Abstract
The “animal turn” in academia has been described by researchers like Weil (J Fem Cult Stud 21(2):1–23, 2010) as an increasing scholarly interest in the status of animals beyond that of the utilitarian or agricultural scientific study of animals and the larger-than-human degraded ecological times we are living in. The human condition has always been defined and studied in relation to the animal, from ancient to contemporary posthuman thinkers, where the study of animal relations forms a large component of this ontological turn, with shifting aspirations to decenter anthropocentric interactions and challenge human assumptions of more-than-human lives. Human-animal studies, while still firmly planted within disciplinary margins, “have been edging towards the mainstream” (Ritvo, Environ Hist 9(2):204–220, 2004, p. 205), becoming increasingly popular, respected topics of inquiry (Ritvo, Daedalus 136(4):118–122, 2007). Creative opportunities for experimentation therefore exist where new terms, becomings, and conceptualizations are underway.
The chapters in this section provoke a diversity of such (re)thinking of child-animal relations within Western families, communities, and education where the complex relationships with children, animals, and environments provide a space for ethical considerations to the social positioning of animals in education and society. The chapters address ideas, conceptualizations, and possibilities of alternative ontologies with some authors venturing into pedagogical territory that attempts to reshape pedagogy and practice. Authors grapple with the taken-for-granted interspecies relationships in their messy, complex, and multiple forms, to look beyond to see the hidden, the marginalized, the unexplained, and the ill-considered. This questioning of multiple relatings has the potential to (re)imagine new models, theories, and ways of crossing boundaries that blur the illusion of separation between children, nature, and animals, where animals can be elevated as crucial components of living together in perilous times. As section editors who engage with human-animal research, ethics of concern, and activism in our work and everyday lives, we acknowledge the “contradictory foundations” of the animal question, and this is reflected in the diverse and sometimes opposing contributions of the chapters in this section. Readers will find a choice of theoretical, educational, and sociocultural representation and discussion in these writings, and this introduction offers signposts to guide the reader through the twists and turns. The authors enhance the explosive range of human-animal studies now underway in diverse disciplines, including arts, humanities, media studies, science, and social geographies, drawing attention to the question of the animal that is under-researched and underrepresented in education. The chapters in this section of the handbook offer alternatives to humanistic thought and actions, and our hope is that these contributions will legitimize the study of human-animal relations, prompting others to join us in research and practice that embraces ethical multispecies futures.
In the wake of poststructuralist and postmodern decenterings that have displaced the human as a standard for knowledge, theory finds itself in a similar predicament. It cannot avoid seeing the animal suffering around us, but has contradictory foundations on which to judge the good or the right thing to do about it. Responding to an urgent call for concern, those of us working on “the animal question” may only be able, like Red Peter, to make a report, but hopefully such reports will enable us to make decisions (for that is our human prerogative and responsibility) that will, to the best of our imperfect and partial knowledge, enhance the lives of all animals, ourselves included (Weil, 2010, p. 20).
References
Collins, L. (Producer), & Stanton, A. (Director). (2016). Finding dory [DVD]. Burbank, CA: Walt Disney Pictures & Pixar Animation Studios.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am (D. Wills, Trans.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
Favreau, J., & Taylor, B. (Producers), & Favreau, J. (Director). (2016). The jungle book. [DVD]. Walt Disney Pictures.
Gray, J. (2004, February, 9). A report to the academy, New Statesman. Retrieved from http://www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-m/gray01.htm
Hamilton, L., & Taylor, N. (2017). Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kafka, F. (1917). Letter to the academy. In M. Brod (Ed.), The diaries of Franz Kafka (pp. 1914–1923). New York, NY: Schocken Books.
Kahn, R., & Humes, B. (2009). Marching out from Ultima Thule: Critical counterstories of emancipatory educators working at the intersection of human rights, animal rights, and planetary sustainability. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 179–195.
Meledandri, C., & Healy, J. (Producers), & Renaud, C. (Director). (2016). The secret life of pets [DVD]. Universal City, CA: Illumination Entertainment.
Melson, G. (2001). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
Myers, G. (2007). The significance of children and animals: Social development and our connections to other species (2nd ed.). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.
Oakley, J., Watson, G., Russell, C., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Fawcett, L., Kuhl, G., … Warkentin, T. (2010). Animal encounters in environmental education research: Responding to the “Question of the animal”. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 11–27.
Ritvo, H. (2004). Animal planet. Environmental Histories, 9(2), 204–220.
Ritvo, H. (2007). On the animal turn. Daedalus, 136(4), 118–122.
Rowe, B. (2012). Consuming animals as an education act. (PhD). Ohio State University.
Spencer, C. (Producer), & Howard, B., & Moore, R. (Directors). (2016). Zootropolis [DVD]. Walt Disney Animation Studios.
Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. (A. Goffrey, Trans.). Open Universities Press in collaboration with Meson Press, Hybrid Publishing Lab, Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Tipper, B. (2011). ‘A dog who I know quite well’: Everyday relationships between children and animals. Children’s Geographies, 9(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.562378
Weil, K. (2010). A report on the animal turn. Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 21(2), 1–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Young, T., Rautio, P. (2018). Childhoodnature Animal Relations: Section Overview. In: Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_62-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_62-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education