Skip to main content

Questions on Uncertain, Possible, and Probable

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On the Logos: A Naïve View on Ordinary Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 354))

  • 442 Accesses

Abstract

In plain language, the predicative words “possible” and “probable” are often used synonymously, but without argument for it, and what seems more suitable is to say of something probable that it is possible, but not reciprocally. In language, “possible” seems to be more largely applicable than “probable”. For instance, if when throwing a single die it is probable to get five points, it is clear that it can be expected because this output is among “those that are possible”; obtaining eleven points is not possible, and consequently there is no sense in attributing to it the property of being probable. In addition, there are also life’s ordinary situations linguistically qualified as “possible but not probable”, even if they can actually have a very small probability. For instance, it is possible that in a few minutes my old friend John, 10 years older than I am, and from whom I have heard nothing in the last 10 years, can call me by phone, but it deserves to be qualified as something improbable or, at most and if John is still alive, with a very small probability provided it could be effectively computed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E. Trillas, Some uncertain reflections on uncertainty. Arch. Philos. Hist. Soft. Comput 1, 1–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Castiñeira, S. Cubillo, E. Trillas, On possibility and probability in finite Boolean algebras. Soft. Comput 7(2), 89–96 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Roeper, H. Leblanc, Probability Theory and Probability Semantics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. B. De Finetti, Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità. Fundamenta Mathematicae. XVII, 298–329 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.S. Roberts, A note on Fine’s axioms for qualitative probability. Ann. Probab 1(3), 484–487 (1973)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Trillas, Relational probabilities in intuitionistic lattices. Stochastica 12(2-3), 85–102 (1988)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Esteva, On the structure of intuitionistic algebras with relational probabilities. Stochastica 12(2-3), 103–111 (1988)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—Part I. Inf. Sci 8, 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Trillas, L. Eciolaza, Fuzzy Logic (Springer, Berlin, 2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Gudder, What is fuzzy probability theory? Found. Phys 30(10), 1663–1678 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Guadarrama, E. Renedo, E. Trillas, A First Inquiry on Semantic-Based Models of And, eds. by R. Seising et al. Accuracy and Fuzziness (2015), pp. 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.A. Zadeh, Probability measures of fuzzy events. J. Math. Anal. Appl 23, 421–427 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Weley, G. de Cooman, A behavioural model for linguistic uncertainty. Inf. Sci 134(1–4), 1–37 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enric Trillas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trillas, E. (2017). Questions on Uncertain, Possible, and Probable. In: On the Logos: A Naïve View on Ordinary Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56053-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56053-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56052-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56053-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics