Skip to main content

Superintendent Leadership in Hierarchy and Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain

Part of the book series: Educational Governance Research ((EGTU,volume 2))

Abstract

School superintendents are coupled hierarchically with the top apex of municipality organization through their membership of leadership teams and through personal ties to the top municipal manager, which provides opportunities to take part in strategic decision-making processes beyond the educational sector. Superintendents are also vertically linked to their school leaders through strong and dense network ties. Along the horizontal axis superintendents are active network players with peers, for example through superintendent associations or more frequently mentioned through personal ties to superintendent colleagues. Superintendents are linked to school boards through strong formal ties. In this chapter, the formation and utilization of network ties within the hierarchy by superintendents is analyzed in concert with horizontal network with peers. School board networking within hierarchy and with the political power center of the municipality is analyzed. Finally, the use that school leaders make of the network in relation to superintendents is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blau, P., & Scott, W. R. (2003). Formal organizations. A comparative approach. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 991–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Calaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. (2001). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. In K. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1997). Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, G. (1983). Forhandlingsøkonomi og blandingsadministrasjon [Negotiation-economy and blended administration]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homme, A. D. (2008). Den kommunale skolen. Det lokale skolefeltet i historisk perspektiv [The municipal school. The local school field analyzed from a historical perspective]. Doctoral dissertation. University of Bergen, Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2010). Types of multi-level governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyer, H. C., & Wood, E. (2011). Trust and control: Public administration and risk society. International Journal of Learning and Change, 5(2), 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Høyer, H. C., Paulsen, J. M., Nihlfors, E., Kofod, K., Kanervio, P., & Pulkkinen, S. (2014). Control and trust in local school governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process (pp. 101–116). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, O., Nihlfors, E., & Steen, L. J. (2014). School boards and their functions in Sweden. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives. Designing effective organizations. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. M., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nihlfors, E., & Johansson, O. (2013). Rektor – en stark länk i styrningen av skolan [The school principal-a strong linkage in school governing]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordby, T. (1994). Korporatisme på norsk [Corporatism in Norwegian]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, J. M., Flaherty, K. E., & Wooldridge, B. (2004). Tapping into hospital champions-strategic middle managers. Health Care Management Review, 29(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. M. (2014). Norwegian superintendents as mediators of change initiatives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13, 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. M., & Hjertø, K. B. (2014). Exploring individual-level and group-level levers for inter-organizational knowledge transfer. The Learning Organization, 21(4), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. M., & Moos, L. (2014). Globalisation and Europeanisation of Nordic governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. M., & Skedsmo, G. (2014). Mediating tensions between state control, local autonomy and professional trust. Norwegian School District Leadership in Practice. In A. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation: An international perspective. New York: Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, J. M., & Strand, M. (2014). School boards in Norway. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations. A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall: Pearson Education International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Who are the influentials? A cross-state social network analysis of the reading policy domain. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998a). Governance as theory. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998b). Governance as theory: Five propositions: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as a part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thune, T. (2006). Formation of research collaboration between universities and firms. Doctoral dissertation, BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Characteristics and external orientation of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wageman, R., Nunes, D. A., Burruss, J. A., & Hackman, J. R. (2008). Senior leadership teams. What it takes to make them great. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Merok Paulsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paulsen, J.M., Nihlfors, E., Brinkkjær, U., Risku, M. (2016). Superintendent Leadership in Hierarchy and Network. In: Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J. (eds) Nordic Superintendents: Agents in a Broken Chain. Educational Governance Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25106-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25104-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25106-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics