Abstract
Non-scholarly sources of information (e.g., non-peer-reviewed popular press and mass media articles) have been shown to shape individual opinions about global climate change (GCC) and subsequently reinforce those opinions by isolating individuals from dissenting viewpoints. The diversity of non-scholarly material surrounding the public GCC debate provides an opportunity to critically evaluate these sources and demonstrate to students the dangers of citing non-scholarly sources. In this chapter’s activity, students will be assigned readings as homework, answer questions about the readings individually and with a small team, and then work with their teams to understand broader issues raised by the readings. After completing this activity, students should be able to (1) know that non-scholarly sources need to be critically evaluated because they may not be reliable, (2) recognize that all sources of information are potentially biased, and (3) discuss, in a general sense, how and why GCC science can be misreported and/or misconstrued by non-scholarly sources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
AAAS (2014) What we know. http://whatweknow.aaas.org/. Accessed 1 Mar 2015
Cook J (2015) Global warming and climate change myths. https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php. Accessed 1 Mar 2015
Davidson N, Major CH, Michaelsen LK (2014) Small-group learning in higher education—cooperative, collaborative, problem-based, and team-based learning: an introduction by the guest editors. J Excel Coll Teach 25:1–6
Davis PM (2003) Effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: guiding student scholarship in a networked age. Portal Libr Acad 3:41–51
Feldman L, Myers TA, Hmielowski JD et al (2014) The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. J Comm 64:590–611
Markey K, Leeder C, Taylor CL (2012) Playing games to improve the quality of the sources students cite in their papers. Ref User Serv Q 52:123–135
Michaelsen LK, Watson WE, Cragin JP et al (1982) Team-based learning: a potential solution to the problems of large classes. Exchange Organ Behav Teach J 7:13–22
Michaelsen LK, Bauman-Knight A, Fink LD (2002) Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups. Praeger, New York
Robinson AM, Schlegl K (2004) Student bibliographies improve when professors provide enforceable guidelines for citations. Portal Libr Acad 4:275–290
Robinson AM, Schlegl K (2005) Student use of the Internet for research projects: a problem? Our problem? What can we do about it? PS 38:311–315
Acknowledgments
Thanks go to my climate change students at Rowan University for helping develop this activity and to R. Hoffman, O. Lopez and K. Behling for introducing me to TBL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplemental Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruhl, N. (2016). Critically Evaluating Non-Scholarly Sources Through Team-Based Learning. In: Byrne, L. (eds) Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28541-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28543-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)