Abstract
Despite the widespread use of Dynamic Geometry Environments (DGEs) in mathematics classrooms, they feature very little in most teachers’ assessment practices. Indeed, many researchers have acknowledged the lack of research on how DGEs can and should be used in the context of assessment, and on how the learning that is developed through the use of DGEs in mathematics can be evaluated. Digital technologies include a range of mathematical and technological competencies that are not assessed in a paper-and-pencil environment. Moreover, the feedback provided by DGEs involves a whole new dynamic of action/interaction during assessment. This paper draws on previous work on task design in DGEs to provide a framework for identifying and designing different types of assessment tasks according to the specific goals of the teacher. These types of tasks will be exemplified using tasks designed by the first author for the iPad-based, multi-touch Sketchpad Explorer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainley, J, & Margolinas, C. (2013). Introduction to theme B: Accounting for student perspectives in task design. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education: The 22nd ICMI study.
Anthony, C. M. O. (2013) Designing tasks to foster operative apprehension for visualization and reasoning in dynamic geometry environment. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education: The 22nd ICMI study.
Caron, F., & Steinke, T. (2005). Learning in the presence of technology: Report of the CMEF working group. In Proceedings of the 2005 Canadian Mathematics Education Forum, Québec, Canada.
Drijvers, P., Mariotti, M. A., Olive, J., & Sacristán, A. I. (2010). Introduction to section 2. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—rethinking the terrain: The 17th ICMI study.
Job, P., & Schneider, M. (2013). On what epistemological thinking brings (or does not bring) to the analysis of tasks in terms of potentialities for mathematical learning. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education: The 22nd ICMI study.
Joubert, M. (2013). A framework for examining student learning of mathematics: Tasks using technology. In Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8).
Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283–317.
Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Sträßer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 275–304).
Madison, B. L. (2006). Tensions and tethers: Assessing learning in undergraduate mathematics. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Supporting assessment in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 3–10). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
Mariotti, M. A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 173–204). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ng, O., & Sinclair, N. (2015). “Area without numbers”: Using Touchscreen dynamic geometry to reason about shape. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(1), 84–101.
Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kor, L. K., Kosheleva, O., & Sträßer, R. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. In: Proceedings of the 17th ICMI Study (Vol. 8, pp. 133–177).
Sangwin, C., Cazes, C., Lee. A., & Wong K. L. (2010). Micro-level automatic assessment supported by digital technologies, Chap. 10. In The 17th ICMI study.
Savard, A., Polotskaia, E., Freiman, V., Gervais, C. (2013). Tasks to promote holistic flexible reasoning about simple additive structures. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education: The 22nd ICMI study.
Sinclair, M. P. (2003). Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 289–317.
Sinclair, N., & Jackiw, N. (2010). Learning through teaching, when teaching machines. In R. Leikin & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning through teaching. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: assessing the theory and evidence. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3015–3022.
Thomas, M. O. J., & Lin, C. (2013). Designing tasks for use with digital technology. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education: The 22nd ICMI study.
Trouche, L. (2005). Calculators in mathematics education: A rapid evolution of tools, with differential effects. In D. Guin, et al. (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (pp. 9–40). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Venturini, M. (2015). How teachers think about the role of digital technologies in student assessment in mathematics (Ph.D. thesis). Simon Fraser University, Canada and University of Bologna, Italy.
Wilson, P. (2008). Teacher education: Technology’s conduit to the classroom. In K. Heid & G. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology in the learning and teaching of mathematics, volume 2: Cases and perspectives. Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/Information Age Publishing.
Zazkis, R., Sinclair, N., & Liljedahl, P. (2013). Lesson play in mathematics education. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Venturini, M., Sinclair, N. (2017). Designing Assessment Tasks in a Dynamic Geometry Environment. In: Leung, A., Baccaglini-Frank, A. (eds) Digital Technologies in Designing Mathematics Education Tasks. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43421-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43423-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)