Abstract
Solid adsorbents are promising for applications in post-combustion CO2 capture scenarios. Some adsorbents include zeolites, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, zeolites, and silicon-based adsorbents. The materials are characterized by their surface functional groups, porosity, surface area, pore size, metal ligands, and electrostatic interactions to determine their potential as adsorbents for CO2. Organic adsorbents are promising for low temperature CO2 adsorption because of their surface properties, such as high surface area, which enables it to be modified by adding additional metals and functional groups. Carbonaceous materials can be physically or chemically activated in order to enhance capture. Biochar, a material known for its benefits to agriculture, can also be used to capture CO2. Modified Organic Frameworks (MOFs) combine metal ions and organic ligands to produce a crystalline porous network that is capable of selectively binding molecules at high capacity. Other solid adsorbents include zeolites, clays, silica-based adsorbents, and metal oxide-based adsorbents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bae YS, Hauser BG, Farha OK, Hupp JT, Snurr RQ (2011) Enhancement of CO2/CH4 selectivity in metal-organic frameworks containing lithium cations. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 141(1–3):231–235
Banerjee R, Phan A, Wang B, Knobler C, Furukawa H, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2008) High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science 319(5865):939–943
Barrow CJ (2012) Biochar: potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Appl Geogr 34:21–28
Bastin L, Barcia PS, Hurtado EJ, Silva JAC, Rodrigues AE, Chen BL (2008) A microporous metal-organic framework for separation of CO2/N-2 and CO2/CH4 by fixed-bed adsorption. J Phys Chem C 112(5):1575–1581
Brasquet C, Rousseau B, Estrade-Szwarckopf H, Le Cloirec P (2000) Observation of activated carbon fibers with SEM and AFM correlation with adsorption data in aqueous solution. Carbon 38(3):407–422
Casco ME, Martinez-Escandell M, Silvestre-Albero J, Rodriguez-Reinoso F (2014) Effect of the porous structure in carbon materials for CO2 capture at atmospheric and high-pressure. Carbon 67:230–235
Chang YC, Chen DH (2006) Recovery of gold(III) ions by a chitosan-coated magnetic nano-adsorbent. Gold Bull 39(3):98–102
Che SN, Lund K, Tatsumi T, Iijima S, Joo SH, Ryoo R, Terasaki O (2003) Direct observation of 3D mesoporous structure by scanning electron microscopy (SEM): SBA-15 silica and CMK-5 carbon. Angew Chem Int Ed 42(19):2182–2185
Creamer AE, Gao B, Zhang M (2014) Carbon dioxide capture using biochar produced from sugarcane bagasse and hickory wood. Chem Eng J 249:174–179
D’alessandro DM, Smit B, Long JR (2010) Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 49(35):6058–6082
Dogan AU, Dogan M, Onal M, Sarikaya Y, Aburub A, Wurster DE (2006) Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: specific surface area by the brunauer emmett teller (BET) method. Clays Clay Miner 54(1):62–66
Drage TC, Blackman JM, Pevida C, Snape CE (2009) Evaluation of activated carbon adsorbents for CO2 capture in gasification. Energy Fuels 23:2790–2796
Glaser B, Parr M, Braun C, Kopolo G (2009) Biochar is carbon negative. Nat Geosci 2(1):2–2
Goh KH, Lim TT, Dong Z (2008) Application of layered double hydroxides for removal of oxyanions: a review. Water Res 42(6–7):1343–1368
Hicks JC, Drese JH, Fauth DJ, Gray ML, Qi GG, Jones CW (2008) Designing adsorbents for CO(2) capture from flue gas-hyperbranched aminosilicas capable of capturing CO(2) reversibly. J Am Chem Soc 130(10):2902–2903
Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144(1):175–187
Lee JW, Kidder M, Evans BR, Paik S, Buchanan AC, Garten CT, Brown RC (2010) Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment. Environ Sci Technol 44(20):7970–7974
Li J (2011) Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord Chem Rev 255:1791–1823
Li JR, Ma YG, McCarthy MC, Sculley J, Yu JM, Jeong HK, Balbuena PB, Zhou HC (2011) Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord Chem Rev 255(15–16):1791–1823
Li ZS, Cai NS, Huang YY, Han HJ (2005) Synthesis, experimental studies, and analysis of a new calcium-based carbon dioxide absorbent. Energy Fuels 19(4):1447–1452
Liu J (2012) Progress in adsorption-based CO2 capture by metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 41:2308–2322
Lowell S, Shields JE (1991) Powder surface area and porosity, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London
Lu CY, Bai HL, Wu BL, Su FS, Fen-Hwang J (2008) Comparative study of CO2 capture by carbon nanotubes, activated carbons, and zeolites. Energy Fuels 22(5):3050–3056
Lu H, Reddy EP, Smirniotis PG (2006) Calcium oxide based sorbents for capture of carbon dioxide at high temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(11):3944–3949
Matovic D (2011) Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: global and Canadian perspective. Energy 36(4):2011–2016
Phan A, Doonan CJ, Uribe-Romo FJ, Knobler CB, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2010) Synthesis, structure, and carbon dioxide capture properties of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Acc Chem Res 43(1):58–67
Pires J, de Carvalho MB, Carvalho AP, Guil JM, Perdigon-Melon JA (2000) Heats of adsorption of N-hexane by thermal gravimetry with differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC): a tool for textural characterization of pillared clays. Clays Clay Miner 48(3):385–391
Reddy MKR, Xu ZP, Lu GQ, da Costa JCD (2006) Layered double hydroxides for CO2 capture: structure evolution and regeneration. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(22):7504–7509
Samanta A, Zhao A, Shimizu GKH, Sarkar P, Gupta R (2012) Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(4):1438–1463
Schneemann A, Bon V, Schwedler I, Senkovska I, Kaskel S, Fischer RA (2014) Flexible metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 43(16):6062–6096
Sevilla M (2011) Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture. Energy Environ Sci 4:1765–1771
Sumida K, Rogow DL, Mason JA, McDonald TM, Bloch ED, Herm ZR, Bae TH, Long JR (2012) Carbon dioxide capture in metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112(2):724–781
Sun YN, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang JN, Zhang M, Zhou YM, Chen H, Yang LY (2014) Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem Eng J 240:574–578
Tenenbaum DJ (2009) Biochar: carbon mitigation from the ground up. Environ Health Perspect 117(2):A70–A73
Yazaydin AO, Snurr RQ, Park TH, Koh K, Liu J, LeVan MD, Benin AI, Jakubczak P, Lanuza M, Galloway DB, Low JJ, Willis RR (2009) Screening of metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. J Am Chem Soc 131(51):18198
Zaman M, Lee JH (2013) Carbon capture from stationary power generation sources: a review of the current status of the technologies. Korean J Chem Eng 30(8):1497–1526
Zelenak V, Halamova D, Gaberova L, Bloch E, Llewellyn P (2008) Amine-modified SBA-12 mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture: effect of amine basicity on sorption properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 116(1–3):358–364
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Creamer, A.E., Gao, B. (2015). Adsorbents for CO2 Capture. In: Carbon Dioxide Capture: An Effective Way to Combat Global Warming. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17010-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17010-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17009-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17010-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)