Abstract
The inadequate physician adherence to current good practice guidelines has been recently described as clinical inertia . The aim of this chapter is to show that clinical inertia shares with patients’ nonadherence to medical prescriptions the appearance of myopia, and may be, at least sometimes, the result of inappropriate use of empathy by the doctor . I propose that clinical inertia occurs when the doctor imagines her patient’s feelings, for instance that she will refuse the treatment, and becomes overly involved in the immediacy of those emotions at the expense of the future . The doctor, in exercising empathy, should not forget that her own preference is different, and that she should propose a treatment which would protect her patient’s future: Not doing it is clinical inertia. Finally, how, in the context of the autonomy principle, someone (a Health Care Provider) can decide what is good (a treatment) for someone else (a patient) without falling into paternalism? Actually this analysis leads to a paradox: not only is the principle of benevolence sometime conflicting with the principle of autonomy, but physician’s benevolence may enter in conflict with the mere respect of the patient; I propose a solution to this paradox relying on the importance of patient education and trust in the patient-physician relationship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aristotle. Rhetoric. Book 2, Chap. 4; 1381.
Bachimont J, Cogneau J, Letourmy A. Pourquoi les médecins généralistes n’observent-ils pas les recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques ? L’exemple du diabète de type 2. Sciences Sociales et Santé. 2006;24:75–102.
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Black DM. Sympathy reconfigured: some reflections on sympathy, empathy and the discovery of values. Int J Psychoanal. 2004;85:579–95.
Cochrane AL. 1931–1971: a critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics; 1979, p. 1–11.
Cogneau J, Lehr-Drylewicz AM, Bachimont J, Letourmy A. Écarts entre le référentiel et la pratique dans le diabète de type 2. Presse Médicale. 2007;36:764–70.
Darwall S. Welfare and rational care, princeton monographs in philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.
Davidson D. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2001.
Drass J, Kell S, Osborn M, Bausell B, Corcoran J Jr, Moskowitz A, Fleming B. Diabetes care for medicare beneficiaries. Attitudes and behaviors of primary care physicians. Diab Care. 1998;21:1282–7.
Dworkin G. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
el-Kebbi IM, Ziemer DC, Gallina DL, Dunbar V, Phillips LS. Diabetes in urban African-Americans. XV. In: Identification of barriers to provider adherence to management protocols. Diab Care 1999; 22:1617–20.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patent relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:221–6.
Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196:129–36.
Frankfurt H. The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
Fridja NH, Mesquita B. Beliefs through emotions. In: Fridja NH, Manstead ASR, Bem S, editors. Emotions and beliefs how feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Grant R, Adams AS, Trinacty CM, Zhang F, Kleinman K, Soumerai SB, Meigs JB, Ross-Degnan D. Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management. Diab Care. 2007;30:807–12.
Groves JE. Taking care of the hateful patient. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:883–7.
Hardin R. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 2004.
Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL. Compliance in health care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.
Hippocrates. Hippocratic writings (trans: Lloyd GER, Chadwick J). Penguin Classics; 1978.
Hojat M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. New York: Springer; 2007.
Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Westminster: Allen Lane, Penguin Books; 2011.
Kerr EA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Klamerus ML, Subramanian U, Hogan MM, Hofer TP. The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:717–27.
Leslie CA, Satin Rapaport W, Matheson D, Stone R, Enfield G. Psychological insulin resistance: a missed diagnosis. Diab Spectrum. 1994;7:52–7.
Lewis D. Dispositional theories of values. Proc Aristotelian Soc. 1989;63:113–37.
Miles RW. Cognitive bias and planning error: nullification of evidence-based medicine in the nursing home. J Am Med Dir Ass. 2010;11:194–203.
Miller LV, Goldstein J. More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county-hospital setting. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:1388–91.
O’Neill O. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Romero RL, Bowers KW. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Family Med. 2007;5:196–201.
Phillips P. Type 2 diabetes—Failure, blame and guilt in the adoption of insulin therapy. Rev Diabet Stud. 2005;2:35–9.
Phillips LS. It’s time to overcome clinical inertia. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:783–5.
Phillips LS, Branch WT, Cook CB, Doyle JP, El-Kebbi IM, Gallina DL, Miller CD, Ziemer DC, Barnes CS. Clinical inertia. Ann Int Med. 2001;135:825–34.
Reach G. Patients nonadherence and healthcare provider inertia are clinical myopia. Diab Metab. 2008;34:382–5.
Reach G. Obstacles to patient education: a transtheoretical analysis. Patient Educ Counsel. 2009;77:192–6.
Reach, G. Obedience and motivation as mechanisms for adherence to medication. A study in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:523–31.
Reach G. Patient autonomy in chronic care: solving a paradox. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;8:15–24.
Reach, G. Clinical inertia, a critique of medical reason (Foreword by Elster J). Berlin: Springer; 2014a.
Reach, G. Is it possible to improve patient adherence to long-term therapies? Bioethica Forum. 2014b;7:90–7.
Rogers CR. A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In: Koch S, editor. Psychology: a study of science. vol. 3. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 1959.
Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47:213–20.
Schneewind JB. The invention of autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Shagai Y. Salvaging the concept of nudge. J Med Ethics. 2013;39:487–93.
Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walrvaraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control. Do specialists differ from primary physicians? Diab Care. 2005;28:600–6.
Shinebourne EA, Bush A. For paternalism in the doctor-patient relationship. In: Gillon R, Lloyd A, editors. Principles of health care ethics. New York: Wiley; 1994.
Tappolet C. Emotions and the intelligibility of akratic actions. In: Stroud S, Tappolet C, editors. Weakness of will and practical irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2003.
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.
Thom DH. Stanford trust study physicians, physician behaviors that predict patient trust. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:323–8.
Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev. 2003;110:403–21.
Turner BJ, Hollenbeak CS, Weiner M, Ten Have T, Tang SS. Effect of unrelated comorbid conditions on hypertension management. Ann Int Med. 2008;148:578–86.
Wispé L. The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50:314–21.
World Health Organisation. Therapeutic patient education: continuing education programmes for health care providers in the field of prevention of chronic diseases. Copenhagen: WHO; 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reach, G. (2015). Doctors’ Clinical Inertia as Myopia. In: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long-Term Therapies. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 118. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12265-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12265-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12264-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12265-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)