Abstract
Scientific discovery and priority are entangled concepts, and no more so than in the case of bacteriophage. The initial recognition of certain bacteriolytic phenomena constituted a “fact” that begged for explanation. The recognition of such a fact, however, cannot be fully accepted as a discovery. The “fact” must be integrated into existing or novel paradigms and explanations and meanings must be accepted by the scientific community. At some point during that integration process, the fact seems to expand into a stable discovery by accretion of other facts, contexts, theoretical explanations, and general understanding. Thus, discovery seems to be a process rather than event. The first “facts” related to bacteriophage were observations made in the second decade of the twentieth century. The integration of these observations into scientific paradigms was a process that was not fully complete until about 1940. The discovery of phage, in this sense, did not occur with a eureka moment, but instead by the usual scientific process of evolution over time. One casualty of this way of thinking about discovery is the habit of assigning priority based on something with intrinsic uncertainty.
Notes
- 1.
Historians of science recognize a distinction between a “fact” and an “interpretation” of that fact. A fact is often an experimental or natural observation, e.g., the observation of plaques or the lysis of a culture, which by themselves are noncontroversial. Their interpretation, however, attempts to fit the facts into accepted paradigms or theories, or as Kuhn (1962) has argued, may force paradigm changes. New technologies often are thought of as “fact making” because they provide new types and extents of observations.
References
Abedon ST et al (2011) Bacteriophage prehistory. Is or is not Hankin, 1896, a phage reference? Bacteriophage 1:174–178
Amsterdamska O (1991) Stabilizing instability: the controversy over cyclogenic theories of bacterial variation during the interwar period. J Hist Biol 24:101–222
Arago F (1839) Historical eloge of James Watt by M. Arago … Trans. from the French, with additional notes and an appendix by James Patrick Muirhead. J. Murray, London
Berkefeld W (1890) Simple means for scouring filter. US Patent 422,112, 25 Feb 1890
Bordet J, Ciuca M (1920) Exsudats leucocytaires et autolyse microbienne transmissible. CR Soc Biol 83:1293–1295
Bronfenbrenner J (1926) Does bacteriophage respire? Science 63:51–52
Bronfenbrenner J (1928) Virus diseases of bacteria – bacteriophagy. In: Rivers TM (ed) Filterable viruses. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 373–417
Burnet FM (1968) Changing patterns: an atypical autobiography. William Heinemann, Melbourne
Chamberland C (1884) Sur un filtre donnant l’eau physiologiquement pure. CR Acad Sci Paris 99:247–248
d’Herelle F (1917) Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bacilles dysentériques. CR Acad Sci Paris 165:373–375
d’Herelle F (1926) The bacteriophage and its behavior. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
De Schweinitz EA, Dorset M (1903) A form of hog cholera not caused by the hog-cholera bacillus, vol 41. US Bureau of Animal Industry Circular, Washington, DC
DeKruif P (1962) The sweeping wind: a memoir. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York
Duckworth DH (1976) Who discovered bacteriophage? Bact Rev 40:793–802
Elford WJ, Andrewes CH (1932) The sizes of different bacteriophages. Brit J Exptl Path 13:446–456
Ellis EL, Delbrück M (1939) The growth of bacteriophage. J Gen Physiol 22:365–384
Fildes P (1951) Frederick William Twort. 1877–1950. Obit Notice Fellows R Soc 7:504–517
Fleming A (1922) On a remarkable bacteriolytic element found in tissues and secretions. Proc R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 93:306–317
Gratia A (1921) Studies on the d'Herelle phenomenon. J Exp Med 34:115–126
Gratia A (1930) The Twort phenomenon and bacteriophagy. CR Soc Biol 105:219–222
Holmes FL (2001) Meselson, Stahl, and the replication of DNA: a history of “the most beautiful experiment in biology”. Yale University Press, New Haven
Holmes FL (2006) In: Summers WC (ed) Reconceiving the gene: Seymour Benzer’s adventures in phage genetics. Yale University Press, New Haven
Hull DL (1988) Science as a process: an evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn T (1962) Historical structure of scientific discovery. Science 136:760–764
Lwoff A (1957) The concept of virus. J Gen Microbiol 17:239–253
Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am Soc Rev 22:635–659
Northrop JH (1939) Crystalline enzymes. The chemistry of pepsin, trypsin, and bacteriophage. Columbia University Press, New York
Pfeiffer R (1894) Weitere Untersuchungen über das Wesen der Choleraimmunität und über specifisch baktericide Processe. Zeitsch f Hyg u Infekt 18:1–16
Pirie NW (1990) The career of F.W. Twort. Nature 343:504
Schlesinger M (1936) The Feulgen reaction of the bacteriophage substance. Nature 138:508–509
Sertic V, Boulgakov N (1935) Classification et identification des typhi-phages. CR Soc Biol 119:1270–1272
Summers WC (1991) From culture as organism to organism as cell: historical origins of bacterial genetics. J Hist Biol 24:171–190
Summers WC (2011) In the beginning…. Bacteriophage 1:50
Twort FW (1915) An investigation on the nature of ultra-microscopic viruses. Lancet 186:1241–1243
Van Helvoort T (1992) Bacteriological and physiological research styles in the early controversy on the nature of the bacteriophage phenomenon. Med Hist 36:243–270
Wollman E (1935) The phenomenon of Twort-d'Herelle and its significance. Lancet 226:1312–1314
Zinsser H, Bayne-Jones S (1938) Textbook of bacteriology, 8th edn. Appleton Century, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Summers, W.C. (2017). The Discovery of Bacteriophages and the Historical Context. In: Harper, D., Abedon, S., Burrowes, B., McConville, M. (eds) Bacteriophages. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40598-8_11-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40598-8_11-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40598-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40598-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences