Skip to main content

Does Navigation Improve Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy? Comparison Between Navigated and Non-navigated Percutaneous and Open Fixations

  • Conference paper
Trends in Reconstructive Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 124))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:606–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Assaker R, Reyns N, Vinchon M, Demondion X, Louis E (2001) Transpedicular screw placement: image-guided versus lateral-view fluoroscopy: in vitro simulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2160–2164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ (2002) Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2503–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benzel EC, Rupp FW, McCormack BM, Baldwin NG, Anson JA, Adams MS (1995) A comparison of fluoscopy and computed tomography-derived volumetric multiple exposure transmission holography for the guidance of lumbar pedicle screw insertion. Neurosurgery 37:711–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bydon M, Xu R, Amin AG, Macki M, Kaloostian P, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF (2014) Safety and efficacy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography: consecutive series of 1148 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 21:320–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi WW, Green BA, Levi AD (2000) Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion. Neurosurgery 47:872–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebmeier K, Giest K, Kalff R (2003) Intraoperative computerized tomography for improved accuracy of spinal navigation in pedicle screw placement of the thoracic spine. Acta Neurochir Suppl 85:105–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farber GL, Place HM, Mazur RA, Jones DE, Damiano TR (1995) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1494–1499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT, Liang YC, Chen LH, Chen WJ (2008) Pedicle screw insertion: computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop 32:517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, Ploumis A, Xenakis TA (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21:247–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:11–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holly LT, Foley KT (2007) Image guidance in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 38:451–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holly LT (2006) Image-guided spinal surgery. Int J Med Robot 2:7–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hott JS, Deshmukh VR, Klopfenstein JD, Sonntag VKH, Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Robert F, Papadopoulos SM (2004) Intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation in craniospinal surgery: the first 60 cases. Neurosurgery 54:1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito Y, Sugimoto Y, Tomioka M, Hasegawa Y, Nakago K, Yagata Y (2008) Clinical accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 9:450–453

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson RG, Murphy M, Miller M (1989) Fusions and trans-fusions. An analysis of blood loss and autologous replacement during lumbar fusions. Spine 14:358–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, Tateiwa Y, Kinoshita T, Takaoka K (2000) Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. J Spinal Disord 13:218–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Riew KD (2005) Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized romography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2084–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E111–E120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Takahata M, Sudo H, Ohshima S, Minami A (2007) Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1543–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Laine T, Lund T, Ylikoski M, Lohikoski J, Schlenzka D (2000) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Eur Spine J 9:235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Laine T, Makitalo K, Schlenzka D, Tallroth K, Poussa M, Alho A (1997) Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 6:402–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Laine T, Schlenzka D, Makitalo K, Tallroth K, Nolte LP, Visarius H (1997) Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1254–1258

    Google Scholar 

  24. Neo M, Sakamoto T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2005) The clinical risk of vertebral artery injury from cervical pedicle screws inserted in degenerative vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2800–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Robert Kolen E, Jun P, Rosenberg WS, Weinstein PR (2006) Accuracy over space and time of computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation in the lumbar spine in vivo. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R (2005) Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2280–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ringel F, Stoffel M, Stuer C, Meyer B (2006) Minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 59:ONS361–ONS367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux D, Salgado V (1976) Osteosynthesis of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures with metal plates screwed through the vertebral pedicles. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 15:2–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H, Katayama Y, Imagama S, Ito Z, Ishiguro N (2008) Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:181–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakamoto T, Neo M, Nakamura T (2004) Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2510–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, Hartl R (2012) Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 17:113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Silbermann J, Riese F, Allam Y, Reichert T, Koeppert H, Gutberlet M (2011) Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 20:875–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P, Ozdoba C, Vock P (1999) Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:975–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, Zhou Y, Wu RK, Lou Y, Xu HZ (2011) Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J 20:846–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tian NF, Xu HZ (2009) Image guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33:895–903

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tjardes T, Shafizadeh S, Rixen D, Paffrath T, Bouillon B, Steinhausen ES, Bäthis H (2010) Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions. Eur Spine J 19:25–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tormenti MJ, Kostov DB, Gardner PA, Kanter AS, Spiro RM, Okonkwo DO (2010) Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A (2010) Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 19:370–375

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Von Jako R, Finn MA, Yonemura KS, Araghi A, Khoo LT, Carrino JA, Perez-Cruet M (2011) Minimally invasive percutaneous transpedicular screw fixation: increased accuracy and reduced radiation exposure by means of a novel electromagnetic navigation system. Acta Neurochir 153:589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu R, Ebraheim A, Shepherd ME, Yeasting RA (1999) Thoracic pedicle screw placement guided by computed tomographic measurements. J Spinal Disord 12:222–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest Statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gualtiero Innocenzi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Innocenzi, G., Bistazzoni, S., D’Ercole, M., Cardarelli, G., Ricciardi, F. (2017). Does Navigation Improve Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy? Comparison Between Navigated and Non-navigated Percutaneous and Open Fixations. In: Visocchi, M., Mehdorn, H.M., Katayama, Y., von Wild, K.R.H. (eds) Trends in Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39546-3_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39545-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39546-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics