Abstract
During recent years, a concern for the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare systems has been developing [1–4]. Such concerns have been fuelled by the increasing expenditure for healthcare in most countries, especially considering the aging populations that will certainly drive the expenditures higher. At the same time, many questions have been raised about the benefits and risks of healthcare. The main concern might be summarised as assuring “value for money in healthcare” [5].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
World Health Organization. The world health report 2000: improving health system performance, Geneva, 2001.
Anderson G, Sotir Hussey P. Comparing health system performance in OECD countries. Health Affairs. 2001;20:3219-32.
The World Bank. Creating evidence for better health financing decisions. Washington DC, 2012.
Squires D. Multinational comparisons of health systems data 2011. Washington DC: The Commonwealth Fund, 2011.
Sorensen C, Drummond M, Kanavos P. Ensuring value for money in health care: the role of health technology assessment in the European Union. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. European Observatory Studies Series No. 13, 2008.
Office of Technology Assessment. Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1978.
Jonsson E. History of health technology assessment in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(Suppl 1):42-52.
INAHTA website. Accessed April 2014.
Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta, HD, Bero L, Bonair A, Cochet C, et al. Eur-Assess project subgroup report on dissemination and impact. Int J Technol Ass Health Care. 1997;13:220-86.
EUnetHTA. Facilitation of national strategy for continuous development and sustainability of HTA. EUnetHTA website, November 2011.
Hailey D, Babidge W, Cameron A, Davignon L. Health technology assessment agencies and decision makers. An INAHTA guidance document. INAHTA website, May 2010.
Lehoux P, Denis JL, Tailliez S, Hivon M. Dissemination of health technology assessment: identifying the visions guiding an evolving innovation in Canada. Journal of Health Politics, Policies and Law. 2005;30:603-42.
Banta D, Oortwijn W. Conclusion. Health technology assessment and health care in the European Union. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:626-35.
Velasco Garrido M, Kristensen F, Nielson C, Busse R, editors. Health technology assessment and health policy making in Europe. Current states, challenges and potential. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health systems and Policies, Observatory Studies Series No. 14, 2008.
Oortwijn W, Broos P, Vondeling H, Banta D, Todorova L. Mapping of health technology assessment in selected countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:424-34.
Lemgruber, A. Presentation to the WHO Global Forum on Medical Devices, Geneva, 23 November, 2012.
Novaes H, Elias F. Use of health technology assessment in decision-making processes by the Brazilian Ministry of Health on the incorporation of technologies in the Brazilian Unified National Health system. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29(Suppl):S7-S16.
//:keionline.org/sites/default/files/PhRMA 2014 Special 301 Submission.pdf.
Davignon L, Beauchamp S, Martin V. Logic model for improving the impact of public health technology assessment organization in decision making in the health system. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009;38(Suppl):S.67.
Policena J, Clifford T, Elshaug A, Mitton C, Russell E, Skidmore B. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision making in health care: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:174-84.
Hailey D. Personal communication. April, 2014.
Birstin HR, Conn A, Setnik G, Rucker DW, Cleary PD, O’Neil AC, et al. Benchmarking and quality improvement. The Harvard Emergency Department Quality Study. Am J Med. 1999;107:437-39.
Birstin HR. The journey to electronic performance measurement. Ann Int Med. 2013;158:131-32.
Carlson J, Sullivan S, Garrison L, Neumann PJ, Veenstra DL. Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010;960:179-90.
Chernew ME, Rosen AB, Fendrick AM. Value-based insurance design. Health Affairs. 2007;27:103-12.
Fendrick AM, Martin JJ, Weiss AE. Value-based insurance design: more health at any price. Health Serv Res 2012;47:404-13.
Starr M, Chalmers I, Clarke M, Oxman A. The origins, evolution, and future of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(Suppl 1):182-95.
Institute of Health Economics. IHE report, health technology assessment on the net. Alberta Canada, 2013.
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group website. Accessed April, 2014.
International Diabetes Federation website. Accessed April, 2014.
IDF. Position statement: self-management education. IDF website. April, 2014.
ECORYS. DAWN2 follow up health policy analysis - enhancing person centred diabetes care. Final report. Rotterdam. 19 March, 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
David Banta, H. (2015). Dissemination of Health Technology Assessment. In: del Llano-Señarís, J., Campillo-Artero, C. (eds) Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy Today: A Multifaceted View of their Unstable Crossroads. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15004-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15004-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Adis, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15003-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15004-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)