Skip to main content

Homophily Evolution in Online Networks: Who Is a Good Friend and When?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts (AIST 2016)

Abstract

Homophily is considered by network scientists as one of the major mechanisms of social network formation. However, the role of dynamic homophily in the network growth process has not been investigated in detail yet. In this paper, we estimate the role of homophily by various attributes at different stages of online network formation process. We consider the process of online friendship formation in the Vkontakte social networking site among first-year students at a Russian university. We reveal that at the beginning of the network formation a similarity in gender and score in entrance exams plays the key role, while by the end of network establishment period the role of the same group affiliation becomes more important. We explain the results with the tendency of students to follow different strategies to control the information flow in their social environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://linis.hse.ru/en/soft-linis/.

References

  1. Block, P., Grund, T.: Multidimensional homophily in friendship networks. Netw. Sci. 2, 189–212 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lazarsfeld, P.F., et al.: Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom Control Mod. Soc. 18(1), 18–66 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lauw, H.W., Shafer, J.C., Agrawal, R., Ntoulas, A.: Homophily in the digital world: a livejournal case study. IEEE Internet Comput. 14, 15–23 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moody, J.: Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America1. Am. J. Sociol. 107, 679–716 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodreau, S.M., Kitts, J.A., Morris, M.: Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks*. Demography 46, 103–125 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., Christakis, N.: Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using facebook. com. Soc. Netw. 30, 330–342 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M., Kaufman, J.: Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 109, 68–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer, A., Puller, S.L.: The old boy (and girl) network: social network formation on university campuses. J. Public Econ. 92, 329–347 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaquero, L.M., Cebrian, M.: The rich club phenomenon in the classroom. Scientific reports 3 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Venables, W.N., Smith, D.M.: The R development core team. A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, An Introduction to R. Notes on R (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dokuka, S., Valeeva, D., Yudkevich, M.: Formation and evolution mechanisms in online network of students: the Vkontakte case. In: Khachay, M.Y., Konstantinova, N., Panchenko, A., Ignatov, D.I., Labunets, V.G. (eds.) AIST 2015. CCIS, vol. 542, pp. 263–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26123-2_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman, M.E.: Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208701 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, B.S., Butts, C., Carley, K.: The interaction of size and density with graph-level indices. Soc. Netw. 21, 239–267 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M.E.: Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 67, 026126 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 349–399 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Olessia Koltsova, Sergey Koltsov, and Vladimir Filippov for the opportunity to use Vkminer application. We would like to thank Benjamin Lind for the discussion and feedback on this work. The financial support of the 5–100 Government Program and Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Dokuka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dokuka, S., Valeeva, D., Yudkevich, M. (2017). Homophily Evolution in Online Networks: Who Is a Good Friend and When?. In: Ignatov, D., et al. Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts. AIST 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 661. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52920-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52920-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52919-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52920-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics