Skip to main content

IRT Observed-Score Equating with the Nonequivalent Groups with Covariates Design

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 196))

Abstract

Nonequivalent groups with anchor test (NEAT) design is typically preferred in test score equating, but there are tests which do not administer an anchor test. If the groups are nonequivalent, an equivalent groups (EG) design cannot be recommended. Instead, one can use a nonequivalent groups with covariates (NEC) design. The overall aim of this work was to propose the use of item response theory (IRT) with a NEC design by incorporating the mixed-measurement IRT with covariates model within IRT observed-score equating in order to model both test scores and covariates. Both simulations and a real test example are used to examine the proposed test equating method in comparison with traditional IRT observed-score equating methods with an EG design and a NEAT design. The results show that the proposed method can be used in practice, and the simulations show that the standard errors of the equating are lower with the proposed method as compared with traditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACT, ACT Technical Manual (ACT, Iowa City, IA, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Bränberg, M. Wiberg, Observed score linear equating with covariates. J. Educ. Meas. 48(4), 419–440 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Efron, R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman Hall, New York, NY, 1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Gnaldi, S. Bacci, Joint assessment of the latent trait dimensionality and observable differential item functioning of students' national tests. Qual. Quant. 50(4), 1429–1447 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. González, M. Wiberg, A.A. von Davier, A note on the Poisson’s binomial distribution in item response theory. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 40(4), 302–310 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Holland, H. Wainer, Differential Item Functioning (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hsu, K. Wu, J. Yu, M. Lee, Exploring the feasibility of collateral information test equating. Int. J. Test. 2(1), 1–14 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kolen, R. Brennan, Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Method and Practice, 3rd edn. (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Liou, P.E. Cheng, M. Li, Estimating comparable scores using surrogate variables. Appl. Meas. Educ. 25(2), 197–207 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • N.T. Longford, Equating without an anchor for nonequivalent groups of examinees. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 40(3), 227–253 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Lord, M.S. Wingersky, Comparison of IRT true-score and equipercentile observed-score "equatings". Appl. Psychol. Meas. 8, 452–461 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.-E. Lyrén, R.K. Hambleton, Consequences of violated the equating assumptions under the equivalent group design. Int. J. Test. 36(5), 308–323 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Quenette, W.A. Nicewander, G.L. Thomasson, Model-based versus empirical equating of test forms. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 30, 167–182 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Development Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2016.) http://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Tay, D. Newman, J.K. Vermunt, Item response theory with covariates (IRT-C): assessing item recovery and differential item functioning for the three-parameter logistic model. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 76(1), 22–42 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Wiberg, K. Bränberg, Kernel equating under the non-equivalent groups with covariates design. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 39(5), 349–361 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Wiberg, J. González, Statistical assessment of estimated transformations in observed-score equating. J. Educ. Meas. 53(1), 106–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. González, M. Wiberg Applying Test Equating Methods Using R (Springer, Berlin, 2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51824-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • N.K. Wright, N.J. Dorans, Using the Selection Variable for Matching or Equating (ETS Research Report RR-93–04) (Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research in this paper by Marie Wiberg was funded by the Swedish Research Council grant: 2014-578.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Sansivieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sansivieri, V., Wiberg, M. (2017). IRT Observed-Score Equating with the Nonequivalent Groups with Covariates Design. In: van der Ark, L.A., Wiberg, M., Culpepper, S.A., Douglas, J.A., Wang, WC. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 196. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56294-0_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics