Abstract
The tale of mathematics and physics has been one of love and hate, of harmony and discord, and of friendship and animosity. From their simultaneous inception in the shape of calculus in the seventeenth century, through an intense and interactive development in the eighteenth and most of the nineteenth century, to an estrangement in the latter part of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century, mathematics and physics have experienced the best of times and the worst of times. Sometimes, as in the case of calculus, nature dictates a mathematical dialect in which the narrative of physics is to be spoken. Other times, man, building upon that dialect, develops a sophisticated language in which—as in the case of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian interpretation of dynamics—the narrative of physics is set in the most beautiful poetry. But the happiest courtship, and the most exhilarating relationship, takes place when a discovery in physics leads to a development in mathematics that in turn feeds back into a better understanding of physics, leading to new ideas or a new interpretation of existing ideas. Such a state of affairs began in the 1930s with the advent of quantum mechanics, and, after a lull of about 30 years, revived in the late 1960s. We are fortunate to be witnesses to one of the most productive collaborations between the physics and mathematics communities in the history of both.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
E.P. Wigner, On the Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group, Ann. of Math. 40 (1939) 149–204.
- 2.
To distinguish between identities of different groups, we sometimes write e G for the identity of the group G.
- 3.
The reader is warned that what we have denoted by O(p,n−p) is sometimes denoted by other authors by O(n−p,p) or O(n,p) or O(p,n).
- 4.
It is customary to write O(n) and SO(n) for O(0,n) and SO(0,n).
- 5.
Some authors switch our right and left in their definition.
- 6.
The set of cosets of a subgroup is the analog of factor space of a subspace of a vector space (Sect. 2.1.2) and factor algebra of a subalgebra of an algebra (Sect. 3.2.1). We have seen that, while a factor space of any subspace can be turned into a vector space, that is not the case with an algebra: the subalgebra must be an ideal of the algebra. There is a corresponding restriction for the subgroup.
- 7.
Compare this theorem with the set-theoretic result obtained in Chap. 1 where the map X/⋈→f(X) was shown to be bijective if ⋈ is the equivalence relation induced by f.
- 8.
Recall from Chap. 1 that \(x\stackrel{f}{\longmapsto}y\) means y=f(x).
References
Rotman, J.: An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, 3rd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights (1984)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hassani, S. (2013). Group Theory. In: Mathematical Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01195-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01195-0_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01194-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01195-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)