Abstract
Thin beams and panels subjected to large loadings will behave nonlinearly due to membrane stretch effects as they approach deflections on the order of their thickness; this behavior can be efficiently and accurately modeled using nonlinear reduced order models based on the structure’s linear normal modes. However, the complexity of such reduced order models grows cubically with the number of linear modes in the basis set, making complicated geometries prohibitively expensive to compute. Component mode synthesis techniques may be used to reduce this cost by assembling a set of smaller nonlinear subcomponent models, each of which can be more quickly computed than a nonlinear model of the entire structure. Since geometric nonlinearity is heavily dependent on each structure’s boundary conditions, however, subcomponents of an assembly which are constrained only at their interfaces – such as panels mounted to an underlying frame – prove difficult to treat using existing nonlinear modeling techniques. This work uses Craig-Bampton dynamic substructuring combined with characteristic constraint modes for interface reduction to examine the challenges associated with panel and frame assemblies, with a simple example motivating a discussion of current solutions and future challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
If the \(\boldsymbol{\Phi }^{\,j}\) is orthogonal through the mass matrix M j, then \(\mathbf{q}^{\,j} = (\boldsymbol{\Phi }^{\,j})^{T}\mathbf{M}^{\,j}\mathbf{Y}\). This is not the case when a Craig-Bampton transformation is used.
- 2.
References
Gordon, R.W., Hollkamp, J.J.: Reduced-order models for acoustic response prediction. Technical report. AFRL-RBWP-TR-2011-3040, Air Force Research Laboratory (2011)
Teunisse, N., Tiso, P., Demasi, L., Cavallaro, R.: Computational reduced order methods for structurally nonlinear joined wings. In: 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Jan 2015
Wang, J., Tzikang, C., Sleight, D.W., Tessler, A.: Simulating nonlinear deformations of solar sail membranes using explicit time integration. In: 45th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, Mar 2004
Tuegel, E.J., Ingraffea, A.R., Eason, T.G., Spottswood, M.S.: Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2011, 1–14 (2011)
Nash, M.: Nonlinear structural dynamics by finite element modal synthesis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College (1977)
Segalman, D.J., Dohrmann, C.R.: Method for calculating the dynamics of rotating flexible structures, Part 1: derivation. J. Vib. Acoust. Trans. ASME 118, 313–317 (1996)
Segalman, D.J., Dohrmann, C.R.: Method for calculating the dynamics of rotating flexible structures, Part 2: example calculations. J. Vib. Acoust. Trans. ASME 118, 318–322 (1996)
McEwan, M.I., Wright, J., Cooper, J.E., Leung, A.Y.T.: A combined modal/finite element analysis technique for the dynamic response of a non-linear beam to harmonic excitation. J. Sound Vib. 243, 601–624 (2001)
Muravyov, A.A., Rizzi, S.A.: Determination of nonlinear stiffness with application to random vibration of geometrically nonlinear structures. Comput. Struct. 81, 1513–1523 (2003)
Mignolet, M.P., Przekop, A., Rizzi, S.A., Spottswood, S.M.: A review of indirect/non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear geometric structures. J. Sound Vib. 332, 2437–2460 (2013)
Hollkamp, J.J., Gordon, R.W., Spottswood, S.M.: Nonlinear modal models for sonic fatigue response prediction: a comparison of methods. J. Sound Vib. 284, 1145–1163 (2005)
Bampton, M.C., Craig, R.R., Jr.: Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J. 6 (7), 1313–1319 (1968)
Kuether, R.J., Allen, M.S.: Substructuring with nonlinear reduced order models and interface reduction with characteristic constraint modes. In: 55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, National Harbor (2014)
Kuether, R.J.: Nonlinear modal substructuring of geometrically nonlinear finite element models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin – Madison (2014)
Kuether, R.J., Allen, M.S., Hollkamp, J.J.: Modal substructuring of geometrically nonlinear finite-element models. AIAA J. 54 (2), 691–702 (2015)
Castanier, M.P., Tan, Y.-C., Pierre, C.: Characteristic constraint modes for component mode synthesis. AIAA J. 39 (6), 1182–1187 (2001)
Hollkamp, J.J., Gordon, R.W.: Reduced-order models for nonlinear response prediction: implicit condensation and expansion. J. Sound Vib. 318, 1139–1153 (2008)
Allen, M.S., Kuether, R.J., Deaner, B., Sracic, M.W.: A numerical continuation method to compute nonlinear normal modes using modal reduction. In: 53rd AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu (2012)
Rosenberg, R.M.: Normal modes of nonlinear dual-mode systems. J. Appl. Mech. 27(2), 263–268 (1960)
Shaw, S., Pierre, C.: Normal modes for non-linear vibratory systems. J. Sound Vib. 164 (1), 85–124 (1993)
Kerschen, G., Peeters, M., Golinval, J., Vakakis, A.F.: Nonlinear normal modes, part I: a useful framework for the structural dynamicist. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23 (1), 170–194 (2009)
Peeters, M., Viguié, R., Sérandour, G., Kerschen, G., Golinval, J.-C.: Nonlinear normal modes, Part II: toward a practical computation using numerical continuation techniques. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23 (1), 195–216 (2009)
Abaqus Theory Manual. Abaqus version 2012. Dassault Systemes/Simulia, Johnston (2012)
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1256259. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Support was also provided by the Graduate School and the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at the University of Wisconsin – Madison with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
The authors also acknowledge Joseph Hollkamp from the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Structural Sciences Center, for the insights that he shared during the conduct of this and other work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Various details related to the linear models of the substructure components are given below. Retained fixed interface modes of the panel are given in Table 27.5.
Retained fixed interface modes of the hat stiffeners for soft and stiff assemblies are shown in Table 27.6.
A modal assurance criterion (MAC) check, along with corresponding frequency errors, between the substructured model and its full-order FEA counterpart is given in Fig. 27.8.
Nonlinear normal modes generated using various NLROMs of each assembly, along with the resultant periodicity errors from each model, are shown in Figs. 27.9 and 27.10 for the stiff and soft assemblies, respectively.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schoneman, J.D., Allen, M.S., Kuether, R.J. (2017). Nonlinear Modal Substructuring of Panel and Stiffener Assemblies via Characteristic Constraint Modes. In: Allen, M., Mayes, R., Rixen, D. (eds) Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54930-9_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54930-9_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54929-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54930-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)