Skip to main content

Reductionism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior
  • 58 Accesses

Synonyms

Mind-body problem; Mind-brain problem

Introduction

To set the stage for writing about reductionism, it may help first to review briefly the history of philosophy associated with, as it was known historically, the mind-body problem. However, mind-brain will be used here instead of mind-body. The four basic views are diagrammatically summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagrammatic representation of the mind-brain relationship problem

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailey, A. M., & Thomas, R. K. (1998). An investigation of oddity concept learning by rats. The Psychological Record, 48, 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, M. J. (2012). Did you ever hear the one about the horse that could count? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, H. (2007). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers (Original work published in 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2005). Reductionism, mental. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford guide to philosophy (p. 794). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, I. D. (1945). Psychology and Heisenberg’s principle of indeterminacy. Psychological Review, 53, 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfungst, O. (1965). Clever Hans (The horse of Mr. von Osten). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. (Original work published in 1911).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1963). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: The experimenter’s hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. American Scientist, 51, 268–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (2005). Reductionism. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford guide to philosophy (pp. 793–794). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, H. N. (1943). Determinism and responsibility. Science, 97, 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. K. (1988). Are radical and cognitivism incompatible? In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (pp. 367–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. K. (1993). Squirrel monkeys, concepts and logic. In R. G. Burton (Ed.), Natural and artificial minds (pp. 101–119). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. K., & Noble, L. M. (1988). Visual and olfactory oddity learning in rats: What evidence is necessary to show conceptual behavior? Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. B. (1967). Philosophy and the science of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger K. Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Thomas, R.K. (2019). Reductionism. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_757-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_757-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics