Skip to main content

Greedy Bags of Childhoodnature Theories

Book cover Research Handbook on Childhoodnature

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to assemble a theoretical toolkit, a greedy bag of possibilities, that can enable childhood-nature encounters to flourish in the Anthropocene and beyond. In this undertaking, our aim is not to put diverse theoretical perspectives into competition with each other but rather to assemble theories as tools which can produce sparks when knocked together. These are theories that can be packed up and taken for a walk. Theories that can help us to get out of sticky situations. And theories which children themselves can use to address the crises which they will inevitably inherit (and already are). As such, this theory-infused section seeks to put multiple philosophical perspectives into consequential relations such that they can become productive in their directions and differences. In this chapter we take stock of theories that have been productive in the field childhood-nature up to this point, while at the same time seeking new theories, which are emerging in direct response to the contemporary planetary turn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barad, K. (2012, June). Intra-actions: An interview with Karen Barad by Adam Kleinman. Mousse, #34, 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2013). The world of attachment? The post-humanist challenge to freedom and necessity. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 516–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. (Ed.). (2010). Extinction: Framing the end of the species. London, UK: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987/2014). A thousand plateaus. (Translated and a foreword by B. Massumi). London, England: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2005). On touching–Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhn, I., Malone, K., & Tesar, M. (2017). Troubling the Intersections of urban/nature/childhood in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1357–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2011). SF: Science fiction, speculative fabulation, string figures, so far. Viewed Jan 30 2014. http://people.ucsc.edu/~haraway/Files/PilgrimAcceptanceHaraway.pdf.

  • Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165. http://environmentalhumanities.org.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC/London, England: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Open Court: Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2011). The quadruple object. Winchester, UK/Washington, DC: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2013). Bells and whistles: More speculative realism. Winchester, UK/Washington, DC: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, L. (2016). Hope and grief in the anthropocene: Re-conceptualising human–nature relations. London, UK: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodologies. London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2017). Children in the Anthropocene: Rethinking sustainability and child friendliness in cities. London, England: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K., & Waite, S. (2016). Student outcomes and natural schooling: Pathways from evidence to impact report. Plymouth, UK: Plymouth University. Retrieved from https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/6/6811/Student_outcomes_and__natural_schooling_pathways_to_impact_2016.pdf. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3327.7681.

  • Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2010). The ecological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2016). Dark Ecology. For a logic of future coexistence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, J. (2017). From human–Nature to cultureplace in education via an exploration of unity and relation in the work of Peirce and Dewey. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., Blaise, M., & Guigni, M. (2013). Haraway’s ‘bag lady story-telling’: Relocating childhood and learning within a ‘post-human landscape’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Tuin, I. (2014). Diffraction as methodology as feminist onto-epistemology: On encountering chantal and chawaf and posthuman interpellation. Parallax, 20(3), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, S. (2013). Knowing your place in the world: How place and culture support and obstruct educational aims. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, S. (2015). Culture clash and concord: Supporting early learning outdoors in the UK. In H. Prince, K. Henderson, & B. Humberstone (Eds.), International handbook of outdoor studies. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Malone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Malone, K., Duhn, I., Tesar, M. (2018). Greedy Bags of Childhoodnature Theories. In: Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_3-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_3-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51949-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Greedy Bags of Childhoodnature Theories
    Published:
    04 January 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_3-2

  2. Original

    Greedy Bags of Childhoodnature Theories
    Published:
    05 April 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_3-1