Abstract
After examining and comparing the concepts of equality, justice, and fairness and their evolution in both the East and the West, I adopt a unique three-level perspective of philosophy, systems, and behaviors to develop a theoretical framework and practical direction for fair development in China. Confucian philosophy has had a dominant influence on the formation of the Chinese fairness ideology and related social practices. The social ideal that “the world community is equally shared by all,” the disparity structure maintained by the ritual system, and the conscious behavioral development of the elite class of scholars and officials are the primary driving forces of the continuous evolution of fairness in Chinese society. Traditionally, fairness in China was institutionalized through the “benevolence” and “rites” of Confucianism. Looking forward to the future, China needs to influence the theories and practices of fair development by: (a) embedding the concept of equality in the ideology of fair development, (b) enabling the development of fairness through institutional construction, and (c) promoting the construction of social norms as a civil movement to advance fair development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chen, B., & Liu, Z. (2010). Historical review of fairness concept under Western philosophy framework: Discussion on the conceptual development of Chinese social fairness. Journal of Shandong University of Technology, 5, 42–45.
Ding, M. (2013). The bubble theory: Towards a framework of enlightened needs and fair development (S. Gu, Trans.). Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
Gu, Z. (1982). Greek city state system. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Li, D. (2004). The analysis of fairness concept in pre-Qin era. Philosophical Investigations, 10, 37–43.
Liao, S. (2002). On the variations and syntheses in the development of the dominant concept of justice of the West (Part I). Studies in Ethics, 2, 55–60.
Liao, S. (2003). On the variations and syntheses in the development of the dominant concept of justice of the West (Part II). Studies in Ethics, 1, 69–74.
Qian, M. (2012). History of Chinese thoughts (simplified Chinese edition). Beijing: Jiuzhou Press.
Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice (H. He, B. He, & S. Liao, Trans.). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Shao, B. (2012). Confucian fairness and its modern transformation: A comparative perspective. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition), 41(10), 29–36.
Wan, B., & Chen, Y. (2000). Historical development and contemporary significance of fairness concept. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 7, 87–94.
Wu, Q. (2007). Shift from egalitarianism to fairness: Changes in Chinese fairness values. Morality and Civilization, 4, 26–30.
Yuan, G. (1992). Marxist fairness concept. Seeker, 4, 33–38.
Zhai, X. (2010). The Chinese conception of grant fairness and its mode of social operation. Open Times, 5, 84–102.
Zhong, M., & Qi, G. (2008). Historical evolvement of fairness thoughts. Journal of Central China Normal University (Social Science Edition), 47(5), 33–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jiang, Q. (2017). Fair Development: Theoretical Evolution and Practical Orientation in China. In: Jiang, Q., Qian, L., Ding, M. (eds) Fair Development in China. Perspectives on Sustainable Growth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43663-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43663-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43661-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43663-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)