Abstract
One of the critical factors for innovation in Latin America is the shortage of human capital in the firms with technical capacity to adapt, create and transform knowledge into new business opportunities. To solve this issue, in recent years, several countries in the region introduced programs to stimulate the placement of researchers into the firms, within their respective science, technology and innovation (ST&I) policies. This paper stresses such initiatives, focusing on the programs established by Brazil and Chile, countries that presented more systematic efforts in this area. Besides the description of the design and operation of these programs, a comparative analysis is conducted involving a set of indicators related to the following aspects: (a) Demand for program resources; (b) industry distribution of the programs’ companies and; (c) regional distribution of the programs’ companies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In Brazil, the main laws marking this policy are the Innovation Law (10.973, 2004), which proposes the means to stimulate innovation, scientific, and technological research activities in a productive environment and the Wellness Law (11.986, 2005) that creates special tax incentive schemes for technological innovation, for example, the removal of certain tax requirements. Chile introduced the Tax Incentive Law for R&D (20.241, 2008), which allows private firms to reduce their tax obligations by up to 35 % of their R&D resources. This law was amended in 2013 to extend access to this benefit.
- 2.
The case of Mexico can be considered an outlier, given the increase in the rate of researchers employed by firms (from 19.7 % in 2000 to 45.3 % in 2005, and falling to 41.5 % in 2010). This rate surpassed even Spain (33.7 %), Portugal (22.9 %), and Brazil (25.9 %) (RICyT 2013). Dutrénit and Arza (2010, p. 111) stresses that despite such a phenomenon, this has not been reflected in an increase in innovative capacities in the industrial sector; the redistribution of researchers represents one of the most remarkable structural changes in the Mexican innovation system profile in recent years.
- 3.
Luchillo (2009) points out that these data present a significant correlation between master’s degree holders and their employment in the business sector in Mexico. This could explain the increase of the proportion of researchers employed in the business sector in this country during the last decade.
- 4.
To illustrate this phenomenon, in 2000, 1440 postgraduate programs in Brazil (master’s and doctorate) granted by CAPES (Brazilian Council For The Improvement of Third Level Education Programs). In 2010, this number increased to 2840. However, in 2000, CAPES granted 20,470 scholarships for master’s and doctorate degrees; this number more than doubled in 2010 to 54,848 (CAPES 2013). In Chile in 2004, there were 394 master’s degrees and 115 doctorate programs offered by the Universities of the Rectors’ Council. By 2012, these numbers increased to 610 and 171, respectively (Chilean National Educational Council 2012). Similarly for this country, the number of doctorate scholarship recipients under CONICyT (national and foreign) increased from 429 in 2006 to 816 in 2012 (Estadísticas Becas, CONICyT 2013).
- 5.
An established legal entity, at the time of its application, related and led by one or more firms, holdings, entrepreneurs, or a group of entrepreneurs (e.g., professional associations and cooperatives), with its main activities being in R&D and being able to effectively demonstrate technological transfer capacity to the productive sector.
- 6.
It is important to note that this picture refers to the latest data available from the Technological Innovation Survey 2009–2011, and may have changed in recent years. However, this is valid to stress the problem in the context of the demand for public resources for innovation.
- 7.
This measurement is based on a representative sample of 144,141 firms at a national level. According to the survey, 26.9 % of the sample firms have undertaken innovation activities.
- 8.
The southern region of Araucanía presents the highest innovation rate in the country: 30 % of firms conducted some type of innovation project between 2009 and 2010. The Magellan region, in Chilean Patagonia, comes in second with an innovation rate of 26.6 %, followed by the northern Antofagasta region with 26.2 %.
- 9.
The data refer to “other forms of support,” among which are RHAE program scholarships (IBGE 2013).
References
Argentinian National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICeT). (2013). Researchers within firms. http://web.conicet.gov.ar/web/conicet.ciencia.vinculacion/investigadores-en-empresas. Accessed 29 May 2013.
Brazilian Council for Improvement of Higher Education personnel (CAPES). (2013). GEOCAPES Statistical data. http://geocapes.capes.gov.br/geocapesds/#. Accessed 20 May 2013.
Brazilian Federal Government – Strategic and Management Studies Center (CGEE). (2011). RHAE Program Researchers into Firms. Projects Directory, calls #67/2008 and #62/2009. Brazil. http://www.cnpq.br/documents/10157/56ba93de-6cf3-4bf8-9e84-93f76b12f30f. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). (2011). Technological innovation survey 2008. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.pintec.ibge.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=15&Itemid=19. Accessed 20 May 2013.
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). (2013). Techonolgical innovation survey 2011. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.pintec.ibge.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=27&Itemid=43. Accessed 12 Apr 2014.
Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI). (2013). National science, technology and innovation indicators. http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/740.html?execview. Accessed 20 May 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2007). Public call # 32/2007 of RHAE Researchers into Firms program. http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&filtro=encerradas&buscaModo=textual&tmp=1401395344754. Accessed 30 May 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2008a). RHAE Researchers into Firms: Results and project catalogue. Brazil. http://www.cnpq.br/documents/10157/6629d145-d10c-40ca-bacc-faf7a51b0ee5. Accessed 30 Aug 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2008b). Public call # 67/2008 of RHAE Researchers into Firms program. http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&filtro=encerradas&buscaModo=textual&tmp=1401395344754. Accessed 30 May 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2009). Public call #62/2009 of RHAE Researchers into Firms program. http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&filtro=encerradas&buscaModo=textual&tmp=1401395344754. Accessed 30 May 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2010). Public call #75/2010 of RHAE Researchers into Firms program. http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&filtro=encerradas&buscaModo=textual&tmp=1401395344754. Accessed 30 May 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2012). Public call #17/2012 of RHAE Researchers into Firms program. http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&filtro=encerradas&buscaModo=textual&tmp=1401395344754. Accessed 30 May 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2013a). Impact assessment of RHAE Researchers into Firms program. Brazil.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2013b). RHAE numbers. http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/blog/-/blogs/numeros-do-rhae?_33_redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnpq.br%2Fweb%2Fguest%2Fblog%3Fp_p_id%3D33%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn-3%26p_p_col_pos%3D1%26p_p_col_count%3D2. Accessed 23 Aug 2013.
Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). (2013c). RHAE Researchers into firms: Results and project catalogue. Brazil. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2_zuiazbQCKQ0ZMczM5dldtNWs/edit. Accessed 30 Aug 2013.
Chilean Government. (2012). 7th Innovation Survey (2009–2010). Ministry of Economy. http://www.economia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Presentaci%C3%B3n-Resultados-7ma-Encuesta-de-Innovacion.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2013.
Chilean Government. (2014). 8th Innovation Survey (2011–2012). Ministry of Economy. http://www.economia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Presentacion-Resultados-8va-Encuesta-Innovacion.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2014.
Chilean National Committee for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICyT). (2009). Attraction and placement of advanced human capital (PAI): Researchers into productive sector program. 2009 Contest. http://www.conicyt.cl/pai/2009/05/18/concurso-nacional-de-insercion-de-capital-humano-avanzado-en-el-sector-productivo-chileno-extiende-plazo-al-250809-a-las-1600-hrs/. Accessed 30 Jun 2013.
Chilean National Committee for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICyT). (2010). Attraction and placement of advanced human capital (PAI): Researchers into productive sector program. 2010 Contest. http://www.conicyt.cl/pai/2010/04/12/concurso-nacional-de-insercion-de-capital-humano-avanzado-en-el-sector-productivo-chileno-convocatoria-2010/. Accessed 30 Jun 2013.
Chilean National Committee for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICyT). (2011). Attraction and placement of advanced human capital (PAI): Researchers into productive sector program. 2011 Contest. http://www.conicyt.cl/pai/2011/05/09/concurso-de-insercion-de-capital-humano-avanzado-en-el-sector-productivo-chileno-segunda-convocatoria-2011/. Accessed 30 Jun 2013.
Chilean National Committee for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICyT). (2012a). Statistical summary 2008–2012. Santiago, Chile.
Chilean National Committee for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICyT). (2012b). Attraction and placement of advanced human capital (PAI): Researchers into productive sector program. 2012 Contest. http://www.conicyt.cl/pai/2012/02/29/concurso-de-insercion-de-capital-humano-avanzado-en-el-sector-productivo-chileno-convocatoria-2012/. Accessed 30 Jun 2013.
Chilean National Committee for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICyT). (2013). Scholars statistics. http://www.conicyt.cl/becas-conicyt/estadisticas/informacion-general/. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.
Chilean National Educational Council. (2012). Indexes: statistics and databases. http://www.cned.cl/public/Secciones/SeccionIndicesEstadisticas/indices_estadisticas_posgrado.aspx. Accessed 20 June 2013.
Colombian Administrative Department for Science, technology and innovation (Colciencias). (2011). Application call to encourage Colombian and foreign doctorate holders placement into Colombian firms, 2011. http://www.colciencias.gov.co/convocatoria/convocatoria-para-estimular-la-inserci-n-de-doctores-colombianos-y-del-extranjero-las-e. Accessed 6 July 2013.
Dutrénit, G., & Arza, V. (2010). Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organizations and industry: Comparing four Latin American countries. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 541–553.
Iberoamerican and interamerican Science and Technology Indicator Network (RICyT). (2013). Indicators: Higher education graduates. http://www.ricyt.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=149&Itemid=3. Accessed 20 May 2013.
Luchillo, L. (2009). Impacts of Mexican CONACyT scholarship grants program: An analysis on the careers of former scholarship owners (1997–2006). Iberoamerican Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 5(13), 175–205.
Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT). (2013). Scientific and technological indicators. http://www.siicyt.gob.mx/siicyt/cms/paginas/IndCientifTec.jsp. Accessed 20 Aug 2013.
Organization for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD). (2012). Main science and technology indicators 2011/2012. http://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm. Accessed 20 May 2013.
Schoenecker, T., Daellenbach, U., & McCarthy, A. M. (1995). Factors affecting a firm’s commitment to innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 52–56.
Souitaris, V. (2002). Firm-specific Competencies determining technological innovation: A survey in Greece. R&D Management, 32, 61–77.
Velho, L. (2007). The role of the formation of researchers within innovation system. Science and Culture, 59(4), 23–28.
Viotti, E. B. (2010). Doctorate holders 2010: Demographic studies of Brazilian technical and scientific staff. In: Brazilian Government – Strategic and Management Studies Center (CGEE), Doctorate holders 2010: Demographic studies of Brazilian technical and scientific staff (pp. 15–50).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gutiérrez, E.A.A., Couto e Silva Neto, F. (2016). Promoting Research Careers in the Business Sector: Assessing Public Policy Instruments in Brazil and Chile. In: Horta, H., Heitor, M., Salmi, J. (eds) Trends and Challenges in Science and Higher Education. Knowledge Studies in Higher Education, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20964-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20964-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20963-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20964-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)