Skip to main content

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Sport Utility Vehicles: The Case for Qatar

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Smart and Green Solutions for Transport Systems (TSTP 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1091))

Abstract

Electric vehicle technologies are attractive alternatives to traditional vehicles towards achieving sustainable transportation. The adoption of these technologies has a great potential in reducing road transportation externalities. As Qatar aims to achieve 10% electric vehicles by 2030, this research reveals the macro-level environmental, social, and economic impacts and benefits of electric vehicles in Qatar. The studied vehicle technologies are, gasoline vehicle (ICV), hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV), and battery electric vehicle (BEV). In this regard, we quantified 9 macro level indicators using Multi regional input-output (MRIO)-based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework and compared the vehicles accordingly. The results show that, electric vehicles are better options in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), Particulate Matter Formation (PMF), and Photochemical Ozone Formation (POF) impacts. In addition to that, the results demonstrated that electric vehicles are more cost effectives than the traditional ones, while they are worse than traditional vehicles in terms of employment, operating surplus, and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yuksel, T., Tamayao, M.A.M., Hendrickson, C., Azevedo, I.M., Michalek, J.J.: Effect of regional grid mix, driving patterns and climate on the comparative carbon footprint of gasoline and plug-in electric vehicles in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 11(4), 044007 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bicer, Y., Dincer, I.: Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen, methanol and electric vehicles from well to wheel. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 3767–3777 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qatar General Electricity and Water Corporation. MoU signed to launch Green Car Initiative (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Qatar Green Leaders. The Next Big Obstacle for Electric Vehicles? Charging Infrastructure (2017). http://www.qatargreenleaders.com/news/sustainability-news/1438-the-next-big-obstacle-for-electric-vehicles-charging-infrastructure. Accessed 12 Dec 2017

  5. The Ministry of Development Planning and Statistics. Qatar National Vision 2030 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Our World in Data CO2 and other Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. JustHere Doha. Doha 12th most polluted city in the world; possible causes are higher air traffic and growing population (2014). http://www.justhere.qa/2014/05/doha-among-worlds-polluted-cities-higher-air-traffic-population-levels-may-causal-agents/

  8. Qatar Rail. Qatar Rail Annual Report 2015–2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guinée, J.: Life cycle sustainability assessment: what is it and what are its challenges? In: Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology, pp. 45–68. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Guinee, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., Rydberg, T.: Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future †. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 90–96 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M., Halog, A., Cloutier, S.: Systems thinking for life cycle sustainability assessment: a review of recent developments, applications, and future perspectives. Sustainability 9, 706 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O.: Towards life cycle sustainability assessment of alternative passenger vehicles. Sustainability 6, 9305–9342 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O., Egilmez, G.: Integration of system dynamics approach toward deepening and broadening the life cycle sustainability assessment framework: a case for electric vehicles. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 1009–1034 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper is an output of a project supported by Qatar University, grant number QUSD-CENG-2018\2019-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuri Cihat Onat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aboushaqrah, N.N.M., Onat, N.C., Kucukvar, M., Jabbar, R. (2020). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Sport Utility Vehicles: The Case for Qatar. In: Sierpiński, G. (eds) Smart and Green Solutions for Transport Systems. TSTP 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1091. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35543-2_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics