Skip to main content

The Macrodynamics of Employment Under Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
Dynamics, Games and Science

Part of the book series: CIM Series in Mathematical Sciences ((CIMSMS,volume 1))

Abstract

In the context of the current Eurozone crisis, the study of the effects of uncertainty in the macrodynamics of employment is a topic of major importance. This paper tackles this challenging question. At a first step a non-ideal relay hysteresis type microeconomic model of employment adjustment with uncertainty is presented. Then, an aggregation mechanism is explicitly considered in order to analyse the aggregate level of employment. Finally, as a new feature, uncertainty is considered endogenously determined by the actual state of the economy. Aggregate time-series built from micro monthly data on a representative sample of Portuguese manufacturing firms is used on a computational implementation of the linear play model of hysteresis. Results illustrate that uncertainty enhances the hysteretic behaviour of employment in small firms, but this effect is not significant for large ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, e.g., [16, 26], and for the Portuguese case [23, 30, 38].

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., [7, 8, 12, 15, 21].

  3. 3.

    See [4, 11].

  4. 4.

    See [17].

  5. 5.

    We follow [8].

  6. 6.

    We are assuming that all firms face a common demand schedule (\(P_{j,t} = P_{t}\)) and that the wage rate and the real cost of capital is constant over time, but not necessarily across firms.

  7. 7.

    On the hiring side, examples of adjustment costs are the costs of advertising, recruiting and training the new workers, including the costs resulting from disruption in production when the new workers are hired. On the firing side, adjustment costs include mandatory advance notice requirements, severance pay and other procedural inconveniences to dismissal caused by employment protection legislation. A significant part of these adjustment costs are related to personnel and legal departments to deal with hires and fires and thus fixed, i.e., independent of the number of workers that are hired or dismissed (see, e.g., [27, 32]). A firm also incurs in irreversible cost to buy physical assets like firm specific equipment or intangible assets such as reputation, acquired by investments in marketing and advertising, or technical knowledge (see, e.g., [24, 35, 36]). Other non-firm specific investments like office equipment, cars, trucks and computers can have a resale value well below their purchase cost due to the “lemons” problem [36,, p. 1111].

  8. 8.

    In this setting, the decision to enter is akin to the hiring decision, and the decision to exit is akin to the firing decision. This simplification does not change the conclusions of the model as we can consider a firm divided into single production units, with every unit represented individually [8].

  9. 9.

    See [25] for a complete description of the model.

  10. 10.

    The value function for a firm that enters the market is \(V _{j,t} = \frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta } - H_{j}\), while the value function for remaining outside the market is 0. Therefore, the entry condition is \(\frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta } - H_{j}> 0.\)

  11. 11.

    The value function for a firm to remain active is \(V _{j,t} = \frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta }\), while the value function for exiting the market is − F j . Therefore, the exit condition is \(\frac{P_{t}-w_{t}-r_{j}k_{j}} {1-\delta } <-F_{j}.\)

  12. 12.

    Although, we consider only revenue uncertainty, there could be also uncertainty in input costs (like in the interest rates), exchange rate uncertainty, and tax and regulatory policies uncertainty (see [22, p. 14]).

  13. 13.

    See [7, 10] for more detail.

  14. 14.

    See [7] for more detail.

  15. 15.

    Belke [6] extends this argument to the effect of fiscal stimulus package to deal with the recent crisis.

  16. 16.

    Preisach-type models of hysteresis have been used as a vehicle to describe the macrodynamics of economic systems—see [2, 3, 18] for an early application to economic problems.

  17. 17.

    In fact, the market price can be influenced by the internal market dynamics as in [37], but this is not essential here.

  18. 18.

    The determinantes the unemployment rate are complex. Unemployment can be caused by: (1) the time people take to move between jobs (frictional unemployment); (2) a mismatch of skills in the labour market due to a lack of occupational and geographical mobility, and by technological change (structural unemployment); (3) a lack of aggregate demand (cyclical unemployment). Here we emphasise the third cause. We consider the firms as potential units of labour, with the set of all potential units of labour representing all the jobs that can potentially be created in the economy [28], and unemployment occurs when the economy is bellow full capacity. Moreover, cyclical unemployment may be transformed into structural unemployment by hysteresis mechanisms blurring the distinction between these two types of unemployment.

  19. 19.

    Given the potential number of units of labour that can be created in the economy (the area of the Preisach Triangle—T), the unemployment rate results from a lack of demand represented by the price level, and thus it should be considered as involuntary.

  20. 20.

    See [22, p. 15].

  21. 21.

    In the estimation we set K = 3. 

  22. 22.

    There is a certain lack of consensus in literature concerning the best way to construct a proxy for uncertainty. Nonetheless, typically uncertainty is captured by moving variances of the relevant variables like output, inflation, real wages, interest rates, exchanges rates, etc. (see [17], for a survey).

  23. 23.

    We apply the Trace Test performed with four lags in the VAR representation and with an intercept and time trend in the cointegration equation. We report the results of testing the null hypothesis of no cointegration (r = 0) against the existence of at least one cointegrated vector (r).

  24. 24.

    By applying Johansen cointegrating test to the three samples, we do not reject the hypothesis of a single cointegrating vector relating the variables. The trace test statistic, 52.405, 58.81, and 48.166 for the whole sample, for the subsample of small firms and for the subsample of large firms respectively, is greater than the 5 % critical value (42.91).

  25. 25.

    We also report the estimation results for the case of a constant splitting factor (play) in the employment equation.

  26. 26.

    As the estimated play width is greater for the sub sample of the small firms, the linear play algorithm originates a transformed series, which us smoother than in the case of the large firms.

  27. 27.

    \(F\left (\delta = 0\right ) = \frac{\left (R_{unrestricted}^{2}-R_{restricted}^{2}\right )/m} {\left (1-R_{unrestricted}^{2}\right )/\left (N-K\right )}.\)

  28. 28.

    We are relying on 2008 data from Statistics Portugal.

References

  1. Abel, A.B., Dixit, A.K., Eberly J.C., Pindyck, R.S.: Options, the value of capital, and investment. Q. J. Econ. 111(3), 753–777 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., Topol, R.: Unit-root in the wage-price spiral is not hysteresis in unemployment. J. Econ. Stud. 20(1–2), 123–135 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amable, B., Henry, J., Lordon, F., Topol, R.: Hysteresis revisited: a methodological approach. In: Cross, R. (ed.) The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 Years of the Hypothesis, pp. 181–200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aoki, M., Yoshikawa, H.: Uncertainty, policy ineffectiveness, and long stagnation for the macroeconomy. Jpn. World Econ. 18(3), 261–272 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin, R., Krugman, P.: Persistent trade effects of large exchange rate shocks. Q. J. Econ. 104(4), 635–654 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belke, A.: Fiscal stimulus packages and uncertainty in times of crisis. Econ. Policy Open Econ. 39(1), 25–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belke, A., Göcke, M.: A simple model of hysteresis in employment under exchange rate uncertainty. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 46(3), 260–286 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Exchange rate uncertainty and employment: an algorithm describing the play. Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind. 17, 181–204 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Monetary Policy (In)-Effectiveness Under Uncertainty: Some Normative Implications for European Monetary Policy. Diskussionsbeitge Aus Dem Insitut Fr Volkswirtschaftslehere, Universitt Hohebheim, Stuttgart (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Real options effects of employment: does exchange rate uncertainty matters for aggregation. Ger. Econ. Rev. 6(2), 185–203 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Belke, A., Göcke, M.: Monetary policy and investment decision a stilized treatment of the uncertainty trap. Mimeo, Universities of Stuttgart-Hohenheim and Giessen (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bentolila, S., Bertola, G.: Firing costs and labour demand: how bad is eurosclerosis? Rev. Econ. Stud. 57(3), 381–402 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernanke, B.S.: Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. Q. J. Econ. 98(1), 85–106 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertola, G.: Job security, employment and wages. Eur. Econ. Rev. 34(4), 851–879 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertola, G.: Labor turnover costs and average labor demand. J. Labor Econ. 10(4), 389–411 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caballero, R.J., Engel, E., Haltiwanger, J.: Aggregate employment dynamics: building from microeconomic evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 87(1), 115–137 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carruth, A., Dickerson, A., Henly, A.: What do we know about investment under uncertainty? J. Econ. Surv. 14(2), 119–153 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cross, R.B.: The macroeconomic consequences of discontinuous adjustment: selective memory of non-dominated extrema. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 41(2), 212–221 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixit, A.: Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. J. Polit. Econ. 97(3), 620–638 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dixit, A.: Analytical approximations in models of hysteresis. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 141–151 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dixit, A.: Investment and hysteresis. J. Econ. Perspect. 6(1), 107–132 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dixit, A., Pindyck, R.: Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ejarque, J.M., Portugal, P.: Labor adjustment costs in a panel of establishments: a structural approach. IZA Discussion Papers Series, vol. 3091 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Folta, T.B., Johnson, D.R., O’Brien J.: Uncertainty, irreversibility, and the likelihood of entry: an empirical assessment of the option to defer. J. Econ. Organ. 61(3), 432–452 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Göcke, M.: Various concepts of hysteresis applied in economics. J. Econ. Surv. 16, 167–188 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamermesh, D.S.: Labor demand and the structure of adjustment costs. Am. Econ. Rev. 79(4), 674–689 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hamermesh, D.S., Pfann, G.A.: Adjustment costs in factor demand. J. Econ. Lit. 34(3), 1264–1292 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lang, D.: Involuntary unemployment in a path-dependent system: the case of strong hysteresis. In: Arestis, P., Sawyer, M. (eds.) Path Dependence and Macroeconomics, pp. 80–118. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mayergoyz, I.D.: Mathematical models of hysteresis and their applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mota, P.R., Vasconcelos, P.B.: Non-convex adjustment costs, hysteresis, and the macrodynamics of employment. J. Post Keynesian Econ. 35(1), 93–112 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mota, P.R., Varejão, J., Vasconcelos, P.B.: Hysteresis in the dynamics of employment. Metroeconomica 63(4), 661–692 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Nickel, S.J.: Employment and labour demand. Economica 45(180), 329–345 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Phillips, P.C.B.: Fully modified least squares and vector autoregression. Econometrica 63(5), 1023–1078 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Phillips, P.C.B., Hansen, B.E.: Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 57, 99–125 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Pindyck, R.S.: Irreversible investment, capacity choice and the value of the firm. Am. Econ. Rev. 78(5), 969–985 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pindyck, R.: Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. J. Econ. Lit. 29(3), 1110–1148 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Piscitelli, L., Grinfeld, M., Lamba, H., Cross, R.: On entry and exit in response to aggregate shocks. Appl. Econ. Lett. 6(9), 569–572 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Varejão, J., Portugal, P.: Employment dynamics and the structure of labor adjustment costs. J. Labor Econ. 25(1), 137–165 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Visitin, A.: Differential Models of Hysteresis. Springer, New York (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo R. Mota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mota, P.R., Vasconcelos, P.B. (2015). The Macrodynamics of Employment Under Uncertainty. In: Bourguignon, JP., Jeltsch, R., Pinto, A., Viana, M. (eds) Dynamics, Games and Science. CIM Series in Mathematical Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16118-1_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics