Skip to main content

Theories, Models and Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Science for Scientists

Part of the book series: Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy ((SUTP))

Abstract

Scientists extensively use the concept of a model. In this chapter I discuss what might be meant by the claim that something is a model of something else. The core idea is that a model is similar to what it is a model of in some respects and not in other respects. Similarity is a kind of structural similarity. Most models used in the natural sciences are mathematical models. Such models are structurally similar to a portion of reality in some respects.

Some examples of models are presented and the respects in which they show structural similarity to what is modelled are discussed. The question whether it is in principle possible to construct a complete model of (a part of) reality is discussed and a tentative positive answer is suggested. Finally, I briefly discuss the ontological question of what exists and concludes with Quine that ‘Structure is what matters to science and not the choice of its objects’.

Structure is what matters to a theory, not the choice of objects.

W. V. O. Quine

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have given my view on quantum mechanics in my (2007).

Further Reading

  • Brown, J. (1994). Smoke and mirrors (How science reflects reality). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., & Garcia-Banuelos, L. (2009a). Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In U. Dayal et al. (Eds.), Business process management. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (2002). Representation and invariance of scientific structures. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, M. (2003). Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johansson, LG. (2016). Theories, Models and Reality. In: Philosophy of Science for Scientists. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26551-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics