Skip to main content

Characterization of Soft Matter at Interfaces by Optical Means

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Matter at Aqueous Interfaces

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 917))

  • 2740 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I give a brief overview, which is biased by personal experience, on how various optical techniques can be used for characterization of soft matter at interfaces, including ellipsometry, light scattering, and total internal reflection geometries. Without discussing the technical details and theoretical foundations of the methods, I focus on what can be learned by applying the individual techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Lekner, Theory of Reflection:of Electromagnetic and Particle Waves (Springer, Dordrecht, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.M.A. Azzam, N.M. Bashara, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.G. Tompkins, A User’s Guide to Ellipsometry (Dover Publication Inc, New. York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Fujiwara, Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: Principles and Applications (Wiley, New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Handbook of Ellipsometry, ed. by H.G. Tompkins, E.A. Irene (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.L. Keddie, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 6, 102 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Johannsmann, Investigations of soft organic films with ellipsometry. in Functional Polymer Films, ed. by W. Knoll, R.C. Advincula (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Ogieglo, H. Wormeester, K.-J. Eichhorn, M. Wessling, N.E. Benes, In situ ellipsometry studies on swelling of thin polymer films: a review. Progress in Polymer Science, 2014, in ress. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079670014001063)

  10. J.D. Willott, T.J. Murdoch, B.A. Humphreys, S. Edmondson, G.B. Webber, E.J. Wanless, Critical salt effects in the swelling behavior of a weak polybasic brush. Langmuir 30(7), 1827–1836 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.C. Charmet, P.G. Degennes, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1777 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Toomey, M. Tirrell, In situ investigation of adsorbed amphiphilic block copolymers by ellipsometry and neutron reflectometry in soft matter characterization. ed. by R. Borsali, R. Pecora (Springer, Netherlands, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Stocco, G. Su, M. Nobili, M. Inab, D. Wang, In situ assessment of the contact angles of nanoparticles adsorbed at fluid interfaces by multiple angle of incidence ellipsometry. Soft Matter 10, 6999–7007 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Desbat, S. Castano, Brewster angle microscopy and imaging ellipsometry. in Encyclopedia of Biophysics ed. by G.C.K. Roberts (Springer, 2013), pp. 196–200

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.G.A.L. Aarts, M. Schmidt, H.N.W. Lekkerkerker, Direct visual observation of thermal capillary waves. Science 304(5672), 847–850 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Granick, S.C. Bae, Molecular motion at soft and hard interfaces: from phospholipid bilayers to polymers and lubricants. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 353 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Yu, J. Guan, K. Chen, S.C. Bae, Steve G., Single-molecule observation of long jumps in polymer adsorption. ACS Nano 7, 9735 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Prieve, Measurement of colloidal forces with TIRM. Adv Coll. Interface Sci. 82, 93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Cicuta, I. Hopkinson, Recent developments of surface light scattering as a tool for optical-rheology of polymer monolayers. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng. Aspects 233, 97–107 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A.R. Esker, C. Kim, H. Yu, Polymer monolayer dynamics. Adv. Polym. Sci. 209(1), 59–110 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Sigel, Light scattering near and from interfaces using evanescent wave and ellipsometric light scattering. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 14(6), 426–437 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. F. de Fornel, Evanescent Waves, From Newtonian Optics to Atomic Optics, vol 73 (Springer Series in Optical Sciences, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of the work was presented as as a lecture at the SOMATAI summer school 2014 in Berlin. The support of the Greek ESPA programme Areistea RINGS is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoit Loppinet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Total Internal Reflection and Evanescent Field

Appendix 1: Total Internal Reflection and Evanescent Field

Electromagnetic near fields designate non-radiative fields that are localized near an object, so to say at the surface of the object. Optical near fields offer a convenient way to probe interfaces. They extend over one wavelength or so. In particular they can be used to excite scattering or fluorescence.

One such near field is the evanescent waves present in the medium of lower refractive index at total internal reflection. When reflectivity coefficients are one, there is nonetheless a near field penetrating the medium of lower refractive index. It is well described by the reflectivity coefficients, with r p and r s being complex numbers of module 1 (Fig. 13.4).

Fig. 13.4
figure 4

Optical field at TIR the bottom correspond to the low refractive index medium (wiki-commons). The white line is added to materialize the interface. Below is the medium of low refractive index and above the one with high refractive index. The brightness relates to the amplitude of the electric field (the brighter the higher) The standing waves due to the interference between the incoming and reflected beam is clearly seen. The evanescent field is also clearly visible below the white line. (image wiki-commons)

In particular it is possible to compute the penetration depth.

The evanescent field writes [2] as \( E_{ev} = E_{0} \,e^{ - \kappa z} e^{i(kx - \omega t)} \) with the “penetration wave vector” \( \kappa = 1/d_{p} = \frac{{2\pi n_{1} }}{\lambda }\sqrt {\sin^{2} \theta - \frac{{n_{2}^{2} }}{{n_{1}^{2} }}} \) and the “propagation wave vector” along the interface \( k = \frac{{2\pi n_{1} }}{\lambda }\sin \theta \).

The other may be less appreciated length scale associated with TIR is the Goss Haenchen shift, that describes the lateral shift of the beam [2]. Looking into the reflectivity coefficient, a phase shift appears under TIR, which also depends on the polarization and the incidence angle. This phase shift is the sign of a time (length) associated with the TIR.

The EW produced at TIR can be associated with many different detection schemes [22], ellipsometry, light scattering, fluorescence, Raman, IR, and recently optical rotation.

The critical angle is independent of the polarization for non-birefringent materials, and so is the penetration depth. However the s and p polarized light undergo different phase shift under TIR. The difference of phase shift is what ellipsometry under total internal reflection will measure. The penetration depth can be varied by changing the incidence angle. A larger optical contrast between the two materials will provide a shorter penetration depth, as will larger incidence angles. As an example, the field penetration depth d p at interface between high refractive index incidence medium (n 1 = 2) with water (n 2 = 1.33) can become as low as 60 nm for a wavelength of 532 nm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loppinet, B. (2016). Characterization of Soft Matter at Interfaces by Optical Means. In: Lang, P., Liu, Y. (eds) Soft Matter at Aqueous Interfaces. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 917. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24502-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics