy. 2009;41:593–7.
Oh SY, Irani S, Kozarek RA. What are the current and potential future roles for endoscopic ultrasound in the treatment of pancreatic cancer? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;10:319–29.
Poruk KE, Wolfgang CL. Palliative management of unresectable pancreas cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25:327–37.
Warner NS, Moeschler SM, Warner MA, et al. Bleeding complications in patients undergoing celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:488–93.
Loukas M, Klaasen Z, Merbs W, et al. A review of the thoracic splanchnic nerves and celiac ganglia. Clin Anat. 2010;23:512–22.
Wang ZJ, Webb EM, Westphalen AC, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomographic appearance of celiac ganglia. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(3):343–7.
Zhang XM, Zhao QH, Zeng NL, et al. The celiac ganglia: anatomic study using MRI in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1520–3.
Malayeri AA, Natori S, Bahrami H, et al. Relation of aortic wall thickness and distensibility to cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:491–6.
Szilagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliott JP, et al. Translumbar aortography: a study of its safety and usefulness. Arch Surg. 1977;112:399–408.
Kaplan R, Schiff-Keren B, Alt E. Aortic dissection as a complication of celiac plexus block. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:632–5.
Trimarchi S, Tsai T, Eagle KA, et al. Acute abdominal aortic dissection: insight from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:913–9.
Jonker FH, Schlosser FJ, Moll FL, et al. Dissection of the abdominal aorta. Current evidence and implications for treatment strategies: a review and meta-analysis of 92 patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:71–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagner, R.L. (2018). Aortic Dissection After Celiac Plexus Block. In: Anitescu, M., Benzon, H., Wallace, M. (eds) Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60070-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60072-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)