Skip to main content

Female-Female Strategies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 107 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. W. (2013). Social exclusion: More important to human females than males. PloS One, 8, e55851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbank, V. K. (1987). Female aggression in cross-cultural perspective. Behavior Science Research, 21, 70–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women’s intra-sexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 16–26. doi:10.1080/00224490409552210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2013). The evolutionary psychology of women’s aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 368. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 236, 339–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour, 77, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebensperger, L. A., Rivera, D. S., & Hayes, L. D. (2012). Direct fitness of group living mammals varies with breeding strategy, climate and fitness estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81(4), 1013–1023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L. (2013). Women’s intrasexual competition. In M. Fisher, J. Garcia, & R. Chang (Eds.), Evolution’s empress: Darwinian perspectives on the nature of women (pp. 19–42). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2011). Four strategies used during intrasexual competition for mates. Personal Relationships, 18, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., Cox, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). Deciding between competition derogation and self-promotion. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, N. (in press). Informational warfare: Coalitional gossiping as a strategy for within-group aggression. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook on women and competition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, L. A. (1991). Contest and scramble competition: Patterns of female aggression and ranging behavior among primates. Behavioral Ecology, 2(2), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R. (2013). Cooperation and conflict between women in the family. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 251–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowska, U. M., Ellison, P. T., Galbarczyk, A., Milkowska, K., Pawlowski, B., Thune, I., & Jasienska, G. (2016). Lack of support for relation between women’s masculinity preference, estradiol level and mating context. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2002). A meta-analysis of sex differences in romantic attraction: Do rating contexts moderate tactic effectiveness judgments? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 387–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2014). The evolution of culturally-variable sex differences: Men and women are not always different, but when they are…it appears not to result from patriarchy or sex role socialization. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 221–256). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D., & Buss, D. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and content effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1185–1204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley, P., & Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2011). Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 86(2), 341–366. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00149.X

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, B. I. (2011). Cooperation and competition in a cliff-dwelling people. PNAS, 108, 10894–10901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S., & Crawford, C. B. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryanne L. Fisher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fisher, M.L. (2016). Female-Female Strategies. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_81-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_81-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics