Skip to main content

Self-Adjusting Reject Options in Prototype Based Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Self-Organizing Maps and Learning Vector Quantization

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 428))

Abstract

Reject options in classification play a major role whenever the costs of a misclassification are higher than the costs to postpone the decision, prime examples being safety critical systems, medical diagnosis, or models which rely on user interaction and user acceptance. While optimum reject options can be computed analytically in case of a probabilistic generative classification model, it is not clear how to optimally integrate reject strategies into efficient deterministic counterparts, such as popular learning vector quantization (LVQ). Recently, first techniques propose promising a posteriori strategies for an efficient reject in such cases (Fischer et al. Neurocomputing, 2015 [7]). In this contribution, we take a different point of view and formalize optimum reject via an integrated cost function. We show that an efficient approximation of these costs together with a geometric reject rule leads to an extension of LVQ which not only aligns the classification model along the reject costs but also self-adjusts an optimum reject threshold while training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arlt, W., Biehl, M., Taylor, A.E., Hahner, S., Libe, R., Hughes, B.A., Schneider, P., Smith, D.J., Stiekema, H., Krone, N., et al.: Urine steroid metabolomics as a biomarker tool for detecting malignancy in adrenal tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96(12), 3775–3784 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett, P.L., Wegkamp, M.H.: Classification with a reject option using a hinge loss. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 1823–1840 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengio, Y.: Learning deep architectures for AI. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2(1), 1–127 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Biehl, M., Sadowski, P., Bhanot, G., Bilal, E., Dayarian, A., Meyer, P., Norel, R., Rhrissorrakrai, K., Zeller, M.D., Hormoz, S.: Inter-species prediction of protein phosphorylation in the sbv IMPROVER species translation challenge. Bioinformatics 31(4), 453–461 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chow, C.: On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16(1), 41–46 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. fan Wu, T., Lin, C.-J., Weng, R.C.: Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 975–1005 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, L., Hammer, B., Wersing, H.: Efficient rejection strategies for prototype-based classification. Neurocomputing, page to appear (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, L., Hammer, B., Wersing, H.: Optimum reject options for prototype-based classification. CoRR, arXiv:1503.06549 (2015)

  9. Giotis, I., Bunte, K., Petkov, N., Biehl, M.: Adaptive matrices and filters for color texture classification. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 47(1–2), 79–92 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Grandvalet, Y., Rakotomamonjy, A., Keshet, J., Canu, S.: Support vector machines with a reject option. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, December 8–11, pp. 537–544 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herbei, R., Wegkamp, M.: Classification with reject option. Can. J. Stat. 34(4), 709–721 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaden, M., Hermann, W., Villmann, T.: Attention based classification learning in GLVQ and asymmetric classification error assessment. In: Villmann, T., Schleif, F.-M., Kaden, M., Lange, M. (eds.) Advances in Self-Organizing Maps and Learning Vector Quantization: Proceedings of 10th International Workshop WSOM 2014. Mittweida, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 295, pp. 77–88. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaden, M., Lange, M., Nebel, D., Riedel, M., Geweniger, T., Villmann, T.: Aspects in classification learning—review of recent developments in learning vector quantization. Found. Comput. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 79–105 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirstein, S., Wersing, H., Gross, H., Körner, E.: A life-long learning vector quantization approach for interactive learning of multiple categories. Neural Netw. 28, 90–105 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohonen, T.: Learning vector quantization for pattern recognition. Report TKK-F-A601, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pillai, I., Fumera, G., Roli, F.: Multi-label classification with a reject option. Pattern Recognit. 46(8), 2256–2266 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Platt, J.C.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In: Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 61–74. MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Polikar, R., Alippi, C.: Guest editorial learning in nonstationary and evolving environments. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25(1), 9–11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Stefano, C., Sansone, C., Vento, M.: To reject or not to reject: That is the question - an answer in case of neural classifiers. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.—Part C: Appl. Rev. 30(1), 84–94 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saralajew, S., Villmann, T., Söhner, S.: An application of the generalized matrix learning vector quantization method for cut-off-line classification of automobile-headlights. Machine Learning Reports 9(MLR-01-2015), 1–16 (2015). ISSN:1865–3960, http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~fschleif/mlr/mlr_01_2015.pdf

  21. Sato, A.S., Yamada, K.: Generalized learning vector quantization. In: Tesauro, G., Touretzky, D., Leen, T. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 7, pp. 423–429. MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schleif, F., Villmann, T., Kostrzewa, M., Hammer, B., Gammerman, A.: Cancer informatics by prototype networks in mass spectrometry. Artif. Intell. Med. 45(2–3), 215–228 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider, P., Hammer, B., Biehl, M.: Adaptive relevance matrices in learning vector quantization. Neural Comput. 21, 3532–3561 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Senge, R., Bösner, S., Dembczynski, K., Haasenritter, J., Hirsch, O., Donner-Banzhoff, N., Hüllermeier, E.: Learning classifiers that distinguish aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty: reliable classification. Inf. Sci. 255, 16–29 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. de Vries, G., Pauws, S.C., Biehl, M.: Insightful stress detection from physiology modalities using learning vector quantization. Neurocomputing 151, 873–882 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan, M., Wegkamp, M.H.: Classification methods with reject option based on convex risk minimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 111–130 (2010)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, X., Schleif, F., Hammer, B.: Adaptive conformal semi-supervised vector quantization for dissimilarity data. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 49, 138–145 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by the LIFE—Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, University Leipzig. LIFE is funded by means of the European Union, by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and by means of the Free State of Saxony within the framework of the excellence initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T. Villmann or B. Hammer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Villmann, T. et al. (2016). Self-Adjusting Reject Options in Prototype Based Classification. In: Merényi, E., Mendenhall, M., O'Driscoll, P. (eds) Advances in Self-Organizing Maps and Learning Vector Quantization. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 428. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28518-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28518-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28517-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28518-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics