Abstract
In the context of the current Eurozone crisis, the study of the effects of uncertainty in the macrodynamics of employment is a topic of major importance. This paper tackles this challenging question. At a first step a non-ideal relay hysteresis type microeconomic model of employment adjustment with uncertainty is presented. Then, an aggregation mechanism is explicitly considered in order to analyse the aggregate level of employment. Finally, as a new feature, uncertainty is considered endogenously determined by the actual state of the economy. Aggregate time-series built from micro monthly data on a representative sample of Portuguese manufacturing firms is used on a computational implementation of the linear play model of hysteresis. Results illustrate that uncertainty enhances the hysteretic behaviour of employment in small firms, but this effect is not significant for large ones.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
See [17].
- 5.
We follow [8].
- 6.
We are assuming that all firms face a common demand schedule (\(P_{j,t} = P_{t}\)) and that the wage rate and the real cost of capital is constant over time, but not necessarily across firms.
- 7.
On the hiring side, examples of adjustment costs are the costs of advertising, recruiting and training the new workers, including the costs resulting from disruption in production when the new workers are hired. On the firing side, adjustment costs include mandatory advance notice requirements, severance pay and other procedural inconveniences to dismissal caused by employment protection legislation. A significant part of these adjustment costs are related to personnel and legal departments to deal with hires and fires and thus fixed, i.e., independent of the number of workers that are hired or dismissed (see, e.g., [27, 32]). A firm also incurs in irreversible cost to buy physical assets like firm specific equipment or intangible assets such as reputation, acquired by investments in marketing and advertising, or technical knowledge (see, e.g., [24, 35, 36]). Other non-firm specific investments like office equipment, cars, trucks and computers can have a resale value well below their purchase cost due to the “lemons” problem [36,, p. 1111].
- 8.
In this setting, the decision to enter is akin to the hiring decision, and the decision to exit is akin to the firing decision. This simplification does not change the conclusions of the model as we can consider a firm divided into single production units, with every unit represented individually [8].
- 9.
See [25] for a complete description of the model.
- 10.
The value function for a firm that enters the market is \(V _{j,t} = \frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta } - H_{j}\), while the value function for remaining outside the market is 0. Therefore, the entry condition is \(\frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta } - H_{j}> 0.\)
- 11.
The value function for a firm to remain active is \(V _{j,t} = \frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta }\), while the value function for exiting the market is − F j . Therefore, the exit condition is \(\frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta } <-F_{j}.\)
- 12.
Although, we consider only revenue uncertainty, there could be also uncertainty in input costs (like in the interest rates), exchange rate uncertainty, and tax and regulatory policies uncertainty (see [22, p. 14]).
- 13.
- 14.
See [7] for more detail.
- 15.
Belke [6] extends this argument to the effect of fiscal stimulus package to deal with the recent crisis.
- 16.
- 17.
In fact, the market price can be influenced by the internal market dynamics as in [37], but this is not essential here.
- 18.
The determinantes the unemployment rate are complex. Unemployment can be caused by: (1) the time people take to move between jobs (frictional unemployment); (2) a mismatch of skills in the labour market due to a lack of occupational and geographical mobility, and by technological change (structural unemployment); (3) a lack of aggregate demand (cyclical unemployment). Here we emphasise the third cause. We consider the firms as potential units of labour, with the set of all potential units of labour representing all the jobs that can potentially be created in the economy [28], and unemployment occurs when the economy is bellow full capacity. Moreover, cyclical unemployment may be transformed into structural unemployment by hysteresis mechanisms blurring the distinction between these two types of unemployment.
- 19.
Given the potential number of units of labour that can be created in the economy (the area of the Preisach Triangle—T), the unemployment rate results from a lack of demand represented by the price level, and thus it should be considered as involuntary.
- 20.
See [22, p. 15].
- 21.
In the estimation we set K = 3.
- 22.
There is a certain lack of consensus in literature concerning the best way to construct a proxy for uncertainty. Nonetheless, typically uncertainty is captured by moving variances of the relevant variables like output, inflation, real wages, interest rates, exchanges rates, etc. (see [17], for a survey).
- 23.
We apply the Trace Test performed with four lags in the VAR representation and with an intercept and time trend in the cointegration equation. We report the results of testing the null hypothesis of no cointegration (r = 0) against the existence of at least one cointegrated vector (r).
- 24.
By applying Johansen cointegrating test to the three samples, we do not reject the hypothesis of a single cointegrating vector relating the variables. The trace test statistic, 52.405, 58.81, and 48.166 for the whole sample, for the subsample of small firms and for the subsample of large firms respectively, is greater than the 5 % critical value (42.91).
- 25.
We also report the estimation results for the case of a constant splitting factor (play) in the employment equation.
- 26.
As the estimated play width is greater for the sub sample of the small firms, the linear play algorithm originates a transformed series, which us smoother than in the case of the large firms.
- 27.
\(F\left (\delta = 0\right ) = \frac{\left (R_{unrestricted}^{2}-R_{restricted}^{2}\right )/m} {\left (1-R_{unrestricted}^{2}\right )/\left (N-K\right )}.\)
- 28.
We are relying on 2008 data from Statistics Portugal.
References
Abel, A.B., Dixit, A.K., Eberly J.C., Pindyck, R.S.: Options, the value of capital, and investment. Q. J. Econ. 111(3), 753–777 (1996)
Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., Topol, R.: Unit-root in the wage-price spiral is not hysteresis in unemployment. J. Econ. Stud. 20(1–2), 123–135 (1993)
Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., Topol, R.: Hysteresis revisited: a methodological approach. In: Cross, R. (ed.) The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 Years of the Hypothesis, pp. 181–200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Aoki, M., Yoshikawa, H.: Uncertainty, policy ineffectiveness, and long stagnation for the macroeconomy. Jpn. World Econ. 18(3), 261–272 (2006)
Baldwin, R., Krugman, P.: Persistent trade effects of large exchange rate shocks. Q. J. Econ. 104(4), 635–654 (1989)
Belke, A.: Fiscal stimulus packages and uncertainty in times of crisis. Econ. Policy Open Econ. 39(1), 25–45 (2009)
Belke, A., Göcke, M.: A simple model of hysteresis in employment under exchange rate uncertainty. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 46(3), 260–286 (1999)
Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Exchange rate uncertainty and employment: an algorithm describing the play. Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind. 17, 181–204 (2001)
Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Monetary Policy (In)-Effectiveness Under Uncertainty: Some Normative Implications for European Monetary Policy. Diskussionsbeitge Aus Dem Insitut Fr Volkswirtschaftslehere, Universitt Hohebheim, Stuttgart (2003)
Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Real options effects of employment: does exchange rate uncertainty matters for aggregation. Ger. Econ. Rev. 6(2), 185–203 (2005)
Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Monetary policy and investment decision a stilized treatment of the uncertainty trap. Mimeo, Universities of Stuttgart-Hohenheim and Giessen (2006)
Bentolila, S., Bertola, G.: Firing costs and labour demand: how bad is eurosclerosis? Rev. Econ. Stud. 57(3), 381–402 (1990)
Bernanke, B.S.: Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. Q. J. Econ. 98(1), 85–106 (1983)
Bertola, G.: Job security, employment and wages. Eur. Econ. Rev. 34(4), 851–879 (1990)
Bertola, G.: Labor turnover costs and average labor demand. J. Labor Econ. 10(4), 389–411 (1992)
Caballero, R.J., Engel, E., Haltiwanger, J.: Aggregate employment dynamics: building from microeconomic evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 87(1), 115–137 (1997)
Carruth, A., Dickerson, A., Henly, A.: What do we know about investment under uncertainty? J. Econ. Surv. 14(2), 119–153 (2000)
Cross, R.B.: The macroeconomic consequences of discontinuous adjustment: selective memory of non-dominated extrema. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 41(2), 212–221 (1994)
Dixit, A.: Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. J. Polit. Econ. 97(3), 620–638 (1989)
Dixit, A.: Analytical approximations in models of hysteresis. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 141–151 (1991)
Dixit, A.: Investment and hysteresis. J. Econ. Perspect. 6(1), 107–132 (1992)
Dixit, A., Pindyck, R.: Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
Ejarque, J.M., Portugal, P.: Labor adjustment costs in a panel of establishments: a structural approach. IZA Discussion Papers Series, vol. 3091 (2007)
Folta, T.B., Johnson, D.R., O’Brien J.: Uncertainty, irreversibility, and the likelihood of entry: an empirical assessment of the option to defer. J. Econ. Organ. 61(3), 432–452 (2006)
Göcke, M.: Various concepts of hysteresis applied in economics. J. Econ. Surv. 16, 167–188 (2002)
Hamermesh, D.S.: Labor demand and the structure of adjustment costs. Am. Econ. Rev. 79(4), 674–689 (1989)
Hamermesh, D.S., Pfann, G.A.: Adjustment costs in factor demand. J. Econ. Lit. 34(3), 1264–1292 (1996)
Lang, D.: Involuntary unemployment in a path-dependent system: the case of strong hysteresis. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds.) Path Dependence and Macroeconomics, pp. 80–118. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009)
Mayergoyz, I.D.: Mathematical models of hysteresis and their applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)
Mota, P.R., Vasconcelos, P.B.: Non-convex adjustment costs, hysteresis, and the macrodynamics of employment. J. Post Keynesian Econ. 35(1), 93–112 (2012)
Mota, P.R., Varejão, J., Vasconcelos, P.B.: Hysteresis in the dynamics of employment. Metroeconomica 63(4), 661–692 (2012)
Nickel, S.J.: Employment and labour demand. Economica 45(180), 329–345 (1978)
Phillips, P.C.B.: Fully modified least squares and vector autoregression. Econometrica 63(5), 1023–1078 (1995)
Phillips, P.C.B., Hansen, B.E.: Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 57, 99–125 (1990)
Pindyck, R.S.: Irreversible investment, capacity choice and the value of the firm. Am. Econ. Rev. 78(5), 969–985 (1988)
Pindyck, R.: Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. J. Econ. Lit. 29(3), 1110–1148 (1991)
Piscitelli, L., Grinfeld, M., Lamba, H., Cross, R.: On entry and exit in response to aggregate shocks. Appl. Econ. Lett. 6(9), 569–572 (1999)
Varejão, J., Portugal, P.: Employment dynamics and the structure of labor adjustment costs. J. Labor Econ. 25(1), 137–165 (2007)
Visitin, A.: Differential Models of Hysteresis. Springer, New York (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mota, P.R., Vasconcelos, P.B. (2015). The Macrodynamics of Employment Under Uncertainty. In: Bourguignon, JP., Jeltsch, R., Pinto, A., Viana, M. (eds) Dynamics, Games and Science. CIM Series in Mathematical Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16118-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16118-1_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16117-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16118-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)