Skip to main content

Introduction: Ways of Seeing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

  • 555 Accesses

Abstract

The introduction emphasizes the importance of the concept of invisibility for the cultural significance of syphilis at the fin de siècle and for its subsequent study. It charts the major critical tendencies and registers some of the blind spots characteristic of the research on syphilis. The book’s perspective highlights the plurality of views surrounding syphilis in the late nineteenth century and allows for the specific media and discourses around the disease to bear on one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The website of the National Gallery in London references this plurality of readings: “The howling figure on the left has been variously interpreted as Jealousy, Despair and the effects of syphilis” (“An Allegory with Venus and Cupid”).

  2. 2.

    Critical literature on the role of syphilis in the European context is not free of such shortcomings. Tomasz Śpiewak (2006), for instance, describes an instance of critical blindness to syphilis with reference to one of the most acclaimed representatives of the fin de siècle “Young Poland” movement. A reverse tendency of a careless identification of syphilis in works in which other diseases are clearly referenced has been pointed out by Mieke Bal in relation to two interpretations of Zola’s Nana (1996: 208).

  3. 3.

    In September 2010, the US Department of Health and Human Services made public the “Findings from a CDC Report on the 1946–1948 US Public Health Service Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Inoculation Study,” revealing the extent of the US/Guatemala experiments. On the Guatemala, Oslo and Tuskegee experiments, see McNeil 2010, J. Jones 1981, Reverby 2000, 2009 and Uschan 2006.

  4. 4.

    On the outbreak of syphilis in the early twenty-first century, see for instance Hourihan et al. 2004, Ashton et al. 2003, Simms et al. 2005. A warning about the spread of syphilis was communicated by Patrick French in the BBC radio programme “The Return of Syphilis” (25 January 2008), in which he indicated the alarming increase of births of children with congenital syphilis despite syphilis screenings for pregnant women. In July 2001, NAM, an organization aiming to raise awareness about AIDS and HIV, published a special issue of its monthly journal on the UK syphilis outbreak (“Aids Treatment Update” 2001). Even British tabloids reported the spread of the disease (“Syphilis in Unwelcome Return” 2007).

  5. 5.

    Popular culture often limits syphilis to a humorous trope: for example, in MAD TV’s parody of Nelly Furtado’s “Promiscuous Girl,” “Syphilis Girl,” as well as in the American (medical, crime) series (Grey’s Anatomy, House M.D., Bones). Sporadic film representations which regard the disease with more seriousness are Miss Evers’ Boys (Dir. Sargent 1997) and The Libertine (Dir. Dunmore 2004).

  6. 6.

    Sander Gilman (1987), Susan Sontag (1989: 24–6) and Anja Schonlau (2005: 2) regard AIDS as a cultural successor of syphilis. It should not be forgotten, however, that contemporary criticism produces the link between syphilis and AIDS as much as it describes this connection. In his analysis of the intersection of discourses on contagion, moral panic and homosexuality in various reports on AIDS, for instance, Simon Watney claims that AIDS patients are “usually hospitalized and physically debilitated, ‘withered, wrinkled, and loathsome of visage’ – the authentic cadaver of Dorian Gray” (1993: 206), thus clothing contemporary fears in the iconographic legacy of the Victorian era.

  7. 7.

    On these developments, see Hardy 2001 and Bynum 2006.

  8. 8.

    For an overview of these developments, see Crissey and Parish 1981: 219, 352–5, Oriel 1994: 49, Quétel 1990: 162–4.

  9. 9.

    Chapter 3 discusses the question of professionalization in the context of syphilis debates. For the discussions of “quackery” in terms of medical “fringe,” see Bynum and Porter 1987.

  10. 10.

    On the influence of continental literature in Britain, see Schonlau (2005) and Goens (1995). By far the most detailed and analytically compelling study of French literature and its treatment of the disease is offered by Lasowski (1982).

  11. 11.

    Allan M. Brandt’s remarkable study No Magic Bullet (1985) offers a similar survey in the American context.

  12. 12.

    A number of dissertations in the history of medicine have lent specific attention to issues that have either been overlooked or oversimplified. As they remain unpublished and not easily accessible, they have generated little impact on contemporary discussions. Of particular interest here are Townsend 1999, K. Taylor 1997 and McMahon 2000.

  13. 13.

    Other sub-interests within the thematic study of degeneration have been the symbolic function of syphilis in Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890), Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897), R. L. Stevenson’s “The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde” (1886), and H. G. Wells’s “The Time Machine” (1895). Wilde scholars have frequently addressed the health of the author himself (Atkinson 2004, Nater 1993, Holland 1988). Some studies on Arthur Conan Doyle and his literary treatment of the disease have been primarily interested in the accuracy of syphilis’ depiction (Somasundaram 2009, Silverstein and Ruggere 2006).

  14. 14.

    While concerned with French literature, Patrick Wald Lasowski’s 1982 study is worth mentioning due to its analytical sensitivity and its detailed survey of the role the disease played in the French literature of the fin de siècle. Lasowski’s major contribution to the study of syphilis lies in the links he draws between the illness and French textual modernity (1982: 164–5).

  15. 15.

    In her discussion of visual culture, Mieke Bal proposes to leave open the question of disciplinarity (2003: 6) and instead refer to this area of study as a “movement” (2003: 6). Rather than “transdisciplinary” or “multidisciplinary,” she regards it, after Barthes, to be “interdisciplinary” in the sense that it creates its own object of study (2003: 7). For further discussions concerning the definition, scope and the relationship between visual culture and other disciplines, such as cultural and media studies, art history, feminism or aesthetics, see Morra and Smith 2006 vol. I, A. Jones 2006: 34–6, Evans and Hall 2006: 43–5, W. J. Mitchell 2002: 87.

  16. 16.

    Visual culture scholars stress this programmatic element with particular vehemence. Morra and Smith affirm the propensity of visual culture to question the status quo of disciplines, including its own (2006: 14–15).

  17. 17.

    Both Bal and Verhoeff attribute “seriating” to Bhabha (1994: 22), to my knowledge, however, The Location of Culture, referenced here, does not contain this quotation.

  18. 18.

    In this context, Bal is talking about “glancing” as opposed to “gazing,” where the former is regarded as “the involved look where views are aware of and bodily participating in the process of looking” (1996: 264).

Bibliography

  • Brooke, Emma Frances. A Superfluous Woman. London: W. Heinemann, 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkley, Duncan L. Syphilis in the Innocent (Syphilis Insonitum). Clinically and Historically Considered with a Plan for the Legal Control of the Disease. New York: Bailey & Fairchild, 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Sifilis. 1900. Litograph. Museu National D’Art de Catelunya. Web. 15 June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Alfred. Syphilis. 2nd edn. London: J.&A. Churchill, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudet, Alphonse. In the Land of Pain. 1930. Trans. Julian Barnes. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. La syphilis héréditaire tardive. Paris: Masson, 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. L’hérédité syphilitique. Paris: Masson, 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, George Henry. Photographic Illustrations of Cutaneous Syphilis. New York: E. B. Treat, 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Illustrations of Clinical Surgery Consisting of Plates, Photographs, Woodcuts, Diagrams, etc. Illustrating Surgical Diseases, Symptoms and Accidents, also Operative and other Methods of Treatment, with Descriptive Letterpress. Vols. 2. London: J. & A. Churchill, 1878–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Syphilis. London: Cassell & Company, 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Descriptive Catalogue of the Clinical Museum and Journal of Proceedings. London: Churchill, 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibsen, H. “Ghosts.” Four Major Plays. 1881. Trans. James McFerlane, and Jens Arup. Oxford: OUP, 1998. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. “Love-o’-Women.” Many Inventions. 1893. New York: Doubleday, Page, 1912. 289–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Albertine at the Police Doctor’s Waiting Room. 1887. Nasjonalmuseet. Web. 15 July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambkin, Francis Joseph. The Treatment of Syphilis. London: Tindall and Cox, 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Malcolm. “The Progress of Medicine during the Queen’s Reign.” Nineteenth Century: A Monthly Review 41.243 (1897): 739. 19th Century UK Periodicals. Web. 17 December 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Henry Holdich. Genito-Urinary Diseases and Syphilis. Philadelphia: Davis, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Inheritance. 1903–05. Oil on canvas. The Munch Museum, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumler, Dr. The Venereal Diseases Arising from Contagion and the Principles of their Treatment Popularly Described. 15th edn. Geneva: Published by the Author, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorolla, Joaquín y Bastida. Sad Inheritance. 1899. Oil on canvas. Bancaja Collection, Alicante.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Robert Lewis. The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. 1886. Ed. Roger Luckhurst. Oxford: OUP, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, Bram. 1897. Dracula. London: Penguin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulouse-Lautrec, Henry de. Medical Examination, Rue des Moulins. 1894. Oil on cardbord. The National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, H. G. 1895. The Time Machine. New York: Dover, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray: An Annotated, Uncensored Edition. 1890. Ed. Nicholas Frankel. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap P of Harvard UP, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Syphilis in Unwelcome Return.” The Sun 21 Dec. 2007. Web. 11 March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. et al. “An Outbreak no Longer: Factors Contributing to the Return of Syphilis in Greater Manchester.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 79.4 (2003): 291–3. PubMed. Web. 20 January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Tully. “The Wilde Syphilis Question.” Wildean: A Journal of Oscar Wilde Studies 25 (2004): 71–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, Mieke. Double Exposures: The Subject of Cultural Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Introduction. The Practice of Cultural Analysis. Exposing Interdisciplinary Interpretation. Ed. Bal. Stanford: Oxford UP, 1999. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture.” Journal of Visual Culture 2.1 (2003): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Kevin. The Pox: The Life and Near Death of a Very Social Disease. Phoenix Mill: Sutton, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, W. F. “The Rise of Science in Medicine, 1850–1913.” The Western Medical Tradition 1800 to 2000. Ed. W. F. Bynum, Anne Hardy et al. Cambridge: CUP, 2006. 111–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, and Roy Porter, eds. Medical Fringe and Medical Orthodoxy, 1750–1850. London: Croom Helm, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Thomas, Nathan Carlin, and Ronald A. Carson, eds. Medical Humanities: An Introduction. New York, NY: CUP, 2015a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Introducing Medical Humanities. Medical Humanities: An Introduction. Ed. Cole, Carlin, and Carson. New York, NY: CUP, 2015b. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comolli, Jean-Louis. “Machines of the Visible.” The Cinematic Apparatus. Ed. Teresa De Lauretis and Stephen Health. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1980. 121–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. F. “Syphilis and Bronzino’s London Allegory.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 49 (1986): 250–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crissey, John Thorne, and Lawrence Charles Parish. The Dermatology and Syphilology of the Nineteenth Century. New York: Praeger, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gayle. The Cruel Madness of Love”: Sex, Syphilis and Psychiatry in Scotland, 1880–1930. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikovitskaya, Margarita. Visual Culture: The Study of the Visual after the Cultural Turn. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, William. “The Metaphor of Syphilis in Grand’s Heavenly Twins.” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies 5.1 (2009). Web. 24 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, Colin. “Who is Durer’s ‘Syphilitic Man’?” Perspectives in Biology & Medicine 52.1 (2009): 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Jessica, and Stuart Hall. “What is Visual Culture?” Visual Culture. Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies. Vol. 1. Ed. Joanne Morra and Marquard Smith. London: Routledge, 2006. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. 1935. Ed. Thaddeus J. Trenn, and Robert K. Merton. Trans. Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, Kate. The Victorians and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge: CUP, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Pamela. Disease, Desire, and the Body in Victorian Women’s Popular Novels. Cambridge: CUP, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, Sander L. “Black Bodies, White Bodies: Toward an Iconography of Female Sexuality in Late Nineteenth-Century Art, Medicine, and Literature.” Critical Inquiry 12.1 (1985): 204–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Difference and Pathology: Stereotypes of Sexuality, Race, and Madness. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, Sander. “AIDS and Syphilis: The Iconography of Disease.” AIDS: Cultural Analysis/Cultural Activism. Spec. issue of October 43.(1987): 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Sexuality: An Illustrated History. Representing the Sexual in Medicine and Culture from the Middle Ages to the Age of AIDS. New York: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Touch, Sexuality and Disease.” Medicine and the Five Senses. Eds. W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter. Cambridge: CUP, 1993a. 198–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Picturing Health and Illness: Images of Identity and Difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goens, Jean. De la syphilis au sida: cinq siècles des mémoires littéraires de Vénus. Brussels: Presses universitaires européennes, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, Anne. Health and Medicine in Britain since 1860. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, Margaret. “Bronzino’s London ‘Allegory’ and the Art of Syphilis.” Oxford Art Journal 20.1 (1997): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. New Woman Strategies: Sarah Grand, Olive Schreiner, Mona Caird. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Merlin. “What Killed Oscar Wilde?” Spectator 24.(1988): 34–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourihan, M., H. Wheeler, R. Houghton, and B. Goh. “Lessons from the Syphilis Outbreak in Homosexual Men in East London.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 80.6 (2004): 509–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Geographies of Regulation. Policing Prostitution in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the Empire. Cambridge: CUP, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, Sheila. The Spinster and Her Enemies: Feminism and Sexuality, 1880–1930. North Melbourne: Spinifex, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, James H. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Amelia. “Introduction: Conceiving the Intersection of Feminism and Visual Culture.” Visual Culture. Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies. Vol. 1. Eds. Joanne Morra and Marquard Smith. London: Routledge, 2006. 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M. “Syphilis, Sex and Psychiatry, 1789–1925: Part 2.” Australasian Psychiatry 18.1 (2010): 22–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Meegan. “Syphilis and the Hysterical Female: the Limits of Realism in Sarah Grand’s The Heavenly Twins. ” Women’s Writing 11.2 (2004): 259–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasowski, Patrick Wald. Syphilis. Essai sur la literature française du XIXe siècle. Paris: Gallimard, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledger, Sally. The New Woman: Fiction and Feminism at the Fin de Siècle. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Philippa. “Venereal Disease, Prostitution, and the Politics of the Empire: The Case of British India.” Journal of History of Sexuality 4.4 (1994): 579–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Prostitution, Race and Politics. Policing Venereal Disease in the British Empire. New York: Routledge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liggins, Emma. “Writing against the ‘Husband-Fiend’: Syphilis and Male Sexual Vice in the New Woman Novel.” Women’s Writing 7.2 (2000): 175–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, N. F. “Hogarth, Beauty Spots, and Sexually Transmitted Diseases.” British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 15. 1 (1992): 71–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangum, Teresa. Married, Middlebrow, and Militant. Sarah Grand and the New Woman Novel. 1998. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Sarah. “The Congenital Syphilis Debates 1870–1900.” BSc Diss., Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, Donald, Jr. “U.S. Apologizes for Syphilis Tests in Guatemala.” New York Times 1 October 2010. Web. 14 February. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoeff, Nicholas. “Ghostwriting: Working Out Visual Culture.” Journal of Visual Culture 1.2 (2002): 239–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. “Showing Seeing. A Critique of Visual Culture.” The Visual Culture Reader. 2nd edn. Ed. Nicholas Mirzoeff. London: Routledge, 2002. 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morra, Joanne, and Marquard Smith. Introduction. Visual Culture. Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies. Vol. 1. Morra and Smith. London: Routledge, 2006. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, R. S. “Syphilis in Art: An Entertainment in Four Parts. Part 2.” Genitourinary Medicine 66 (1990a): 112–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Syphilis in Art: An Entertainment in Four Parts. Part 4.” Genitourinary Medicine 66 (1990b): 280–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nater, J. P. “The Question of Wilde’s Possible Syphilis.” Wild About Wilde Newsletter 15 (1993): 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Scars of Venus. A History of Venerology. London: Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Katherine. “Contagion, Public Health, and The Visual Culture of Nineteenth-Century Skin.” Imagining Illness: Public Health and Visual Culture. Ed. David Serlin. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2010. 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quétel, Claude. History of Syphilis. Trans. Judith Braddock and Brian Pike. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverby, Susan. Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and Its Legacy. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Tuskegee Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Chapel Hill, NC: U of North Carolina P, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Angelique. Love and Eugenics in the Late Nineteenth Century: Rational Reproduction and the New Woman. Oxford: OUP, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Irit. “Studying Visual Culture.” The Visual Culture Reader. 2nd edn. Ed. Nicholas Mirzoeff. London: Routledge, 2002. 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Charles E. Introduction. Framing Disease: Illness, Society, and History. Framing Disease. Rosenberg and Golden. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1992a. xiii–xxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonlau, Anja. Syphilis in der Literatur: Über Ästhetik, Moral, Genie und Medizin (1880–2000). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohat, Ella, and Robert Stam. “Narrativizing Visual Culture: Towards a Polycentric Aesthetics.” The Visual Culture Reader. 2nd edn. Ed. Nicholas Mirzoeff. London: Routledge, 2002. 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showalter, Elaine. “Syphilis, Sexuality, and the Fiction of the Fin de Siècle.” Sex, Politics, and Science in the Nineteenth-Century Novel. Essays from the English Institute. Ed. Ruth Yeazel and Neil Hertz. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1986. 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Sexual Anarchy: Gender and Culture at the Fin de Siècle. London: Bloomsbury, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, Arthur, and Christine Ruggere. “Dr. Arthur Conan Doyle and the Case of Congenital Syphilis.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 49.2 (2006): 209–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, I., et al. “The Re-emergence of Syphilis in the UK: The New Epidemic Phases.” Sex Transm Dis 32.4 (2005): 220–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Andrew. Victorian Demons: Medicine, Masculinity and the Gothic at the Fin-de-Siecle. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somasundram, O. “Neuro Syphilis: Portrayals by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.” Indian Journal of Psychiatry 51.3 (2009): 235–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. AIDS and its Metaphors. Toronto: Collins, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śpiewak, Tomasz. “Stanisław Wyspiański (1869–1907): The Last Self-Portrait of the ‘Syphilitic Artist.’” Bordering Biomedicine. Ed. Vera Kalitzkus and Peter Twohig. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spongberg, Mary. Feminizing Venereal Disease: The Body of the Prostitute in Nineteenth- Century Medical Discourse. New York: New York UP, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Jeremy. The Architect and the Pavilion Hospital: Dialogue and Design Creativity in England, 1850–1914. London and New York: Leicester UP, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Joanne. “Private Diseases in Public Discourse: Venereal Disease in Victorian Society, Culture and Imagination.” PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uschan, Michael V. The Tuskegee Experiments: Forty Years of Medical Racism. Detroit: Lucent Books, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff, Nanna. The West in Early Cinema. After the Beginning. Amsterdam: Amsterdam UP, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowitz, Judith. Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State. Cambridge: CUP, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. City of Dreadful Delight. Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Adrian. “On the History of Disease Concepts: The Case of Pleurisy.” History of Science 38.3 (2000): 271–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson Carpenter, Mary. Health, Medicine, and Society in Victorian England. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watney, Simon. “The Spectacle of AIDS.” The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. Eds. Henry Abelove, Michèle Aina Barale and David M. Halperin. London: Routledge, 1993. 202–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Aids Treatment Update.” NAM AIDSMAP (2001) Web. 13 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardis, Ann L. New Women, New Novels. Feminism and Early Modernism. New Brunswick: Rutgers, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Allan. No Magic Bullet. Oxford: OUP, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pietrzak-Franger, M. (2017). Introduction: Ways of Seeing. In: Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49535-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics