Abstract
In plain language, the predicative words “possible” and “probable” are often used synonymously, but without argument for it, and what seems more suitable is to say of something probable that it is possible, but not reciprocally. In language, “possible” seems to be more largely applicable than “probable”. For instance, if when throwing a single die it is probable to get five points, it is clear that it can be expected because this output is among “those that are possible”; obtaining eleven points is not possible, and consequently there is no sense in attributing to it the property of being probable. In addition, there are also life’s ordinary situations linguistically qualified as “possible but not probable”, even if they can actually have a very small probability. For instance, it is possible that in a few minutes my old friend John, 10 years older than I am, and from whom I have heard nothing in the last 10 years, can call me by phone, but it deserves to be qualified as something improbable or, at most and if John is still alive, with a very small probability provided it could be effectively computed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
E. Trillas, Some uncertain reflections on uncertainty. Arch. Philos. Hist. Soft. Comput 1, 1–16 (2013)
E. Castiñeira, S. Cubillo, E. Trillas, On possibility and probability in finite Boolean algebras. Soft. Comput 7(2), 89–96 (2002)
L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1, 3–28 (1978)
P. Roeper, H. Leblanc, Probability Theory and Probability Semantics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1999)
B. De Finetti, Sul significato soggettivo della probabilità. Fundamenta Mathematicae. XVII, 298–329 (1931)
F.S. Roberts, A note on Fine’s axioms for qualitative probability. Ann. Probab 1(3), 484–487 (1973)
E. Trillas, Relational probabilities in intuitionistic lattices. Stochastica 12(2-3), 85–102 (1988)
F. Esteva, On the structure of intuitionistic algebras with relational probabilities. Stochastica 12(2-3), 103–111 (1988)
L.A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—Part I. Inf. Sci 8, 199–249 (1975)
E. Trillas, L. Eciolaza, Fuzzy Logic (Springer, Berlin, 2015)
S. Gudder, What is fuzzy probability theory? Found. Phys 30(10), 1663–1678 (2000)
S. Guadarrama, E. Renedo, E. Trillas, A First Inquiry on Semantic-Based Models of And, eds. by R. Seising et al. Accuracy and Fuzziness (2015), pp. 331–350
L.A. Zadeh, Probability measures of fuzzy events. J. Math. Anal. Appl 23, 421–427 (1968)
P. Weley, G. de Cooman, A behavioural model for linguistic uncertainty. Inf. Sci 134(1–4), 1–37 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trillas, E. (2017). Questions on Uncertain, Possible, and Probable. In: On the Logos: A Naïve View on Ordinary Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56053-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56053-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56052-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56053-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)