Skip to main content

Artificial Neural Networks

  • Chapter
  • 2555 Accesses

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANN) enable problem solving by changing the structure of interconnected components. In analogy to the biological model, these interconnected elements are referred to as neurons and make up the basic units of information processing. A simple model of a biological neuron is composed of the following components, illustrated in figure 9.1: A large number of short nerve fibers called dendrites conduct impulses from the adjacent neurons to the cell body. The cell reacts to this input with an impulse that is carried to other cells by an axon. An axon is a long nerve fiber that may be up to one meter in length and undergoes extensive branching at its end which enables communication with dendrites or other cell bodies. The neurons are connected via synapses. When an electrical impulse runs through an axon, this causes the synapse to release a substance called a neurotransmitter which is picked up by a neighboring dendrite and changes the electric potential of the cell. When a particular threshold value is reached, an action potential is generated in a cell that in turn is sent along the axon through the synapses to the dendrites of the connected neurons. The human brain has approximately 1011 interconnected neurons whose reaction time is estimated at one millisecond. The average processing time for the recognition of complex visual and/or acoustic information by a human brain is approximately 0.1 seconds. If biological neuronal systems would work like strictly sequential digital computers, only 100 instructions would be possible in that time frame [12, p. 172].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellgrad MI, Tsang CP (1994) Harmonizing music the Boltzmann way. Connection Science, 6, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dannenberg RB, Thom B, Watson D (1997) A machine learning approach to musical style recognition. In: Proceedings of the 1997 International Computer Music Conference. International Computer Music Association, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hild H, Feulner J, Menzel W (1992) HARMONET: A neural net for harmonizing chorales in the style of J.S. Bach: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber, J (1997) Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9/8, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 79, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hopfield JJ (1984) Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 81, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiernan F (2000) Score-based style recognition using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings of the first International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2000). Plymouth, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kohonen T (1972) Correlation Matrix Memories. IEEE Transactions on Computers C-21, 4, April 1972

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laden B, Keefe DH (1989) The representation of pitch in a neural net model of chord classification. Computer Music Journal 13/4, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lämmel U, Cleve J (2001) Lehr-und Übungsbuch Künstliche Intelligenz. Fachbuchverlag Leipzig im Carl-Hanser-Verlag, München. ISBN 3-446-21421-6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luger GF, Stubblefield W (1998) Artificial intelligence. Structures and strategies for complex problem solving, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam. ISBN 0-805-31196-3

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. McCulloch W, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 1943

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCulloch W (1945) A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 1945

    Google Scholar 

  16. Minsky M, Papert S (1969) Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Miranda ER, Biles JA (eds) (2007) Evolutionary computer music. Springer, London. ISBN 978-1-84628-599-8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mozer MC (1994) Neural network music composition by prediction: Exploring the benefits of psychoacoustic constraints and multiscale processing. Connection Science, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pazos A, del Riego SA, Dorado J, Romero-Cardalda JJ (1999) Connectionist system for music interpretation. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN’99), vol 6. IEEEE, New York, pp 4002–4005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenblatt F (1962) Principles of neurodynamics. Spartan, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams R (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart D, McClelland JL (eds) (1986) Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 1: Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams R (1986) Learning internal representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidhuber J, Eck D (2002) A first look at music composition using LSTM recurrent neural networks. Technical Report IDSIA-07-02, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidhuber J, Eck D (2005) Composing music with LSTM recurrent networks — Blues improvisation. http://www.idsia.ch/ juergen/blues/index.html Cited 3 Nov 2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shepard RN (1982) Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89/4, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tillmann B (1999) Connectionist simulation of tonal knowledge representation. Publications Journées d’Informatique Musicale, Issy-Les-Moulineaux, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tillmann B, Bharucha JJ, Bigand E (2000) Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach. Psychological Review, 107/4, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  28. Todd PM (1989) A connectionist approach to algorithmic composition. Computer Music Journal, 13/4, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  29. Werbos P (1974) Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences. PhD Thesis, Harvard University, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  30. Widrow B, Hoff ME (1960) Adaptive switching circuits. IRE Western Electric Show and Convention Record, 4, August 23, 1960

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Artificial Neural Networks. In: Algorithmic Composition. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-75540-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics