Skip to main content

[A] Novel Should Be the Biography of a Man or of an Affair, and a Biography, Whether of a Man or an Affair, Should Be a Novel.” Ford Madox Ford and Modernist Experiments in Biography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experiments in Life-Writing

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Life Writing ((PSLW))

  • 739 Accesses

Abstract

Starting from Catherine Belsey’s recent interpretation of Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier, Saunders reads Ford’s Joseph Conrad: A Personal Remembrance—a highly experimental memoir, a novel, and an exercise in modernist literary impressionism—as an example of Lyotard’s concept of the postmodern within modernism, on three counts: the self-awareness of its theoretical discussion; the foregrounding of the book’s own fictionality; and its exploration of the relation between writing and subjectivity, articulated especially as it oscillates between biography and autobiography. The latter can be seen in Ford’s sustained use of “the writer” instead of the first person; in Conrad’s notion of the collaborations appearing to issue from “a third person”; and in Ford’s use of the first-person plural to recount his experience of Conrad’s narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belsey, Catherine. “The Good Soldier: Ford’s Postmodern Novel.” In Ford Madox Ford’s “The Good Soldier”: Centenary Essays, International Ford Madox Ford Studies 14, eds. Max Saunders and Sara Haslam, 31–45. Leiden and Boston: Brill and Rodopi, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brebach, Raymond. “Conrad, Ford and the Romance Poem.” Modern Philology 81 (2) (Nov 1983): 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Jessie. Letter to the editor. T. L. S. December 4, 1924, 826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Ford Madox. Ancient Lights. London: Chapman and Hall, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Ford Madox. Joseph Conrad: A Personal Remembrance. London: Duckworth, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Ford Madox. Return to Yesterday. London: Gollancz, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Ford Madox. The Good Soldier, ed. Max Saunders. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David D. Ford Madox Ford: 1873–1939: A Bibliography of Works and Criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueffer, Francis.The Troubadours: A History of Provençal Life and Literature in the Middle Ages. London: Chatto and Windus, 1878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermode, Frank. “Recognition and Deception.” In Essays on Fiction, 92–113. London: Routledge, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, Elena. “Writing History: Ford and the Debate on ‘Objective Truth’ in the Late 20th Century.” In History and Representation in Ford Madox Ford’s Writings, International Ford Madox Ford Studies 3, ed. Joseph Wiesenfarth, 99–110. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. “Réponse à la question: qu’est-ce que le postmoderne?” Critique 419 (April, 1982): 357–367. “Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism?,” trans. Régis Durand. In The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, 71–82. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Roger. “The Real Plot Line of Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier: An Essay in Applied Deconstruction.” Textual Practice 4 (3) (Winter 1990): 391–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Roger. “The Unknown Ford Madox Ford.” In Ford Madox Ford’s Modernity, International Ford Madox Ford Studies 2, ed. Robert Hampson and Max Saunders, 117–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Max. Ford Madox Ford: A Dual Life, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Max. Self Impression: Life-Writing, Autobiografiction and the Forms of Modern Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard, Martin. “Tales of Passion.” Studies in the Novel 39 (1) (2007): 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachey, Lytton. Eminent Victorians. London: Chatto and Windus, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfarth, Joseph. “Ford’s Joseph Conrad: A Personal Remembrance as Metafiction: Or, How Conrad Became an Elizabethan Poet.” Renascence 53 (1) (2000): 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Saunders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saunders, M. (2017). “[A] Novel Should Be the Biography of a Man or of an Affair, and a Biography, Whether of a Man or an Affair, Should Be a Novel.” Ford Madox Ford and Modernist Experiments in Biography. In: Boldrini, L., Novak, J. (eds) Experiments in Life-Writing. Palgrave Studies in Life Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55414-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics