Skip to main content

Doctors’ Clinical Inertia as Myopia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 719 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 118))

Abstract

The inadequate physician adherence to current good practice guidelines has been recently described as clinical inertia . The aim of this chapter is to show that clinical inertia shares with patients’ nonadherence to medical prescriptions the appearance of myopia, and may be, at least sometimes, the result of inappropriate use of empathy by the doctor . I propose that clinical inertia occurs when the doctor imagines her patient’s feelings, for instance that she will refuse the treatment, and becomes overly involved in the immediacy of those emotions at the expense of the future . The doctor, in exercising empathy, should not forget that her own preference is different, and that she should propose a treatment which would protect her patient’s future: Not doing it is clinical inertia. Finally, how, in the context of the autonomy principle, someone (a Health Care Provider) can decide what is good (a treatment) for someone else (a patient) without falling into paternalism? Actually this analysis leads to a paradox: not only is the principle of benevolence sometime conflicting with the principle of autonomy, but physician’s benevolence may enter in conflict with the mere respect of the patient; I propose a solution to this paradox relying on the importance of patient education and trust in the patient-physician relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I use purposely the word “invention”. In the same vein, Schneewind (1998) described the conceptualization of autonomy as an invention.

  2. 2.

    What follows is taken from Reach (2013).

References

  • Aristotle. Rhetoric. Book 2, Chap. 4; 1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachimont J, Cogneau J, Letourmy A. Pourquoi les médecins généralistes n’observent-ils pas les recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques ? L’exemple du diabète de type 2. Sciences Sociales et Santé. 2006;24:75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black DM. Sympathy reconfigured: some reflections on sympathy, empathy and the discovery of values. Int J Psychoanal. 2004;85:579–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane AL. 1931–1971: a critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics; 1979, p. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogneau J, Lehr-Drylewicz AM, Bachimont J, Letourmy A. Écarts entre le référentiel et la pratique dans le diabète de type 2. Presse Médicale. 2007;36:764–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall S. Welfare and rational care, princeton monographs in philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drass J, Kell S, Osborn M, Bausell B, Corcoran J Jr, Moskowitz A, Fleming B. Diabetes care for medicare beneficiaries. Attitudes and behaviors of primary care physicians. Diab Care. 1998;21:1282–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin G. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • el-Kebbi IM, Ziemer DC, Gallina DL, Dunbar V, Phillips LS. Diabetes in urban African-Americans. XV. In: Identification of barriers to provider adherence to management protocols. Diab Care 1999; 22:1617–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patent relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196:129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt H. The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridja NH, Mesquita B. Beliefs through emotions. In: Fridja NH, Manstead ASR, Bem S, editors. Emotions and beliefs how feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R, Adams AS, Trinacty CM, Zhang F, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, Meigs JB, Ross-Degnan D. Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management. Diab Care. 2007;30:807–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves JE. Taking care of the hateful patient. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:883–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin R. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. Compliance in health care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippocrates. Hippocratic writings (trans: Lloyd GER, Chadwick J). Penguin Classics; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojat M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Westminster: Allen Lane, Penguin Books; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr EA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Klamerus ML, Subramanian U, Hogan MM, Hofer TP. The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:717–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie CA, Satin Rapaport W, Matheson D, Stone R, Enfield G. Psychological insulin resistance: a missed diagnosis. Diab Spectrum. 1994;7:52–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. Dispositional theories of values. Proc Aristotelian Soc. 1989;63:113–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles RW. Cognitive bias and planning error: nullification of evidence-based medicine in the nursing home. J Am Med Dir Ass. 2010;11:194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LV, Goldstein J. More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county-hospital setting. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:1388–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Romero RL, Bowers KW. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Family Med. 2007;5:196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips P. Type 2 diabetes—Failure, blame and guilt in the adoption of insulin therapy. Rev Diabet Stud. 2005;2:35–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips LS. It’s time to overcome clinical inertia. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:783–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL, Miller CD, Ziemer DC, Barnes CS. Clinical inertia. Ann Int Med. 2001;135:825–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reach G. Patients nonadherence and healthcare provider inertia are clinical myopia. Diab Metab. 2008;34:382–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reach G. Obstacles to patient education: a transtheoretical analysis. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;77:192–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reach, G. Obedience and motivation as mechanisms for adherence to medication. A study in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:523–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reach G. Patient autonomy in chronic care: solving a paradox. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;8:15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reach, G. Clinical inertia, a critique of medical reason (Foreword by Elster J). Berlin: Springer; 2014a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reach, G. Is it possible to improve patient adherence to long-term therapies? Bioethica Forum. 2014b;7:90–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CR. A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In: Koch S, editor. Psychology: a study of science. vol. 3. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47:213–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind JB. The invention of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shagai Y. Salvaging the concept of nudge. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:487–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walrvaraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control. Do specialists differ from primary physicians? Diab Care. 2005;28:600–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinebourne EA, Bush A. For paternalism in the doctor-patient relationship. In: Gillon R, Lloyd A, editors. Principles of health care ethics. New York: Wiley; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappolet C. Emotions and the intelligibility of akratic actions. In: Stroud S, Tappolet C, editors. Weakness of will and practical irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom DH. Stanford trust study physicians, physician behaviors that predict patient trust. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:323–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev. 2003;110:403–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BJ, Hollenbeak CS, Weiner M, Ten Have T, Tang SS. Effect of unrelated comorbid conditions on hypertension management. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:578–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wispé L. The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50:314–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. Therapeutic patient education: continuing education programmes for health care providers in the field of prevention of chronic diseases. Copenhagen: WHO; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Reach .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reach, G. (2015). Doctors’ Clinical Inertia as Myopia. In: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long-Term Therapies. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12265-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics