Abstract
Modelling is a central aspect of the research process in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), which occurs in the cognitive context of an interactive balance between theory, experiment, and computation. The STEM learning processes should then also involve modelling in environments where there is a balanced interplay between theory, experiment, and computation. However, an adequate integration of computational themes in STEM high school and undergraduate university curricula remains to be achieved. In this chapter, we present an approach to embed computational modelling activities in the STEM learning processes which may be fruitfully adopted by curricula at secondary and introductory university levels, as well as be a valuable instrument for the professional development of teachers. To illustrate, we consider the example of physics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Araújo, I., Veit, E., & Moreira, M. (2008). Physics student’s performance using computational modelling activities to improve kinematics graphs interpretation. Computers & Education, 50, 1128–1140.
Beichner, R., Bernold, L., Burniston, E., Dail, P., Felder, R., Gastineau, J., et al. (1999). Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. Physics Education Research, American Journal of Physics Supplement, 67, 16–24.
Bliss, J., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Tools for exploratory learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 5(1), 37–50.
Blum, W., Galbraith, P., Henn, H.-W., & Niss, M. (Eds.). (2007). Modellng and applications in mathematics education. New York: Springer.
Bork, A. (1967). Fortran for physics. Reading, Massachusetts, USA: Addison-Wesley.
Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (2008). Computational physics in the introductory calculus-based course. American Journal of Physics, 76, 307–313.
Chalmers, A. (1999). What is this thing called science?. London, UK: Open University Press.
Christian, W., & Esquembre, F. (2007). Modelling physics with easy java simulations. The Physics Teacher, 45(8), 475–480.
Crump, T. (2002). A brief history of science, as seen through the development of scientific instruments. London, UK: Robinson.
Dorneles, F., Araújo, I., & Veit, E. (2008). Computational modelling and simulation activities to help a meaningful learning of electricity basic concepts. Part II: RLC circuits. Revista Brasileira de Ensino da Física, 30(3), 3308–1.
Feynman, R. (1967). The character of physical law. New York, USA: MIT Press.
Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043–1048.
Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modelling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55, 440–454.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158.
High Performance Systems. (1997). Stella, version 5. Hannover, NH: High Performance Systems.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall.
McDermott, L. (1991). Millikan lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned–closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301–315.
McDermott, L. (1997). Physics by inquiry. New York, USA: Wiley.
Neunzert, H., & Siddiqi, A. (2000). Topics in industrial mathematics: case studies and related mathematical models. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Neves, R., Neves, M. C., & Teodoro, V. (2013). Modellus: Interactive computational modelling to improve teaching of physics in the geosciences. Computers & Geosciences, 56, 119–126.
Neves, R., Silva, J., & Teodoro, V. (2008). Improving the general physics university course with computational modelling. Poster presented at the 2008 Gordon Research Conference, Physics Research and Education: Computation and Computer-Based Instruction, Bryan University, USA.
Neves, R., Silva, J., & Teodoro, V. (2009). Computational modelling with Modellus: an enhancement vector for the general university physics course. In A. Bilsel & M. Garip (Eds.), Frontiers in science education research (pp. 461–470). Famagusta, Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University Press.
Neves, R., Silva, J., & Teodoro, V. (2011). Improving learning in science and mathematics with exploratory and interactive computational modelling. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo-Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling Vol. 1, ICTMA14: Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (pp. 331–341). Dordrecht: Springer.
Neves, R., & Teodoro, V. (2012). Improving science and mathematics education with computational modelling in interactive engagement environments. In T. Simos, G. Psihoyios, C. Tsitouras and Z. Anastassi (Eds.), Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics 2012, AIP Conference Proceedings 1479, 1806–1809.
Ogborn, J. (1985). Dynamic modelling system. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman.
Ogborn, J. (1994). Modelling clay for computers. In B. Jennison & J. Ogborn (Eds.), Wonder and delight, Essays in science education in honour of the life and work of Eric Rogers 1902–1990 (pp. 103–114). Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing.
Redish, E., & Wilson, J. (1993). Student programming in the introductory physics course: M.U.P.P.E.T. American Journal of Physics, 61, 222–232.
Reif, F. (2008). Applying cognitive science to education: Thinking and learning in scientific and other complex domains. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Schwartz, J. (2007). Models, simulations, and exploratory environments: A tentative taxonomy. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 161–172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slooten, O., van den Berg, E., & Ellermeijer, T. (Eds.). (2006). Proceedings of the International Group on Research on Physics Education (GIREP) 2006 conference: modelling in physics and physics education. Amsterdam, Holland: European Physical Society.
Teodoro, V. (2002). Modellus: learning physics with mathematical modelling. PhD Thesis. Lisboa, Portugal: Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Teodoro, V. (2005). Cognitive artefacts, technology and physics education. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 11, 173–189.
Teodoro, V., & Neves, R. (2011). Mathematical modelling in science and mathematics education. Computer Physics Communications, 182, 8–10.
Acknowledgments
Work supported by Unidade de Investigação Educação e Desenvolvimento (UIED) and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Programa Compromisso com a Ciência, Ciência 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neves, R.G., Silva, J.C., Teodoro, V.D. (2013). Integrating Computational Modelling in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. In: Damlamian, A., Rodrigues, J., Sträßer, R. (eds) Educational Interfaces between Mathematics and Industry. New ICMI Study Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02270-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02270-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02269-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02270-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)