Abstract
Cervical total disc replacement is a routinely used treatment for radiculopathy due to degenerative disease of the cervical spine. The procedure originated to avoid some of the complications seen with the traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Appropriate patient selection is paramount to obtain acceptable patient outcomes, with particular indications and contraindications for these procedures. As the procedure gained more acceptance, several cervical artificial discs have been developed and, subsequently, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Each of the eight FDA-approved devices is briefly reviewed in this chapter including outcomes from device-specific studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW Jr et al (2014) Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(4):516–528. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996
Cloward RB (2007) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. 1958. J Neurosurg Spine 6(5):496–511. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.5.496
Coric D, Nunley P, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody C, Gordon C, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss D, Boltes MO (2011) Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex®|C artificial disc IDE study with minimum two year follow-up. J Neurosurg-Spine 15:348–358
DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH et al (2003) Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):314–323
Dohler JR, Kahn MR, Hughes SP (1985) Instability of the cervical spine after anterior interbody fusion. A study on its incidence and clinical significance in 21 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 104(4):247–250
Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(22):2431–2434. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000031261.66972.B1
Fuller DA, Kirkpatrick JS, Emery SE et al (1998) A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(15):1649–1656
Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J et al (2003) Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(24):2673–2678. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK et al (2017) Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine 26(6):653–667. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264
Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM et al (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263
Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA et al (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):519–528
Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R et al (2016) Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 10:10. https://doi.org/10.14444/3010
Loumeau TP, Darden BV, Kesman TJ et al (2016) A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eur Spine J 25(7):2263–2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4431-6
Lauryssen C, Coric D, Dimmig T, Musante D, Ohnmeiss DD, Stubbs HA (2012) Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration-regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up. Int J Spine Surg 6:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.001
Mummaneni PV, Haid RW (2004) The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):155–159. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0155
Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW et al (2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):198–209. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198
Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM et al (2015) Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(10):674–683. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869
Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N (2005) Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(17):1949–1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000176320.82079.ce
Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A(3):607–624
Vaccaro A, Beutler W, Peppelman W et al (2013) Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(26):2227–2239. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000031
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Miller, C., Bandlish, D., Gulati, P., Thottempudi, S., Coric, D., Mummaneni, P. (2019). Cervical Total Disc Replacement: FDA-Approved Devices. In: Cheng, B. (eds) Handbook of Spine Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33037-2_71-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33037-2_71-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33037-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33037-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences