Skip to main content

Positive Mappings in Quantum Physics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Methods in Physics

Part of the book series: Progress in Mathematical Physics ((PMP,volume 69))

  • 5715 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers some results which will help to understand some foundational aspects of quantum mechanics. It relies on some results presented in the last chapter. The first section discusses the general form of σ-additive probability measures on the complete lattice of orthogonal projections on a Hilbert space (Gleason’s theorem) and its variations. In quantum mechanics and in quantum information theory quantum channels or quantum operations are defined mathematically as completely positive maps between density operators which do not increase the trace (see for instance the book “Quantum Computation and Quantum Information” by M.A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Cambridge University Press 2000). Thus in the next section we determine the general form of quantum operations on a separable Hilbert space, i.e., we prove Kraus’ first representation theorem for operations. Usually quantum information theory studies systems of some finite dimension n and then density operators are just positive \(n \times n\) matrices with complex coefficients which have trace 1. In this context the relevant C\(^*\)-algebra is just the space \(M_n(\mathbb C)\) of all \(n \times n\) matrices with complex entries, for some \(n \in \mathbb{N}\). Therefore in the last section we determine the general form of completely positive maps for these algebras (Choi’s results). Of course, this is a special case of Stinespring factorization theorem, but some important aspects are added.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gleason AM. Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. J Math Mech. 1957;6:885–893.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chernoff PR. Andy Gleason and quantum mechanics. Notices AMS. 2009;56(10):1253–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Busch P. Quantum states and generalized observables: a simple proof of Gleason’s theorem. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;91(12/120403):1–4.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Richman F, Bridges D. A constructive proof of Gleason’s theorem. J Funct Anal. 1999;162:287–312.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kraus K. States, effects, and operations. Lecture notes in physics. Vol. 190. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Busch P. Unsharp reality and joint measurements for spin observable. Phys Rev D. 1986;33:2253–2261.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook C, Keane M, Moran W. An elementary proof of Gleason’s theorem. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc. 1985;98:117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes R. The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Harvard University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi MD. Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 1975;10:285–290.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamiolkowski A. Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators. Rep Math Phys. 1972;3:27–5.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanchard P, Olkiewicz R. Decoherence induced transition from quantum to classical dynamics. Rev Math Phys. 2003;15:217–243.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanchard P, Olkiewicz R. Decoherence as irreversible dynamical process in open qsystemssystems. In: Joye A, Attal S, Pillet CA, editors. Open quantum systems III recent developments. Lecture notes in mathematics. Vol. 1882. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 117–159.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blanchard P, Hellmich M. Decoherence in infinite quantum systems. In: Brüning E, Konrad T, Petruccione F, editors. Quantum Africa 2010: theoretical and experimental foundations of recent quantum technology. Vol. 1469. AIP Conference Proceedings; 2012. pp. 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fröhlich J, Schubnel B. Do we understand quantum mechanics—finally? In: Reiter WL, Yngvason J, editors. Erwin Schrödinger—50 years after. ESI lectures in mathematics and physics. Vol. 9. Zuerich, European Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Omnès R. The interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schlosshauer M. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. 2nd ed. Berlin, Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Blanchard .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blanchard, P., Brüning, E. (2015). Positive Mappings in Quantum Physics. In: Mathematical Methods in Physics. Progress in Mathematical Physics, vol 69. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14045-2_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics