Abstract
We make use of an effective field-theoretical approach to derive post-Newtonian equations of motion of hydrodynamical inhomogeneities in cosmology. The matter Lagrangian for the perturbed cosmological model includes dark matter, dark energy, and ordinary baryonic matter. The Lagrangian is expanded in an asymptotic Taylor series around a Friedmann-LemeƮtre-Robertson-Walker background. The small parameter of the decomposition is the magnitude of the metric tensor perturbation. Each term of the expansion series is gauge-invariant and all of them together form a basis for the successive post-Newtonian approximations around the background metric. The approximation scheme is covariant and the asymptotic nature of the Lagrangian decomposition does not require the post-Newtonian perturbations to be small though computationally it works the most effectively when the perturbed metric is close enough to the background metric. Temporal evolution of the background metric is governed by dark matter and dark energy and we associate the large-scale inhomogeneities of matter as those generated by the primordial cosmological perturbations in these two components with \(\delta \rho /\rho \le 1\). The small scale inhomogeneities are generated by the baryonic matter which is considered as a bare perturbation of the background gravitational field, dark matter and energy. Mathematically, the large scale structure inhomogeneities are given by the homogeneous solution of the post-Newtonian equations while the small scale inhomogeneities are described by a particular solution of these equations with the stress-energy tensor of the baryonic matter that admits \(\delta \rho /\rho \gg 1\). We explicitly work out the field equations of the first post-Newtonian approximation in cosmology and derive the post-Newtonian equations of motion of the large and small scale inhomogeneities which generalize the covariant law of conservation of stress-energy-momentum tensor of matter in asymptotically-flat spacetime.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The fact that \({\mathcal F}\) is a scalar density is essential for the transformation of covariant derivatives to the total divergence. The total divergences can be converted to surface integrals which vanish on the boundary of integration and, hence, can be dropped off the calculations.
References
O.V. Verkhodanov, A.G. Doroshkevich, Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy, chapter Cosmic Microwave Background Mapping (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2012), pp. 133ā159
J. Peacock, Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics, chapter Cosmology: Standard Model (2002)
V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005), p. 442
S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008)
D.S. Gorbunov, V.A. Rubakov, Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe (World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore, Hackensack, 2011)
M. Tegmark, M.A. Strauss, M.R. Blanton, K. Abazajian, S. Dodelson, H. Sandvik, X. Wang, D.H. Weinberg, I. Zehavi, N.A. Bahcall, F. Hoyle, D. Schlegel, R. Scoccimarro, M.S. Vogeley, A. Berlind, T. Budavari, A. Connolly, D.J. Eisenstein, D. Finkbeiner, J.A. Frieman, J.E. Gunn, L. Hui, B. Jain, D. Johnston, S. Kent, H. Lin, R. Nakajima, R.C. Nichol, J.P. Ostriker, A. Pope, R. Scranton, U. Seljak, R.K. Sheth, A. Stebbins, A.S. Szalay, I. Szapudi, Y. Xu, J. Annis, J. Brinkmann, S. Burles, F.J. Castander, I. Csabai, J. Loveday, M. Doi, M. Fukugita, B. Gillespie, G. Hennessy, D.W. Hogg, Ž. IveziÄ, G.R. Knapp, D.Q. Lamb, B.C. Lee, R.H. Lupton, T.A. McKay, P. Kunszt, J.A. Munn, L. OāConnell, J. Peoples, J.R. Pier, M. Richmond, C. Rockosi, D.P. Schneider, C. Stoughton, D.L. Tucker, D.E. vanden Berk, B. Yanny, D.G. York, Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP. Phys. Rev. D 69(10), 103501 (2004)
Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A.J. Planck Banday et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, ArXiv e-prints, March 2013
Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A.J. Planck Banday et al., Planck 2013 results. XXIV. Constraints on primordial non-gaussianity, ArXiv e-prints, March 2013
J.-L. Lehners, P.J. Steinhardt, Planck 2013 results support the cyclic universe. Phys. Rev. D 87(12), 123533 (2013)
A.R. Liddle, D.H. Lyth, Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)
A. KrasiÅski, C. Hellaby, Structure formation in the LemaĆ®tre-Tolman model. Phys. Rev. D 65(2), 023501 (2002)
A. KrasiÅski, C. Hellaby, Formation of a galaxy with a central black hole in the LemaĆ®tre-Tolman model. Phys. Rev. D 69(4), 043502 (2004)
P. Jacewicz, A. KrasiÅski, Formation of Gyrs old black holes in the centers of galaxies within the LemaĆ®tre-Tolman model. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 81ā105 (2012)
V.A. Fock, The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964)
A. Papapetrou, Equations of motion in general relativity. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 64, 57ā75 (1951)
S. Chandrasekhar, Y. Nutku, The second post-Newtonian equations of hydrodynamics in general relativity. Astrophys. J. 158, 55 (1969)
S. Chandrasekhar, F.P. Esposito, The 2\(\frac{1}{2}\)-post-Newtonian equations of hydrodynamics and radiation reaction in general relativity. Astrophys. J. 160, 153 (1970)
J.L. Anderson, T.C. Decanio, Equations of hydrodynamics in general relativity in the slow motion approximation. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 6, 197ā237 (1975)
N. Spyrou, Relativistic celestial mechanics of binary stars. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 13, 473ā485 (1981)
S.M. Kopeikin, General relativistic equations of binary motion for extended bodies with conservative corrections and radiation damping. Sov. Astron. 29, 516ā524 (1985)
R.A. Breuer, E. Rudolph, The force law for the dynamic two-body problem in the second post-Newtonian approximation of general relativity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 14, 181ā211 (1982)
R.A. Breuer, E. Rudolph, Radiation reaction and energy loss in the post-Newtonian approximation of general relativity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 13, 777ā793 (1981)
S.T. Shapiro, A.P. Lightman, Rapidly rotating, post-Newtonian neutron stars. Astrophys. J. 207, 263ā278 (1976)
I. Ciufolini, R. Ruffini, Equilibrium configurations of neutron stars and the parametrized post-Newtonian metric theories of gravitation. Astrophys. J. 275, 867ā877 (1983)
S.L. Shapiro, S. Zane, Bar mode instability in relativistic rotating stars: A post-Newtonian treatment. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 117, 531 (1998)
M. Takada, T. Futamase, A post-Newtonian Lagrangian perturbation approach to large-scale structure formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 306, 64ā88 (1999)
W. Petry, Cosmological post-Newtonian approximation in flat space-time theory of gravitation. Astrophys. Space Sci. 272(4), 353ā368 (2000)
P. Szekeres, T. Rainsford, Post-newtonian cosmology. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 32, 479ā490 (2000)
J.-C. Hwang, H. Noh, D. Puetzfeld, Cosmological non-linear hydrodynamics with post-Newtonian corrections. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 3, 10 (2008)
T.A. Oliynyk, Cosmological post-Newtonian expansions to arbitrary order. Commun. Math. Phys. 295, 431ā463 (2010)
T.A. Oliynyk, The fast Newtonian limit for perfect fluids. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16(2), 359ā391 (2012)
S.M. Kopeikin, The speed of gravity in general relativity and theoretical interpretation of the Jovian deflection experiment. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 3251ā3286 (2004)
J.L. Anderson, R.E. Kates, L.S. Kegeles, R.G. Madonna, Divergent integrals of post-Newtonian gravity: nonanalytic terms in the near-zone expansion of a gravitationally radiating system found by matching. Phys. Rev. D 25, 2038ā2048 (1982)
L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian gravitational radiation, in Einsteinās Field Equations and Their Physical Implications. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 540, ed. by B.G. Schmidt (Springer, Berlin, 2000), p. 225
G. SchƤfer, Post-Newtonian methods: analytic results on the binary problem. In: L. Blanchet, A. Spallicci and B. Whiting (Eds.), Mass and Motion in General Relativity. Fundam. Theor. Phys. 162, 167ā210 (2011)
T. Buchert, Dark energy from structure: a status report. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 467ā527 (2008)
E.W. Kolb, V. Marra, S. Matarrese, Description of our cosmological spacetime as a perturbed conformal Newtonian metric and implications for the backreaction proposal for the accelerating universe. Phys. Rev. D 78(10), 103002 (2008)
E.W. Kolb, V. Marra, S. Matarrese, Cosmological background solutions and cosmological backreactions. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 42, 1399ā1412 (2010)
Stephen R. Green, Robert M. Wald, New framework for analyzing the effects of small scale inhomogeneities in cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 83, 084020 (2011)
S.R. Green, R.M. Wald, Newtonian and relativistic cosmologies. Phys. Rev. D 85(6), 063512 (2012)
A.G. Riess, A.V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, A. Diercks, P.M. Garnavich, R.L. Gilliland, C.J. Hogan, S. Jha, R.P. Kirshner, B. Leibundgut, M.M. Phillips, D. Reiss, B.P. Schmidt, R.A. Schommer, R.C. Smith, J. Spyromilio, C. Stubbs, N.B. Suntzeff, J. Tonry, Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009ā1038 (1998)
S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R.A. Knop, P. Nugent, P.G. Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. Goobar, D.E. Groom, I.M. Hook, A.G. Kim, M.Y. Kim, J.C. Lee, N.J. Nunes, R. Pain, C.R. Pennypacker, R. Quimby, C. Lidman, R.S. Ellis, M. Irwin, R.G. McMahon, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, N. Walton, B. Schaefer, B.J. Boyle, A.V. Filippenko, T. Matheson, A.S. Fruchter, N. Panagia, H.J.M. Newberg, W.J. Couch and Supernova Cosmology Project, Measurements of omega and lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565ā586 (1999)
R. Zalaletdinov, The averaging problem in cosmology and macroscopic gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 1173ā1181 (2008)
T. Futamase, Averaging of a locally inhomogeneous realistic universe. Phys. Rev. D 53, 681ā689 (1996)
C. Clarkson, G. Ellis, J. Larena, O. Umeh, Does the growth of structure affect our dynamical models of the universe? The averaging, backreaction and fitting problems in cosmology. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 112901 (2011)
S. Kopeikin, M. Efroimsky, G. Kaplan, Relativistic Celestial Mechanics of the Solar System (Wiley, Weinheim, 2011)
G.F.R. Ellis, Inhomogeneity effects in cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 28(16), 164001 (2011)
S.M. Kopeikin, A.N. Petrov, Post-Newtonian celestial dynamics in cosmology: field equations. Phys. Rev. D 87(4), 044029 (2013)
E.M. Lifshitz, I.M. Khalatnikov, Special issue: problems of relativistic cosmology. Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 6, 495ā522 (1964)
E. Lifshitz, On the gravitational stability of the expanding universe. JETP 10, 116ā129 (1946). http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai
S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Wiley, New York, 1972)
J.M. Bardeen, Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations. Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882ā1905 (1980)
H. Kodama, M. Sasaki, Cosmological perturbation theory. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78, 1 (1984)
A. Ishibashi, R.M. Wald, Can the acceleration of our universe be explained by the effects of inhomogeneities? Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 235ā250 (2006)
R. Baierlein, Representing a vector field: Helmholtzās theorem derived from a Fourier identity. Am. J. Phys. 63, 180ā182 (1995)
V.A. Brumberg, Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1991), p. 271
G.F.R. Ellis, M. Bruni, Covariant and gauge-invariant approach to cosmological density fluctuations. Phys. Rev. D 40, 1804ā1818 (1989)
G.F.R. Ellis, J. Hwang, M. Bruni, Covariant and gauge-independent perfect-fluid Robertson-Walker perturbations. Phys. Rev. D 40, 1819ā1826 (1989)
C.G. Tsagas, A. Challinor, R. Maartens, Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure. Phys. Rep. 465, 61ā147 (2008)
S. Shandarin, S. Habib, K. Heitmann, Cosmic web, multistream flows, and tessellations. Phys. Rev. D 85(8), 083005 (2012)
W. Del Pozzo, Inference of cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: Applications to second generation interferometers. Phys. Rev. D 86(4), 043011 (2012)
S.R. Taylor, J.R. Gair, I. Mandel, Cosmology using advanced gravitational-wave detectors alone. Phys. Rev. D 85(2), 023535 (2012)
M. Kramer, N. Wex, The double pulsar system: a unique laboratory for gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 26(7), 073001 (2009)
J.M. Weisberg, D.J. Nice, J.H. Taylor, Timing measurements of the relativistic binary pulsar PSR B1913+16. Astrophys. J. 722, 1030ā1034 (2010)
M. Kramer, Pulsars, SKA and time-domain studies in the future, in IAU Symposium, ed. by E. Griffin, R. Hanisch, R. Seaman, vol. 285, pp. 147ā152, April 2012
S.M. Kopeikin, Celestial ephemerides in an expanding universe. Phys. Rev. D 86(6), 064004 (2012)
S. Hojman, Problem of the identical vanishing of Euler-Lagrange derivatives in field theory. Phys. Rev. D 27, 451ā453 (1983)
N.V. Mitskevich, Physical Fields in General Relativity (Nauka, Moscow, 1969), p. 326
W. Greiner, J. Reinhardt, Field Quantization (Springer, Berlin, 1996). Translated from the German. With a foreword by D.A. Bromley
A.D. Popova, A.N. Petrov, Exact dynamic theories on a given background in gravitation. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3, 2651ā2679 (1988)
B. Schutz, Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980)
A.N. Petrov, NÅther and Belinfante corrected types of currents for perturbations in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 28(21), 215021 (2011)
L.P. Grishchuk, A.N. Petrov, A.D. Popova, Exact theory of the (Einstein) gravitational field in an arbitrary background space-time. Commun. Math. Phys. 94, 379ā396 (1984)
C.M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993), p. 396
E. Bertschinger, Testing dark matter models with the phase space structure of dark matter halos, in Probes of Dark Matter on Galaxy Scales, p. 10001 (2013)
I. Zlatev, L. Wang, P.J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 896ā899 (1999)
B.F. Schutz, Perfect fluids in general relativity: velocity potentials and a variational principle. Phys. Rev. D 2, 2762ā2773 (1970)
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1959)
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975)
L. Amendola, S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)
Acknowledgments
Sergei Kopeikin thanks the Center of Applied Space Technology and Microgravity (ZARM) of the University of Bremen for providing partial financial support for travel and Physikzentrum at Bad Honnef (Germany) for hospitality and accommodation. The work of Sergei Kopeikin has been supported by the grant 14-27-00068 of the Russian Scientific foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Hilbert and Einstein Lagrangians
We define the Christoffel symbols of the second kind as usual [46]
The Christoffel symbols of the first type
We notice the symmetry with respect to the last two indices \(\Gamma _{\alpha \beta \gamma }=\Gamma _{\alpha (\beta \gamma )}\). There is no any symmetry with respect to the first two indices. In general,
where
There are two, particularly useful symbols that are obtained by contracting indices of the Christoffel symbols of the first kind. They are denoted as
and
Direct inspection shows that
The two symbols are interrelated
We define the Riemann tensor as follows [46]
Second covariant derivatives of tensors do not commute due to the curvature of spacetime. For example, denoting the covariant derivatives with a vertical bar we have for a covector field \({\mathcal F}_\alpha \) and a covariant tensor of second rank, \({\mathcal F}_{\alpha \beta }\) the following commutation relations
Riemann tensor can be also expressed in terms of the second partial derivatives of the metric tensor and the Christoffel symbols
Contraction of two indices in the Riemann tensor yields the Ricci tensor
or, in terms of the second derivatives from the metric tensor and the Christoffel symbols,
One more contraction of indices in the Ricci tensor brings about the Ricci scalar which we shall write down in the form suggested by Fock [14, Appendix B]
where
is (upĀ to a constant factor) the gravitational Lagrangian introduced by Einstein [79] as an alternative to the gravitational Lagrangian, R, of Hilbert. The Hilbert Lagrangian is the Ricci scalar which depends on the second derivatives of the metric tensor while the Einstein Lagrangian does not.
The two Lagrangians are interrelated
where
is a vector density of weight \(+1\). After performing differentiation in (278), and accounting for (265) we can easily prove that (278) reproduces (276).
One more form of relation between R and L will be useful for calculating the variational derivative in Appendix section āVariational Derivative from the Hilbert Lagrangianā. To this end we introduce a new notation
and notice that
EquationsĀ (280), (281) allows us to cast (276) to the following form
that was found by Fock [14, Appendix B].
Appendix 2: Variational Derivatives
1.1 Variational Derivative from the Hilbert Lagrangian
The goal of this section is to prove relation (45) being valid on the background manifold \({\bar{{\mathcal M}}}\). We shall omit the bar over the background geometric objects as it does not bring about confusion. We notice that the Hilbert Lagrangian density, \({{\mathcal L}}^\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle G}=-(16\pi )^{-1}\sqrt{-g}R\), differs from \({{\mathcal L}}^\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle E}=-(16\pi )^{-1}\sqrt{-g}L\) by a total derivative that is a consequence of (278). Due to relation (9) the Lagrangian derivatives from \({{\mathcal L}}^\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle G}\) and \({{\mathcal L}}^\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle E}\) coincides
thus, pointing out that we can safely operate with the Einstein Lagrangian density \({{\mathcal L}}^\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle E}\). Because of (35), we have
which suggests that calculation of the variational derivative with respect to the metric tensor is sufficient.
Calculation of the variational derivative \(\delta {{\mathcal L}}^\mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle E}/\delta g^{\rho \sigma }\) demands the partial derivatives of the contravariant metric and Christoffel symbols with respect to \(g^{\mu \nu }\). The partial derivatives of the metric are calculated with the help of (37), (30). The Christoffel symbols are given in terms of the partial derivatives from covariant metric tensor, \(g_{\alpha \beta ,\gamma }\) which are not conjugated with the dynamic variable \(g^{\alpha \beta }\). Thus, calculation of the partial derivative with respect to \(g^{\mu \nu }\) from the Christoffel symbols demands its transformation to the form where the conjugated variables \(g^{\alpha \beta }{}_{,\gamma }\) are used instead. This form of the Christoffel symbols is
Taking the partial derivative of (285) with respect to the contravariant metric yields
and
where we have used (263). Contracting (286), (287) with the Christoffel symbols and the metric tensor results in
Partial derivatives of the Christoffel symbols with respect to the metric derivatives are calculated from (285) with the help of (38). We get
Contracting (291), (292) with the Christoffel symbols and the metric tensor resultsĀ in
Explicit expression for the variational derivative of the Einstein Lagrangian is
Replacing the partial derivatives in (296) with the corresponding right sides of Eqs.Ā (37), (30), (293)ā(295) and taking the partial derivative with respect to spatial coordinates, yields
where we have used expressions (274), (276) for the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar respectively. Substituting Eq.Ā (297) to (284) yields
1.2 Variational Derivatives of Dynamic Variables with Respect to the Metric Tensor
1.2.1 Variational Derivatives of Dark Matter Variables
The primary thermodynamic variable of dark matter is \(\mu _\mathrm{m}\) defined in (125). Variational derivative from \(\mu _\mathrm{m}\) is calculated directly from its definition and yields
Variational derivative of pressure \(\bar{p}_\mathrm{m}\) is obtained from thermodynamic relation (121a) by making use of the chain differentiation rule along with (299), that is
Variational derivative of the rest mass and energy density are obtained by making use of (299) along with equation of state that allows us to express partial derivatives of \(\rho _\mathrm{m}\) and \(\epsilon _\mathrm{m}\) in terms of the variational derivative for \(\mu _\mathrm{m}\). More specifically,
where the speed of sound appears explicitly. Variational derivatives from products and/or ratios of the thermodynamic quantities are calculated my applying the chain rule of differentiation and the above equations,
1.2.2 Variational Derivatives of Dark Energy Variables
The primary thermodynamic variable of dark energy is \({\bar{\mu }}_\mathrm{q}\) defined in (125). Variational derivative from \({\bar{\mu }}_\mathrm{q}\) is calculated directly from its definition,
Variational derivative of the mass density \(\bar{\rho }_\mathrm{q}\) of the dark energy āfluidā follows directly from \(\bar{\rho }_\mathrm{q}={\bar{\mu }}_\mathrm{q}\), and reads
Variational derivative of pressure \(\bar{p}_\mathrm{q}\) is obtained from definition (138) along with (306), which yields
Variational derivative of energy density \({\bar{\epsilon }}_\mathrm{q}\) is obtained by making use of (306) along with (137). More specifically,
Variational derivatives from products and ratios of other quantities are calculated my making use of the chain rule of differentiation and the above equations
1.2.3 Variational Derivatives of Four-Velocity of the Hubble Flow
Variational derivatives from four-velocity of the fluid are derived from the definition (163) of the four-velocity given in terms of the potential \(\bar{\Phi }\) or \({\bar{\Psi }}\) which are independent dynamic variables that do not depend on the metric tensor. Taking variational derivative from (163) and making use either (299) or (306) we obtain
where Eq.Ā (315) accounts for the fact that \(\phi _\alpha \) is an independent variable that does not depend on the metric tensor.
1.2.4 Variational Derivatives of the Metric Tensor Perturbations
Variational derivatives from the metric tensor perturbations \(l^{\alpha \beta }\) are determined by taking into account that \(l^{\alpha \beta }=\mathfrak {h}^{\alpha \beta }/\sqrt{\bar{g}}\) and \(\mathfrak {h}^{\alpha \beta }\) is an independent dynamic variable which does not depend on the metric tensor. Therefore, its variational derivative is nil, and we have
Other variational derivatives are derived by making use of tensor operations of rising and lowering indices with the help of \(\bar{g}_{\alpha \beta }\) and applying from (316). It gives
1.3 Variational Derivatives with Respect to Matter Variables
1.3.1 Variational Derivatives of Dark Matter Variables
The dark matter variables do not depend on the Clebsch potential \(\bar{\Phi }\) directly but merely on its first derivative \(\bar{\Phi }_\alpha \). Therefore, any variational derivative of dark matter variable, say, \(\mathcal{Q}=\mathcal{Q}(\bar{\Phi }_\alpha )\), is reduced to a total divergence
We present a short summary of the partial derivatives with respect to \(\bar{\Phi }_\alpha \).
Partial derivatives of four velocity
It allows us to deduce, for example,
1.3.2 Variational Derivatives of Dark Energy Variables
The dark energy variables depend on both the scalar potential \({\bar{\Psi }}\) and its first derivative \({\bar{\Psi }}_\alpha \) in the most generic situation. This is because there is a potential of the scalar field \(W(\bar{\Phi })\) that is absent in case of the dark matter. Therefore, variational derivative of the dark energy variable, say, \(\mathcal{a}=\mathcal{A}({\bar{\Psi }},{\bar{\Psi }}_\alpha )\), is
Partial derivatives \(\partial \mathcal{A}/\partial {\bar{\Psi }}=(\partial \mathcal{A}/\partial W)(\partial W/\partial {\bar{\Psi }}\), and their particular form depends on the shape of the potential W. As for the partial derivatives with respect to the derivatives of the field, they can be calculated explicitly for each variable, and we present a short summary of these partial derivatives below. More specifically,
Partial derivatives of four velocity
It allows us to deduce, for example,
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kopeikin, S.M., Petrov, A.N. (2015). Equations of Motion in an Expanding Universe. In: Puetzfeld, D., LƤmmerzahl, C., Schutz, B. (eds) Equations of Motion in Relativistic Gravity. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 179. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18335-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18335-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18334-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18335-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)