Abstract
Certainly apprehensive with how things go in academia concerning engineering project education we observed and analysed different learning settings, either in engineering schools and companies, by discussing with different actors (academic community, teachers, pedagogical and scientific board elements, students). We exercised some alternative approaches to distinct learning paradigms, and we concluded for simple general recommendations that can be placed in practice in academia and companies, in engineering project contexts. The goal of our research is to make explicit a specific paradigm, an integrated way of looking into engineering practice and engineering learning, mainly in engineering projects context. Internalizing lessons from this alternative paradigm we deploy a way of doing in class that can be explored as active learning and project-based learning. The main advantage of our proposed approach is that learning occurs by doing and, we would say more importantly, learning occurs almost as a sub-product of doing. And in fact there are mix goals in our approach. One is performing, and obtaining results in engineering project design and development, the second one is a by-product and it is learning, enriching its own dynamic capabilities, and internalizing tacit and explicit knowledge about the work experienced. Of course the effectiveness of this model resides in the alignment of the two goals, which implies mature stuff and mature students almost about taking their master degree.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Argyris, C., Schon, D.: Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading (1978)
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R.: The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Cogn. Sci. 9(4), 159–162 (2005)
Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S., McCanse, A.A.: Change by Design. Addison- Wesley, Mass (1989)
Borgford-Parnell, J., Deibel, K., Atman, C.J.: From engineering design research to engineering pedagogy: bringing research results directly to the students. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 26(4), 748–759 (2010)
Bransford, J.: Guest editorial: preparing people for rapidly changing environments. J. Eng. Educ. 1–3 (2007). Guest Editorial
Bucciarelli, L.L.: Designing engineers, inside technology. In: Bijker, W.E., Carlson, W.B., Pinch, T.J. (eds.) MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Burger, R.: 14 Surprising Project Management Statistics, Published November 2nd, Project Management (2015)
Callon, M.: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. J. Law, Power, Action Belief: New Sociol. Knowl? 32, 196–223 (1986). London, Routledge
Damasio, A.: Descartes Error. Penguin Books, New York (2005)
Grinter, L.E.: Report of the committee on evaluation of engineering education (Grinter Report). J. Eng. Educ. 44(3), 25–60 (1955)
KPMG, Project Management Survey Report 2013, Strategies to capture business value (2013)
Mumford, E.: A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requirements Eng. 5(2), 125–133 (2002)
Ryan, N.R.: Project retrospectives: evaluating project success, failure, and everything in between. MIS Q. Executive 4(3), 361–372 (2005)
Nonaka, I.: The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus. Rev. 69(6), 96–104 (1991)
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company, How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)
Prabhakar, G.P.: What is project success: a literature review. Int. J. Bus. Manage. 3(8), 3–10 (2008)
Pfaff, T.J.: Review of street-fighting mathematics: the art of educated guessing and opportunistic problem solving by Sanjoy Mahajan. Numeracy 8(2), 0–5 (2015)
PMI’s Pulse of the Profession, 2015, Capturing the Value of PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PMI, February 2015
Riemer, M.J.: English and communication skills for the global engineer. Glob. J. Eng. Educ. 6(1), 91–100 (2002)
Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)
Edgar, S.M., Alexei Serna, A.: Knowledge in engineering: a view from the logical reasoning. Int. J. Comput. Theor. Eng. 7(4), 325–331 (2015)
Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report
Vincenti, W.G.: What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1990)
Code, K.: The Soft Science of Road Racing Motorcycles, California Superbike School, Hollywood, California (1986)
Code, K.: A Twist of The Wrist, California Superbike School, Hollywood, California (1983)
NSP, National Society for Professional Engineers, Engineering Body of Knowledge (2013)
Acknowledgment
The author thanks the students in the spring 2016 semester in the Project unit of the Engineering and Management of Energy Master at IST, Universidade de Lisboa. The case briefly summarized in Sect. 4 was the responsibility of EDPI and EDPR. It was mainly Eng. Tiago Duarte of EDPI who assumed the company view and played the role of educated client. Eng. Tiago Duarte was instrumental in the success of the experience. He played the role of a very educated client with which groups should negotiate and deal. Eng. Tiago Duarte was quite familiar with technology, company strategy, and economic restrictions and like that he could play very well the role of captain of the gates. Finally, my thanks to the Director of the InnoEnergy masters’ program Renewable Energy – RENE, to the InnoEnergy Iberia Education Officer, and to RENE Industry Liaison Officer. InnoEnergy is supported by the EIT, a body of the European Union.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Figueiredo, J. (2017). Learning Engineering Through Teams. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Uhomoibhi, J. (eds) Interactive Collaborative Learning. ICL 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 544. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50337-0_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50337-0_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50336-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50337-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)