Abstract
Enterprise modeling has been defined as the ‘art of externalizing enterprise knowledge’. Traditional approaches to enterprise modeling rely on ‘blueprint thinking’ that focuses on the formal structure and organization of the enterprise, with business processes being the fundamental components of the enterprise operation. Such approaches generally assume enterprises as deterministic, top-down managed entities, with a well-defined group of processes that develop and maintain products or services for their customers. However, the prevalence and volatility of digital enterprises shifts enterprise modeling towards a more dynamic enterprise configuration, to embrace the idea of dynamic adaptation according to the internal and external influences that constantly (re-)shape the business environment. To this end, enterprise modeling research has adopted model-driven development methods and service-oriented architectures originating from the software development domain, as a means to achieve flexible service delivery and the notion of dynamic capability from the strategic management domain in order to address adaptation to the dynamic business context. This chapter will outline emergent trends in the field, introduce a conceptual framework for the capability-driven development of enterprise knowledge and discuss how this can be used to enable the design of capabilities and services using examples from an eGovernment case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gates, B.: Buisness @ the Speed of Thought. Grant Central Publishing (2009)
Rouse, W.B.: A theory of enterprise transformation. Syst. Eng. 8(4) (2005)
Sanz, J.: Customer experience and front-office transformation enabled by business process engineering. In: International Conference on Business Informatics, 2013, IEEE, Vienna (2013)
Ross, D.: Applications and extensions of SADT. IEEE Comput. 18(4), 25–34 (1985)
Goranson, H.T.: Dimensions of enterprise integration. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on ‘Enterprise Integration Modeling’, 1992, pp. 101–113. MIT Press (1992)
Petrie, C.J. (ed.): Proceedings of the 1st Conference on ‘Enterprise Integration Modeling’. Scientific and Engineering Computation Series, 1992. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, UK (1992)
Kosanke, K., Vlietstra, J.: CIM-OSA—its goals, scope, contents and achievements. In: ESPRIT’89, 1989, pp. 661–673, Brussels (1989)
Lamsweerde, A.V.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 2001, p. 249. IEEE Computer Society (2001)
Kavakli, V., Loucopoulos, P.: Modelling of Organisational Change Using the EKD Framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. http://cais.isworld.org (1999)
Yu, E.: Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (1995)
Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: From ER to “AR”—modelling strategic actor relationships for business process reengineering. In: Entity-Relationship Approach—ER’94 Business Modelling and Re-Engineering, 1994, pp. 548–565 (1994)
OPENGROUP: TOGAF—Enterprise Architecture Methodology, Version 9.1. http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/ (2012)
OPENGROUP: ArchiMate—Modelling Language for Enterprise Architecture, V2.0. https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/catalog/c118 (2012)
Karagiannis, D., Niksa, N.: Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS): The ADOxx Metamodelling Platform, Information Technologies—A Strategic Priority for the Knowledge Economy, 2011, 14–15 Oct 2011, Shvistov, Bulgaria (2011)
OPEN-GROUP: SOA Reference Architecture. The Open Group (2009)
OPEN-GROUP: Service Oriented Architecture: What is SOA? 2012. http://www.opengroup.org/soa/source-book/soa/soa.htm (2012)
Molnar, W.A., Korhonen, J.J.: Research Paradigms and Topics in Enterprise Engineering: Analysis of Recent Conferences and Workshops, IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, 28–30 May 2014, Marrakesh, Morocco (2014)
Danesh, M.H., Loucopoulos, P., Yu, E.: Dynamic capabilities for sustainable enterprise IT—a modeling framework. In: 34th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2015), Stockholm, Sweden (2015)
DoD: Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems, Aug 2008, Washington DC (2008)
Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg. Manage. J. 24(997–1010) (2003)
Teece, D.J.: Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Oxford University Press, United States, New York (2009)
Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage. 17, 99–120 (1991)
Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)
Cook, D.:, Business-Capability Mapping: Staying Ahead of the Joneses (2007)
Greski, L.: Business Capability modeling: theory and practice. Arch. Gov. (2014)
Danesh, M.H., Yu, E.: Modeling enterprise capabilities with i*: reasoning on alternatives. In: International Workshop on Advances in Services DEsign based on the Notion of CApabiliy (ASDENCA’14), pp. 112–123. Springer, Thessaloniki, Greece (2014)
Rosen, M.: Business Processes Start with Capabilities. BP Trends 2010; Available from: http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/12-07-10-COL-BPM&SOA-BusProcesses%20begin%20with%20Capabilities%201003%20v01-Rosen.pdf (2010)
Ulrich, W., Rosen, M.: The business capability map: the “Rosetta Stone” of Business/IT alignment. Enterp. Arch. 14(2) (2014)
Stirna, J., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development—an approach to support evolving organizations. In: Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Stirna, J. (eds.) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 2012, pp. 117–131. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)
Iacob, M.-E., Quartel, D., Jonkers, H.: Capturing business strategy and value in enterprise architecture to support portfolio valuation. In: 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2012), 2012, pp. 11–20. IEEE (2012)
Homann, U.: A Business-Oriented Foundation for Service Orientation. Microsoft Developer Network (2006)
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manage. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)
Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T., Czubayko, U., España, S., Grabis, J., Henkel, M., Jokste, L., Kampars, J., Koc, H., Kuhr, J.-C., Llorca, C., Loucopoulos, P., Juanes, R., Pastor, O., Sandkuhl, K., Simic, H., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(1), 15–25 (2015)
Azevedo, C.L.B., Iacob, M.-E., Almeida, J.P.A., Sinderen, Mv, Pires, L.F., Guizzardi, G.: Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture: a well-founded ontology-based proposal for ArchiMate. Inf. Syst. 2015(54), 235–262 (2015)
Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Almeida, J.o.P.A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) story. Appl. Ontol. 10(3–4) (2015)
Loucopoulos, P., Stratigaki, C., Danesh, M.H., Bravos, G., Anagnostopoulos, D., Dimitrakopoulos, G.: Enterprise capability modeling: concepts, method and application. In: 3rd International Conference on Enterprise Systems, 2015. Basel, Switzerland (2015)
Zikra, I., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Bringing enterprise modeling closer to model-driven development. Pract. Enterp. Model. 2011, 268–282 (2011)
Kardasis, P., Loucopoulos, P.: A roadmap for the elicitation of business rules in information systems projects. Bus. Process Manage. J. 11(4), 316–348 (2005)
Kavakli, E., Loucopoulos, P.: Experiences with goal-oriented modelling of organisational change. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.—Part C 36(2), 221–235 (2006)
Loucopoulos, P.: Experiences with modelling early requirements. In: Soderstrom, P.J.E. (ed.) Information Systems Engineering. IGI Publishing (2008)
Loucopoulos, P., Katsouli, E.: Modelling business rules in an office environment. SIGOIS Bull. 13(2), 28–37 (1992)
Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, V.: Enterprise knowledge management and conceptual modelling. In: Goos, G., et al. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Current Issues and Future Directions, pp. 123–143. Springer (1999)
OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 2.1. Object Management Group (2009)
Kavakli, P., Loucopoulos, E.: Enterprise modelling and the teleological approach to requirements engineering. Int. J. Intell. Coop. Inf. Syst. 4(1), 45–79 (1995)
Kavakli, V., Loucopoulos, P.: Goal-driven business process analysis—application in electricity deregulation. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 187–207 (1999)
Heidari, F., Loucopoulos, P.: Quality Evaluation Framework (QEF): modeling and evaluating quality of business processes. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 15(3), 193–223 (2014)
Ghosh, P., Sharma, A., Chakrabarti, P.P., Dasgupta, P.: Algorithms for generating ordered solutions for explicit AND/OR structures. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2012(44), 275–333 (2012)
Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D., Marciniak, J.: The goal question metric approach. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 528–532. Wiley, New York, NY, USA (1994)
James, A., Chung, J.-Y.: Business and industry specific cloud: challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 48(C), 39–45 (2015)
Gongolidis, E., Kalloniatis, C., Kavakli, E.: Requirements identification for migrating eGovernment applications to the cloud. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP TC5/8 International Conference (ICT-EurAsia), pp. 150–158. Springer (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, E. (2016). Capability Oriented Enterprise Knowledge Modeling: The CODEK Approach. In: Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H., Mylopoulos, J. (eds) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39417-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39417-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39416-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39417-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)