Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New ICMI Study Series ((NISS))

  • 6663 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides commentary and reflection on the goals and aims of this specific ICMI study, with comments situated within a personal background based on the theory of didactical situations. Detailed comments are made about Chaps. 2, 5, and 6, with some references made to various plenary chapters. Throughout, questions raised and/or answered in the chapters are discussed, as well as implications for future research in task design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These projects are Fibonacci (www.fibonacci-project.eu), Primas (www.primas-project.eu), Mascil (www.mascil-project.eu), and Assist-Me (www.assistme.ku.dk).

References

  • Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M. (Ed.). (2009). Connecting approaches to technology enhanced learning in mathematics: The TELMA experience. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(3), 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M. (2015). Perspectives on design research: The case of didactical engineering. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 467–496). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M., Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2011). Research praxeologies and networking theories. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 281–290). Rzeszów: University of Rzeszów.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M., & Mariotti, M. A. (2014). Networking theoretical frames: The ReMath enterprise. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(3), 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 746–805). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum (revised edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (Eds.). (2014). Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douady, R. (1986). Jeux de cadres et dialectique outil-objet [Games between settings and tool-object dialectics]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine [Semiosis and human thinking]. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2013). Textbooks’ design and digital resources. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education: Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (pp. 325–336). Oxford. Available from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00834054

  • Haspekian, M., & Artigue, M. (2007). L’intégration de technologies professionnelles à l’enseignement dans une perspective instrumentale: le cas des tableurs [The integration of professional technologies in teaching from an instrumental perspective: the case of spreadsheets]. In G. Baron, D. Guin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), Environnements informatisés et ressources numériques pour l’apprentissage (pp. 37–63). Paris: Hermès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maracci, M., Cazes, C., Vandebrouck, F., & Mariotti, M. A. (2013). Synergies between theoretical approaches to mathematics education with technology: A case study through a cross-analysis methodology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 461–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolinas, C., Abboud-Blanchard, M., Bueno-Ravel, L., Douek, N., Fluckiger, A., Gibel, P., et al. (Eds.). (2011). En amont et en aval des ingénieries didactiques. XVeécole d’été de didactique des mathématiques. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Rocard report: Science education now: A new pedagogy for the future of Europe (Technical Report). European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1991). La théorie des champs conceptuels [The theory of conceptual fields]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 10(2–3), 133–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Artigue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Open Access This book was originally published with exclusive rights reserved by the Publisher in 2015 and was licensed as an open access publication in March 2021 under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this book may be included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material or in the Correction Note appended to the book. For details on rights and licenses please read the Correction https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_13. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Artigue, M. (2015). Some Reflections on ICMI Study 22. In: Watson, A., Ohtani, M. (eds) Task Design In Mathematics Education. New ICMI Study Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics