Skip to main content

Jean Améry: Suicide, the Refusal to Heal, and Humanistic Freedom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Jean Améry

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the philosophical importance of Jean Améry’s essay collection On Suicide. Améry defends suicide as an act of freedom. Freely choosing to commit suicide is an example of the uniquely human ability to act spontaneously and to reject the inertia of the logic of life. I argue that this represents the conclusion of Améry’s philosophical system. Améry’s defense of suicide is also his ultimate challenge to norms that coerce well-being, the logic of the everyday, and the natural progression of history. However, this challenge is performed within a system that is firmly grounded in Enlightenment notions of autonomy and human freedom. Consequently, On Suicide sheds light on the tensions between Améry’s defense of progress, autonomy, and humanism and his rejection of compulsory healing and flourishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This term is somewhat contentious. Améry had a fraught relationship with pessimism, hope, and historicity. I will examine how there is a tension between these aspects of Améry’s writings in the second half of this chapter. I will also examine how these tensions can be best understood in light of Améry’s conclusions about suicide.

  2. 2.

    Lt. Gustl does not ultimately commit suicide as he is released from his obligation and fears by the death of the baker. Relieved, Gustl regains his sense of dignity and is confident he will succeed in his afternoon duel. However, Améry continues to associate Gustl’s former parasuicidal behavior with the loss of his sense of dignity and autonomy after compromising his military duties. As such, for most of the novel he represents an example of a parasuicidal person “before the leap” when he professes his decision to kill himself.

  3. 3.

    The coming of death is also natural for Améry. I will examine these tensions further in my subsequent section on tensions and dualities within suicide.

  4. 4.

    Améry was highly critical of Eichmann in Jerusalem and what he saw as Arendt’s condoning of oppressive forgiveness. However, there remain parallels between their conceptions of freedom and spontaneity.

  5. 5.

    This lament was both practical and psychological. For Levi resistance to the dehumanization of the camps through rituals such as cleaning oneself, friendship, and the potential for spontaneous action was what was crushed before a person was reduced to the status of the walking dead Mussalman.

  6. 6.

    Améry controversially compares the destigmitization of suicide with the decriminalization of homosexuality.

  7. 7.

    The linguistic shift occurred considerably earlier in English. The term “self-murder” was commonly used in the sixteenth century but was mostly replaced by the less value laden “suicide” by 1650 (Bahr 2013).

  8. 8.

    Améry distinguishes himself from his contemporary anti-psychiatrists. He does not think madness represents a social construct and is dismissive of attempts to valorize irrationality.

  9. 9.

    Améry does not directly reference Hume’s Of Suicide throughout his On Suicide. However, the English title is a direct reference to the prior work. Similarly, given Améry speaks at length of his study of his reading of the British empiricists it is highly likely he was familiar with the work.

References

  • Améry, J. (1978, March 31). Archeology of Knowledge – Michel Foucault and His Discourse of Counter-Enlightenment [Archäologie des Wissens – Michel Foucault und sein Diskurs der Gegenaufklärung]. Republished in Zeit Online. Retrieved from https://www.zeit.de/1978/14/archaeologie-des-wissens/komplettansicht.

  • Améry, J. (1984a). Radical Humanism (S. Rosenfeld & S. Rosenfeld, Trans.). Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1984b). Enlightenment as Philosophia Perennis. Originally Published 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1984c). Sartre: Greatness and Failure. Originally Published 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1984d). The Time of Rehabilitation. Originally Published 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1994). On Aging: Revolt and Resignation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1999a). At the Mind’s Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1999b). On Suicide (J. Barlow, Trans.). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1967). The Origins of Totalitarianism (Rev. ed.). London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, A. (2013). Between “Self-Murder” and “Suicide”: The Modern Etymology of Self-Killing. Journal of Social History, 46(3, Spring), 620–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shai, R. (2010). To Reverse the Irreversible: On Time Disorder in the Work of Jean Améry. In J. R. Watson (Ed.), Metacide: In the Pursuit of Excellence (pp. 73–92). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudholm, T. (2010). Resentment’s Virtue: Jean Améry and the Refusal to Forgive. Paperback. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1985). Meditations on First Philosophy (Ronald Rubin, Trans.). Arete Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1996). The Simplest of Pleasures. In Foucault Live: (Interviews, 1961–1984) (Hochroth and Johnson, Trans.) (pp. 295–297). New York: Semiotexte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2007). Of Suicide. In S. Buckle (Ed.), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Other Writings (pp. 181–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (2000). If This Is a Man: The Truce (Vol. 222). London: Everyman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, L. (2003). Leaving You. Ivan R. Dee Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, J. (2012). Ethical Loneliness. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (2002). Fatal Freedom – The Ethics and Politics of Suicide. Syracuse University Press Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treitler, W. (2011). Saying No and Fleeing Nowhere. In M. Zolkos (Ed.), On Jean Améry – Philosophy of Catastrophe. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace Campbell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Campbell, G. (2019). Jean Améry: Suicide, the Refusal to Heal, and Humanistic Freedom. In: Ataria, Y., Kravitz, A., Pitcovski, E. (eds) Jean Améry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28095-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics