Skip to main content

Adaptation in Archaeology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 275 Accesses

Introduction

The theory of evolution is inherently attractive for archaeologists, who are concerned with the long-term history of humankind (Dunnell 1980). Changes through time during the long process of hominization are, by definition, adaptive. Adaptation is clearly one basic constituent of evolution. For that reason, the concept of adaptation – including the capacity for a cultural system to adjust to changes – is important in many approaches, particularly in ecologically oriented archaeology and, more recently, in evolutionary archaeology.

Definition

This variety of approaches using the concept of adaptation naturally leads to the existence of slightly different definitions (O’Brien and Holland 1992; Van Pool 2002).

Basically, adaptation refers to “the idea that organisms are fitted for the particular environments in which they live” (Alexander 1962: 826) or more directly to the “conformity between the organism and its environment” (Pianka 1983: 85).

It is accepted that an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, G. 1962. General biology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, D.W., and J.F. O’Connell. 2006. Behavioral ecology and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 14: 143–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J., and E.A. Smith. 1998. Is it evolution yet? A critique of evolutionary archaeology. Current Anthropology 39: 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R.C. 1980. Evolutionary theory and archaeology. In Advances in archaeological method and theory, ed. M. Schiffer, vol. 3, 35–99. New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R.L. 1995. The foraging spectrum. Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P.V. 1980. The archaeological study of adaptation: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Advances in archaeological method and theory, ed. M. Schiffer, vol. 3, 101–156. New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, P.V. 2010. Peopling of the Pacific: A holistic anthropological perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R.D., and G.T. Jones. 1987. Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, H. 1992. Ceramics and evolution. In Archaeological method and theory, ed. M. Schiffer, vol. 4, 141–193. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J. 1987. Sedentism, population growth, and resource selection in the Woodland midwest: A review of coevolutionary developments. Current Anthropology 28: 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., and T.D. Holland. 1992. The role of adaptation in archaeological explanation. American Antiquity 57: 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M.J., R.L. Lyman, and R.D. Leonard. 1998. Basic incompatibilities between evolutionary and behavioral archaeology. American Antiquity 63: 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R. 1983. Evolutionary ecology. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss, A.M., J.C. Chatters, and I. Kuijt. 2009. Macroevolution in human prehistory. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinsohn, V. 2011. Adeptos a la adaptación: tres propuestas clásicas para la arqueología y una evaluación. Antipoda. Revista de Antropología Arqueológica 13: 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B. 1996. Some relationships between behavioral and evolutionary archaeologies. American Antiquity 61: 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, J. 1955. Theory of culture change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pool, T.L. 2002. Adaptation. In Darwin and archaeology, ed. J.P. Hart and J.E. Terrell, 15–28. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E., and N. Eldredge. 1984. Individuals, hierarchies, and processes: Towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 10: 146–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. 1949. The science of culture: A study of man and civilization. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Alberto Borrero .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Borrero, L.A. (2018). Adaptation in Archaeology. In: Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_251-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_251-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics